Page 5 of 7
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 11:34 pm
by Ozricosis
That's abuse of power. What Shiz said at least.
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 12:47 am
by Raindog
The funny thing about all this discussion is that I never see theBored stack. I think by and large most @Allegs don't stack and most try to antistack. For me, I wouldn't stack with either my @Alleg tag or my @ACE one and I have no hider so I simply never stack.
I do agree that @Allegs should be held to a higher standard, I just think they meet that higher standard the vast majority of the time.
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 2:33 am
by H_Mallow
I don't think I've ever played on the same team as Finger@alleg.
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 2:36 am
by Psychosis
i'd rather have stacking @Alleg's around to be useful, then @alleg's under hiders pretenting not to be @Alleg so they can fly where they want.
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 2:46 am
by BlackViper
Yawn, glad I took 2 days away.
Dramaâ„¢
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 2:50 am
by spideycw
Glad I took 6!!!!!
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 3:10 am
by Trigger1969
Shizoku wrote:QUOTE (Shizoku @ May 28 2007, 06:13 PM) Personaly I could care less whatever team an @alleg joins, they deserve to have fun just like the rest of us. However I have noticed several times an @Alleg threatening to ban a commander who obviously has a weaker team if he doesn't take on another newbie, then once the commander has taken the newb he joins the other stacked side.
That pisses me off a lot.
I could really care less about most of this thread, but this post definitely throws up the red flag. That is the type of power play that can ruin a game.
I know the helo is already setup to give less points for stacked teams, but maybe it should be adjusted more. What about zero points awarded/lost if stack reaches a certain level. A step farther might be that a winning stacked team can actually lose points if the weaker team puts up a good fight (based on team points). I know I'm still new to the game and community, but this just seems a reasonable suggestion... something to be looked at anyway.
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 11:20 am
by Zapper
Shizoku wrote:QUOTE (Shizoku @ May 29 2007, 01:13 AM) Personaly I could care less whatever team an @alleg joins, they deserve to have fun just like the rest of us. However I have noticed several times an @Alleg threatening to ban a commander who obviously has a weaker team if he doesn't take on another newbie, then once the commander has taken the newb he joins the other stacked side.
That pisses me off a lot.
What.. the fact that the commander was weak and accepted the newbie or did the Alleg grab the spot you wanted.. plz flame. /wink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink.gif" />
Zap
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 11:39 am
by Papsmear
I have NEVER personally seen an @Alleg do what shiz mentioned & I would agree it is abuse of power.
Hurry back spidey we miss you.
TheBored hardly plays these days & I have a feeling he was playing the Devil's advocate.
@Alleg have no rules on stacking/anti-stacking. It is a judgement call per the individual.
Some may stack, some may anti-stack, some may sit in the lobby, some may assist on the newbie server.
What exactly would the community have us do?
There are approximately 20 - 25 @Allegs how many out of that bunch have been terrible offenders?
If you have a major problem with one of us PM Black Viper and voice your complaints.
Should BV believe there is an issue with one of his @Allegs, he will deal with it.
Posted: Tue May 29, 2007 1:06 pm
by BlackViper
Shiz and I have already exchanged PMs for future monitoring.
@Allegs have been removed in the past. I just do it quietly. There is no sacred cow. (TE, Pook and myself will point out our shortcomings when needed to each other.)