Page 4 of 7

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 5:59 pm
by Xeretov
Adept wrote:QUOTE (Adept @ Oct 3 2009, 01:11 PM) I meant that people should have had the pictures (or some other objective measurement) to make a informed vote.
Pictures can be misleading too though.

I'd rather people be voting based on their experiences.

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:12 pm
by zombywoof
Hellsyng wrote:QUOTE (Hellsyng @ Oct 3 2009, 10:57 AM) Exactly. Its just one of the quirks of Bios. If you continue to balance to much then the factions will become basically the same with different skins.
Voted no on size and no on minepacks instead of prox
Oh in that case I'm going to make a faction where it's "quirk" is that its ints are about the size of a gat sprite. it's just a "quirk" right, and just part of faction flavor, so it's ok right?

Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 10:15 pm
by Broodwich
the ic fig is the only model you can actually hit with all your guns anymore

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 5:40 am
by DasSmiter
tbh I haven't noticed any change in how many figs I kill.

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 5:44 am
by IB_
Xeretov wrote:QUOTE (Xeretov @ Oct 3 2009, 10:59 AM) Pictures can be misleading too though.

I'd rather people be voting based on their experiences.
I'd rather people voted based on propaganda. Making Bios Fighters larger will give you cancer!

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 8:20 am
by notjarvis
IB_ wrote:QUOTE (IB_ @ Oct 4 2009, 06:44 AM) I'd rather people voted based on propaganda. Making Bios Fighters larger will give you cancer!
:rofl:

A vote for minepacks is a vote for Hitler!


Seriously - The poll doesn't seem conclusive at all on the size issue, so it's prolly best to put the topic on the backburner for a while, and then bring it up again when people are whining.....


In my opinion Bios is overpowered in recent PUG games, and the games where they demonstrate their "comeback power" can be over-long and predictable. But making decisions against the will of the poll you've run will make people not want to bother.

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 2:19 pm
by spideycw
notjarvis wrote:QUOTE (notjarvis @ Oct 4 2009, 04:20 AM) Seriously - The poll doesn't seem conclusive at all on the size issue, so it's prolly best to put the topic on the backburner for a while, and then bring it up again when people are whining.....

But making decisions against the will of the poll you've run will make people not want to bother.
Very well said Mr. Jarvis - on both accounts

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 2:34 pm
by Exo
Voted no, since I don't mind piddly Bios figs; but would be nice to have marginally smaller IC Figs rather than the tugboat design they seem to use at the moment.

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:12 pm
by IB_
How about you swop the IC Fig and IC Int models for a week?

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:26 pm
by Adept
IB_ wrote:QUOTE (IB_ @ Oct 4 2009, 06:12 PM) How about you swop the IC Fig and IC Int models for a week?
That would be pricelessly hilarious :iluv:

How about I expand the comparison to cover all figs, and maybe all ints too. Then, we can talk about this again in a few months?