Cores for R5

Tontow · Post by **Tontow** » Sat Sep 08, 2007 11:29 pm

madpeople wrote:QUOTE (madpeople @ Sep 8 2007, 02:48 PM) i just thought having more logical operators than AND would allow for more varied tech trees

someone else said somewhere about null objects

they don't give you anything, and you can't use them, you're not even aware of them in game

but they have pres and defs, and when all their pres are met, they yeild all their defs

Would http://www.freeallegiance.org/forums/index...621&hl=tech be where you read about those null objects?

Vlymoxyd · Post by **Vlymoxyd** » Sun Sep 09, 2007 2:58 pm

-Ability to add a "request" check. If a ship/item has it checked, it would require comm approval even if the ship is free or that the player has enough money.

-Bases should be upgraded once all the pre of the upgrade is done. Right now, it only works if the last pre is unlocked by a devel.

KGJV · Post by **KGJV** » Sun Sep 09, 2007 5:14 pm

juckto wrote:QUOTE (juckto @ Sep 9 2007, 12:46 AM) Drones which will shoot nans at any friendly ships within range.

Anyone ever tried this already ? If it doesnt work, it should be easy to fix.

Andon · Post by **Andon** » Sun Sep 09, 2007 5:37 pm

isn't there something like that in Phoenix?

terrenblade · Post by **terrenblade** » Sun Sep 09, 2007 5:42 pm

Ability for cons to build on existing bases, not just rocks and empty space?

Andon · Post by **Andon** » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:22 pm

cons can't build on empty space. Let them! (Only layers can do that) Or allow layers to lay bases

apochboi · Post by **apochboi** » Sun Sep 09, 2007 6:48 pm

KGJV wrote:QUOTE (KGJV @ Sep 9 2007, 06:14 PM) Anyone ever tried this already ? If it doesnt work, it should be easy to fix.

I tried that kage it dont work /wink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink.gif" />

w0dk4 · Post by **w0dk4** » Sun Sep 09, 2007 8:07 pm

Allow for different explosions on projectiles and get rid of the hardcoded size for those.

Post by **Raveen** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 12:11 pm

Allow for different scan profiles.

Currently the scan behind a ship is lower (50%) than it's forward scan range. Maybe give the option of a forward scan range, side and rear as variables.

KGJV · Post by **KGJV** » Mon Sep 10, 2007 1:07 pm

madp and tontow, i got lost in your long discussion about logical stuff /smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" /> plz summarize and simplify /tongue.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":P" border="0" alt="tongue.gif" />