Page 4 of 7

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 4:22 pm
by minigun
i think anyone can find imbalance on any core. to my knowlege SF doesn't mind playing on your core.
i would think feedback would be good. i didn't play sunday, is money for every giga base to much?
i don't have an answer...but feedback from people is good.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 4:50 pm
by Striker
Icky wrote:QUOTE (Icky @ Mar 1 2011, 07:17 AM) I challenge anyone to find a post-sg thread where SF lost and Striker or a proxy didn't make some sort of excuse about why it wasn't their fault and/or they weren't really trying or taking it seriously.
There is always a reason why a game is lost. Bad miner defense, lack of teamwork, bought bombers when you shouldn't have, enemy gets tech out faster, etc. There is almost always a main reason why someone loses a match. SF is always trying, but sometimes the other team is just better that day. So if you want to call them "excuses" that's fine by me. Also, we always take matches seriously.

Malicious Wraith wrote:QUOTE (Malicious Wraith @ Mar 1 2011, 08:01 AM) I look forward to playing SF when they are capable of beating BS. I suppose that will never happen as long as they lose, however.
My my someone forgot the game we played in January against you. Do you have a short memory MW?

NightRychune wrote:QUOTE (NightRychune @ Mar 1 2011, 09:33 AM) i received many complaints after this game regarding the way my core was imbalanced and how SF doesn't want to play on it anymore because giga is clearly overpowered
As I already mentioned to you almost all of those concerns were brought up a week before the match internally. I also never stated we won't be playing on the core due to Giga being overpowered. I said we would wait until the next revision.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 5:04 pm
by Malicious Wraith
Striker wrote:QUOTE (Striker @ Mar 1 2011, 11:50 AM) My my someone forgot the game we played in January against you.
I am honored, suddenly "I" am BS. Unless you were actually referring to me, then no, I did not have the honor of playing your glorious squad in January. I will, however, value each and every match against SF over the coming months. I do enjoy wiping the floor with you. I did enjoy rubbing it in. I finally got my gratification after the year that SF refused to play my squad, and the squad that I was in.

This is going to be fun.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 5:24 pm
by spideycw
Why does fed never post this much when his squad resigns in 9 minutes? Seems like that would get his mouth jawing more than beating @SF?

Man does anyone else remember him telling pook "I have many hiders" then realized how stupid it was to claim he had tons of secret hiders to the head admin and go edit his every response in the thread to "."?

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 5:41 pm
by vogue
rofl so that's where "." comes from

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 5:54 pm
by spideycw
vogue wrote:QUOTE (vogue @ Mar 1 2011, 12:41 PM) rofl so that's where "." comes from
Yes Fed is an idiot. He actually argued with everyone for several pages INCLUDING the admins that the hider limit was 3. He did this while constantly referring to himself as "Joe Genius" and telling the entire community how he was smarter than everyone.

The fact that he went through and edited all 30 of his posts is telling enough of how smart he turned out to be.

And now Ryjamsan and Fed are in cahoots! A match made in heaven (though I've yet to see ryj edit any of his posts)

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 6:44 pm
by Shizoku
To be fair, that button is so difficult to find only a genius could use it.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 6:52 pm
by Malicious Wraith
Years later, still discussed - Spidey gives me too much credit. Thank you, thank you.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 7:03 pm
by voobscout
I'm rather amazed the "." got into another squad... lol

Apparently @BS always had an infinite vacuum of ego, which has gone unnoticed by the ".", which is rather surprising in and of itself (not the lack of e-peens, but the fact that it didn't attract the "." beforehand)

As to the game, i do not share Striker's opinion at all, i think XC giga is just fine and we lost fare and square.

GG @BS.

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2011 7:07 pm
by Icky
Striker wrote:QUOTE (Striker @ Mar 1 2011, 11:50 AM) So if you want to call them "excuses" that's fine by me. Also, we always take matches seriously.
TOOT TOOOOOT.

All aboard the SF excuse train...

Part 1 of 2 b/c the board only allows so many quotes!
Striker wrote:QUOTE (Striker @ Sep 19 2006, 07:38 PM) ...and I'm sure with SF down by 3 pilots due to internet problems didn't hurt either...
badpazzword wrote:QUOTE (badpazzword @ Dec 5 2006, 04:32 PM) And we ended down three. You get it...
CronoDroid wrote:QUOTE (CronoDroid @ Oct 9 2006, 01:33 AM) Main problem was lack of numbers, RT was always two up and by the end of the game we lost Wizard and badp due to lag/family matters.
Striker wrote:QUOTE (Striker @ Jul 22 2007, 06:32 PM) Unfortunately, several people dropped due to bad connections on their end. Plus, some others had to leave because the game started way too late. Our 2 to 1 majority quickly turned in just 2 or 3 pilot advantage.
Striker wrote:QUOTE (Striker @ Jul 30 2007, 01:14 PM) However, since you posted, we had too many people who had connection issues the entire game. We ended up having to go back to to the main lobby and join a European server because of the ongoing issues.
Striker wrote:QUOTE (Striker @ Nov 23 2008, 04:22 PM) Our commander had never lead the squadron before in a squadron match. However, losing in 8 minutes seems a bit extreme (I wasn't there). Nothing like trial by fire though for newbie commanders!
Striker wrote:QUOTE (Striker @ Feb 9 2009, 07:14 PM) In the end we didn't win, but we didn't care that much.
Adept wrote:QUOTE (Adept @ Apr 6 2009, 04:56 AM) I wanted to kick myself. I had a project for the university that I had to finish, and managed to wrap up at SG time +3.5 hours (which is half past one AM over here). I had really been waiting to play ACE again too, since it's been a long time and they always have good turnup.

Then it turns out that the RL hammer struck half my squad at the same time!
Striker wrote:QUOTE (Striker @ Apr 20 2009, 08:15 PM) Considering how many utility pilots were flying on our side, it's not too bad.
Adept wrote:QUOTE (Adept @ Mar 8 2009, 04:02 PM) GB bring excellent turnout, while we'd sabotaged ourselves by an ASGS message which got the time adjust the wrong way. 'ya 'ya. Oh well, some running around and paniking rounds up first the 10 needed, and then some more. Eventually the game grows to something like 15 vs. 16.
Striker wrote:QUOTE (Striker @ Mar 1 2009, 07:22 PM) To be fair, I launched in a fighter after you podded me. Then I docked because I had to take care of something outside of Allegiance. I very rarely play whole games anymore due to real life.
Adept wrote:QUOTE (Adept @ Mar 16 2009, 01:48 PM) Have I ever told people how much I hate heavy scouts having QL missiles? No, probably only three or four times.

Quess how much I hate it when the enemy is bios sup with cloakable heavy scouts with QL DF3?