Page 4 of 13

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 12:01 am
by cashto
Yes, 0.6 ... since Trueskill is a 50-point system, multiplying it by 0.6 moves it to the more familiar 30-point ranks we know and love.

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 1:37 am
by quackdamnyou
Where's the thread with the lulz again?

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:52 am
by Correct
Question: Why is pkk ranked so high?

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:55 am
by Grimmwolf_GB
Check his win - loss both command and normal games. He might have won games that were stacked against him, ...

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:57 am
by pkk
Correct wrote:QUOTE (Correct @ Dec 31 2008, 11:52 AM) Question: Why is pkk ranked so high?
Because ELO was broken, HELO was broken, why shouldn't AllegSkill be broken? ;)

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 10:59 am
by Dorjan
Can we have a numeral listing for when you sort please?

For example, I want to rank by commander rank and would like to see what number a person is without having to count :)

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:01 am
by Broodwich
I agree. Fedman is not ranked best commander. Allegskill is broken

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:01 am
by Correct
Grimmwolf_GB wrote:QUOTE (Grimmwolf_GB @ Dec 31 2008, 02:55 AM) Check his win - loss both command and normal games. He might have won games that were stacked against him, ...
But his stack rating is higher than mine.

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:16 am
by Grimmwolf_GB
That might mean, when he did not stack, he won games against the odds, while you lost games when you stacked.
The outcome of the game does not influence the stack rating you gain, but it influences your rank. You gotta stack and antistack more wisely. :)

Posted: Wed Dec 31, 2008 11:20 am
by sgt_baker
Remember that the stack rating is a general indicator of the type of games played. It isn't used anywhere in the AllegSkill calcs. In this case Grimm is correct. ;)