Aint @Alleg people supposed to show better example

Ozricosis · Post by **Ozricosis** » Mon May 28, 2007 11:34 pm

That's abuse of power. What Shiz said at least.

Raindog · Post by **Raindog** » Tue May 29, 2007 12:47 am

The funny thing about all this discussion is that I never see theBored stack. I think by and large most @Allegs don't stack and most try to antistack. For me, I wouldn't stack with either my @Alleg tag or my @ACE one and I have no hider so I simply never stack.

I do agree that @Allegs should be held to a higher standard, I just think they meet that higher standard the vast majority of the time.

H_Mallow · Post by **H_Mallow** » Tue May 29, 2007 2:33 am

I don't think I've ever played on the same team as Finger@alleg.

Psychosis · Post by **Psychosis** » Tue May 29, 2007 2:36 am

i'd rather have stacking @Alleg's around to be useful, then @alleg's under hiders pretenting not to be @Alleg so they can fly where they want.

Post by **BlackViper** » Tue May 29, 2007 2:46 am

Yawn, glad I took 2 days away.

Drama™

spideycw · Post by **spideycw** » Tue May 29, 2007 2:50 am

Glad I took 6!!!!!

Trigger1969 · Post by **Trigger1969** » Tue May 29, 2007 3:10 am

Shizoku wrote:QUOTE (Shizoku @ May 28 2007, 06:13 PM) Personaly I could care less whatever team an @alleg joins, they deserve to have fun just like the rest of us. However I have noticed several times an @Alleg threatening to ban a commander who obviously has a weaker team if he doesn't take on another newbie, then once the commander has taken the newb he joins the other stacked side.

That pisses me off a lot.

I could really care less about most of this thread, but this post definitely throws up the red flag. That is the type of power play that can ruin a game.

I know the helo is already setup to give less points for stacked teams, but maybe it should be adjusted more. What about zero points awarded/lost if stack reaches a certain level. A step farther might be that a winning stacked team can actually lose points if the weaker team puts up a good fight (based on team points). I know I'm still new to the game and community, but this just seems a reasonable suggestion... something to be looked at anyway.

Zapper · Post by **Zapper** » Tue May 29, 2007 11:20 am

Shizoku wrote:QUOTE (Shizoku @ May 29 2007, 01:13 AM) Personaly I could care less whatever team an @alleg joins, they deserve to have fun just like the rest of us. However I have noticed several times an @Alleg threatening to ban a commander who obviously has a weaker team if he doesn't take on another newbie, then once the commander has taken the newb he joins the other stacked side.

That pisses me off a lot.

What.. the fact that the commander was weak and accepted the newbie or did the Alleg grab the spot you wanted.. plz flame. /wink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink.gif" />

Zap

Post by **Papsmear** » Tue May 29, 2007 11:39 am

I have NEVER personally seen an @Alleg do what shiz mentioned & I would agree it is abuse of power.

Hurry back spidey we miss you.

TheBored hardly plays these days & I have a feeling he was playing the Devil's advocate.

@Alleg have no rules on stacking/anti-stacking. It is a judgement call per the individual.
Some may stack, some may anti-stack, some may sit in the lobby, some may assist on the newbie server.
What exactly would the community have us do?

There are approximately 20 - 25 @Allegs how many out of that bunch have been terrible offenders?
If you have a major problem with one of us PM Black Viper and voice your complaints.
Should BV believe there is an issue with one of his @Allegs, he will deal with it.

Post by **BlackViper** » Tue May 29, 2007 1:06 pm

Shiz and I have already exchanged PMs for future monitoring.

@Allegs have been removed in the past. I just do it quietly. There is no sacred cow. (TE, Pook and myself will point out our shortcomings when needed to each other.)