Possible New (FAST!) Server?

Allegiance discussion not belonging in another forum.
Raindog
Posts: 281
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

Post by Raindog »

I'd be willing to help with the costs as long as I could reserve the right to boot Duck off the server for any reason at any time. /mrgreen.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="mrgreen.gif" /> In all seriousness, I'd be willing to help (as long as I can sneak it past my wife /ninja.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":ninja:" border="0" alt="ninja.gif" /> )
Image
Raindog
Posts: 281
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio

Post by Raindog »

Code: Select all

Pinging 204.14.17.162 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=51
Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=94ms TTL=51
Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=51
Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 204.14.17.162:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 94ms, Maximum = 96ms, Average = 95ms



Tracing route to mail.initechcomputers.com [204.14.17.162]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1     1 ms     1 ms     1 ms  home [192.168.1.254]
  2    43 ms    43 ms    43 ms  oh-76-1-24-1.dhcp.embarqhsd.net [76.1.24.1]
  3   196 ms    61 ms    62 ms  oh-71-0-6-61.sta.embarqhsd.net [71.0.6.61]
  4    81 ms    84 ms    82 ms  sl-gw23-rly-2-1.sprintlink.net [160.81.255.137]

  5    86 ms    86 ms    86 ms  sl-bb21-rly-3-2.sprintlink.net [144.232.14.77]
  6    83 ms    84 ms    84 ms  sl-bb21-dc-5-0-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.8.164]

  7    83 ms    84 ms    84 ms  sl-st21-ash-10-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.20.148]

  8    87 ms    88 ms    88 ms  sl-deutsche-5-0.sprintlink.net [144.223.246.70]

  9   106 ms   110 ms   110 ms  yto-sa1.YTO.CA.net.DTAG.DE [62.154.5.201]
 10    97 ms    98 ms    98 ms  217.6.24.194
 11    98 ms    98 ms    98 ms  mail.initechcomputers.com [204.14.17.162]

Trace complete.


compared to:

Code: Select all

Pinging 69.93.201.146 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 69.93.201.146: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=111
Reply from 69.93.201.146: bytes=32 time=99ms TTL=111
Reply from 69.93.201.146: bytes=32 time=104ms TTL=111
Reply from 69.93.201.146: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=111

Ping statistics for 69.93.201.146:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 98ms, Maximum = 104ms, Average = 100ms
Man, do I hate my DSL
Image
Shizoku
Posts: 5816
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Ozzy's right nut.

Post by Shizoku »

A canadian connection? This would probably be really good for me, I'll check when I get home.
Image
Papsmear
Posts: 4810
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

Post by Papsmear »

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
© Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Papsmear>tracert tigereye.ca

Tracing route to tigereye.ca [204.14.17.162]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 * * * Request timed out.
2 9 ms 8 ms 9 ms gw01.ajax.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.90.33]
3 6 ms 5 ms 6 ms gw01.ajax.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.82.41]
4 8 ms 7 ms 10 ms 64.71.240.189
5 8 ms 7 ms 7 ms gw02.bloor.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.80.165]
6 8 ms 17 ms 8 ms igw01.front.phub.net.cable.rogers.com [64.71.240.62]
7 8 ms 10 ms 10 ms gw-ndcc.torontointernetxchange.net [198.32.245.69]
8 9 ms 8 ms 8 ms mail.initechcomputers.com [204.14.17.162]

Trace complete.

C:\Documents and Settings\Papsmear>ping 69.93.201.146

Pinging 69.93.201.146 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 69.93.201.146: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=113
Reply from 69.93.201.146: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=113
Reply from 69.93.201.146: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=113
Reply from 69.93.201.146: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=113

Ping statistics for 69.93.201.146:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 81ms, Maximum = 88ms, Average = 85ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Papsmear>


A Server in Toronto would be way sweet, as I live just outside the city
I am in with some cash!

If this server is faster than the others couldn't we close down one of the US servers and divert some of the cash to Tigereye?

Curious....would this company let you set-up a 1 week or 1 month test just to see how well it works for the community?
Last edited by Papsmear on Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Image
jgbaxter
Posts: 2181
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 7:00 am

Post by jgbaxter »

60-100. Not so bad, on par with planet, little worse then Thalserve, lightning bolt from heaven over Euro, and a pale contender over FTX.

Speaking of this, I've recently come into the chance to host the FTX servers on a dedicated business connection... Pingy Herey.




/smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />
Last edited by jgbaxter on Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
n.b. I may not see a forum post replied to me or a pm sent to me for weeks and weeks...
ski2slow
Posts: 139
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 8:00 am
Location: Michigan

Post by ski2slow »

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
© Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings>ping tigereye.ca

Pinging tigereye.ca [204.14.17.162] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=50
Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=50
Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=50
Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 204.14.17.162:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 61ms, Maximum = 84ms, Average = 67ms

C:\Documents and Settings>tracert tigereye.ca

Tracing route to tigereye.ca [204.14.17.162]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms cblmdm72-241-34-58.buckeyecom.net [72.241.34.58]
2 9 ms 12 ms 13 ms 10.21.0.1
3 11 ms 11 ms 8 ms core3.buckeyecom.net [72.240.0.202]
4 19 ms 20 ms 18 ms sl-gw10-roa-3-1.sprintlink.net [160.81.133.109]
5 19 ms 26 ms 17 ms sl-bb20-roa-2-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.0.5]
6 21 ms 20 ms 20 ms sl-bb22-chi-4-0-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.18.36]
7 24 ms 24 ms 24 ms sl-crs1-chi-0-1-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.26.48]
8 23 ms 21 ms 21 ms sl-bb21-chi-8-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.26.78]
9 44 ms 43 ms 41 ms sl-bb22-nyc-15-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.9.148]
10 44 ms 45 ms 41 ms sl-bb26-nyc-11-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.7.41]
11 44 ms 42 ms 42 ms sl-bb27-nyc-8-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.7.38]
12 93 ms 42 ms 45 ms sl-gw31-nyc-1-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.13.34]
13 44 ms 42 ms 42 ms sl-deutsche-3-0.sprintlink.net [144.223.27.134]
14 60 ms 62 ms 63 ms yto-sa1.YTO.CA.net.DTAG.DE [62.154.5.201]
15 60 ms 61 ms 62 ms 217.6.24.194
16 63 ms 63 ms 63 ms mail.initechcomputers.com [204.14.17.162]

Trace complete.


Seems pretty fast from Michigan. I wonder how it will be from Japan though.

ski /ninja.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":ninja:" border="0" alt="ninja.gif" />
Last edited by ski2slow on Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImage
Clay_Pigeon
Posts: 3211
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:00 am
Location: my pod

Post by Clay_Pigeon »

Ugh....damn DC traffic

Code: Select all

Silence:~ troy$ traceroute -I tigereye.ca
traceroute to tigereye.ca (204.14.17.162), 64 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1)  0.555 ms  0.310 ms  0.230 ms
 2  10.71.96.1 (10.71.96.1)  13.181 ms  5.857 ms  8.027 ms
 3  gig2-2.akrnoh2-ybr2.neo.rr.com (24.164.103.54)  15.898 ms  7.303 ms  7.884 ms
 4  srp12-1.ncntoh1-rtr1.neo.rr.com (24.164.101.36)  8.967 ms  10.442 ms  9.575 ms
 5  son2-0-1.ncntoh1-rtr0.neo.rr.com (24.95.81.169)  9.012 ms  10.105 ms  13.840 ms
 6  te-3-1.car1.cleveland1.level3.net (64.156.66.49)  49.406 ms  60.365 ms te-3-2.car1.cleveland1.level3.net (64.156.66.53)  22.008 ms
 7  ae-4-4.ebr1.washington1.level3.net (4.69.132.194)  112.830 ms  108.215 ms  108.132 ms
 8  ge-3-0-0-53.gar1.washington1.level3.net (4.68.121.66)  108.929 ms  106.734 ms  108.970 ms
 9  4.68.111.50 (4.68.111.50)  110.217 ms dtag-level3-oc48.washington1.level3.net (67.29.172.2)  31.322 ms 4.68.111.50 (4.68.111.50)  107.763 ms
10  yto-sa1.yto.ca.net.dtag.de (62.154.5.201)  130.200 ms  129.064 ms  129.429 ms
11  217.6.24.194 (217.6.24.194)  116.881 ms  115.897 ms  115.125 ms
12  mail.initechcomputers.com (204.14.17.162)  114.806 ms  116.616 ms  117.555 ms
Silence:~ troy$ ping tigereye.ca
PING tigereye.ca (204.14.17.162): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 204.14.17.162: icmp_seq=0 ttl=49 time=117.750 ms
64 bytes from 204.14.17.162: icmp_seq=1 ttl=49 time=116.162 ms
64 bytes from 204.14.17.162: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=116.844 ms
64 bytes from 204.14.17.162: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=116.154 ms
64 bytes from 204.14.17.162: icmp_seq=4 ttl=49 time=117.143 ms
^C
--- tigereye.ca ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 116.154/116.811/117.750/0.608 ms
Image
"Therefore I will boast all the more gladly about my weaknesses, so that Christ's power may rest on me." -2 Cor 12:9
"Never know how long I've waited, anticipated your smile pressed against mine." -Running
blackrob
Posts: 238
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:00 am

Post by blackrob »

From central Illinois, USA

CODEPinging tigereye.ca [204.14.17.162] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=50
Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=50
Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=50
Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 204.14.17.162:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 50ms, Maximum = 59ms, Average = 52ms

CODE 1 8 ms 12 ms 6 ms 74-136-192-1.dhcp.insightbb.com [74.136.192.1]
2 6 ms 7 ms 7 ms 74-134-3-61.dhcp.insightbb.com [74.134.3.61]
3 10 ms 17 ms 9 ms 74.128.8.189
4 10 ms 12 ms 13 ms sl-gw38-chi-5-2.sprintlink.net [144.223.35.141]

5 12 ms 13 ms 10 ms sl-bb24-chi-6-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.26.129]

6 33 ms 32 ms 34 ms sl-bb25-nyc-12-0-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.20.11
9]
7 32 ms 36 ms 36 ms sl-bb24-nyc-10-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.13.181]

8 33 ms 32 ms 34 ms sl-bb23-nyc-4-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.13.169]

9 32 ms 35 ms 33 ms sl-gw31-nyc-0-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.13.32]
10 33 ms 36 ms 32 ms sl-deutsche-3-0.sprintlink.net [144.223.27.134]

11 52 ms 51 ms 61 ms yto-sa1.YTO.CA.net.DTAG.DE [62.154.5.201]
12 56 ms 52 ms 50 ms 217.6.24.194
13 54 ms 60 ms 50 ms mail.initechcomputers.com [204.14.17.162]

Trace complete.
Image
jess_i_74
Posts: 761
Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2004 8:00 am
Location: PA

Post by jess_i_74 »

From PA:

Code: Select all

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.


Pinging tigereye.ca [204.14.17.162] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=47
Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=47
Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=47
Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=47

Ping statistics for 204.14.17.162:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 38ms, Maximum = 46ms, Average = 40ms


Tracing route to tigereye.ca [204.14.17.162]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  2     7 ms     9 ms     6 ms  c-5-0-ubr01.quarryville.pa.panjde.comcast.net [7
3.151.232.1]
  3     9 ms     7 ms     6 ms  ge-6-1-ur01.quarryville.pa.panjde.comcast.net [6
8.86.214.105]
  4     8 ms     6 ms     8 ms  te-9-1-ur02.lancaster.pa.panjde.comcast.net [68.
86.208.254]
  5     8 ms     7 ms    11 ms  te-9-1-ur01.lancaster.pa.panjde.comcast.net [68.
86.209.2]
  6     8 ms     8 ms     7 ms  te-9-1-ur01.montville.pa.panjde.comcast.net [68.
86.209.6]
  7     8 ms     7 ms     9 ms  te-9-1-ur01.elizabethtwn.pa.panjde.comcast.net [
68.86.209.10]
  8    12 ms     7 ms     7 ms  te-9-1-ur01.lowerswatera.pa.panjde.comcast.net [
68.86.209.13]
  9     9 ms    12 ms     9 ms  te-2-2-ar01.lowerpaxton.pa.panjde.comcast.net [6
8.86.209.18]
 10    11 ms    11 ms    10 ms  po-90-ar01.coatesville.pa.panjde.comcast.net [68
.86.208.41]
 11    15 ms    12 ms    12 ms  po-90-ar01.wallingford.pa.panjde.comcast.net [68
.86.208.37]
 12    12 ms    12 ms    13 ms  po90-ar01.401nbroadst.pa.panjde.comcast.net [68.
86.208.29]
 13    18 ms    16 ms    19 ms  12.118.114.49
 14    25 ms    22 ms    21 ms  tbr2-p012301.phlpa.ip.att.net [12.123.137.214]
 15    26 ms    20 ms    19 ms  tbr1-cl9.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.2.85]
 16    20 ms    18 ms    20 ms  12.122.80.45
 17    26 ms    18 ms    19 ms  192.205.34.42
 18    25 ms    25 ms    26 ms  if-5-0.core2.NTO-NewYork.teleglobe.net [216.6.51
.6]
 19    27 ms    27 ms    30 ms  216.6.97.38
 20    40 ms    39 ms    37 ms  if-9-0.core1.TTT-Scarborough.teleglobe.net [216.
6.57.34]
 21    41 ms    47 ms    39 ms  if-3-0.core2.TNK-Toronto.teleglobe.net [216.6.60
.6]
 22    44 ms    38 ms    37 ms  if-13-0.core1.TNK-Toronto.teleglobe.net [216.6.1
12.17]
 23    42 ms    41 ms    41 ms  ix-1-151.core1.TNK-Toronto.teleglobe.net [216.6.
112.22]
 24    39 ms    44 ms    40 ms  tigereye.ca [204.14.17.162]

Trace complete.
Looks good to me. I get a lot of hops (as per usual), but overall ping is comparable to TX.
Image
CronoDroid
Posts: 4606
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 8:00 am
Contact:

Post by CronoDroid »

Pinging tigereye.ca [204.14.17.162] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=271ms TTL=47
Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=47
Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=47
Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=47

Ping statistics for 204.14.17.162:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 271ms, Maximum = 273ms, Average = 272ms

---

Tracing route to tigereye.ca [204.14.17.162]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms home.gateway [192.168.1.254]
2 17 ms 19 ms 20 ms loop0.lns3.mel6.internode.on.net [150.101.212.45
]
3 18 ms 16 ms 16 ms gi0-3.cor1.mel3.internode.on.net [150.101.212.15
8]
4 182 ms 182 ms 181 ms pos2-1.bdr1.syd6.agile.on.net [150.101.212.86]
5 180 ms 182 ms 181 ms pos2-0.bdr1.lax1.agile.on.net [203.16.213.177]
6 184 ms 183 ms 184 ms sl-st20-la-8-0-0.sprintlink.net [144.223.44.9]
7 181 ms 183 ms 184 ms 144.232.9.54
8 271 ms 267 ms 268 ms yto-sa1.YTO.CA.net.DTAG.DE [62.154.5.201]
9 271 ms 268 ms 270 ms 217.6.24.194
10 272 ms 274 ms 271 ms mail.initechcomputers.com [204.14.17.162]

Trace complete.
Post Reply