Donald Trump
Do you mean to tell me that Abraham Lincoln didn't have a Ford pickup truck that he rolled coal with while firing random guns in the air screaming "MURICA" as the confederate battle flag attached to his truck rippled in the wind and his horn played "dixie"?

Don't find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain.
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Apr 1 2009, 09:35 PM) But I don't read the forums I only post.
Could be an entertaining movie combined with "Lincoln, Vampire Slayer"phoenix1 wrote:QUOTE (phoenix1 @ Jul 3 2018, 05:00 PM) Do you mean to tell me that Abraham Lincoln didn't have a Ford pickup truck that he rolled coal with while firing random guns in the air screaming "MURICA" as the confederate battle flag attached to his truck rippled in the wind and his horn played "dixie"?
*#$@faced $#@!tard Troll
Maybe in parts, but mostly he's wrong.minigun wrote:QUOTE (minigun @ Jul 11 2018, 07:57 PM) Trump calls germany a captive of Russia. I think he's right.
QUOTE Well, I have to say, I think it’s very sad when Germany makes a massive oil and gas deal with Russia, where you’re supposed to be guarding against Russia, and Germany goes out and pays billions and billions of dollars a year to Russia. So we’re protecting Germany. We’re protecting France. We’re protecting all of these countries. And then numerous of the countries go out and make a pipeline deal with Russia, where they’re paying billions of dollars into the coffers of Russia.So we’re protect you against Russia, but they’re paying billions of dollars to Russia, and I think that’s very inappropriate. And the former Chancellor of Germany is the head of the pipeline company that’s supplying the gas. Ultimately, Germany will have almost 70 percent of their country controlled by Russia with natural gas.
So you tell me, is that appropriate? I mean, I’ve been complaining about this from the time I got in. It should have never been allowed to have happened. But Germany is totally controlled by Russia, because they will be getting from 60 to 70 percent of their energy from Russia and a new pipeline. And you tell me if that’s appropriate, because I think it’s not, and I think it’s a very bad thing for NATO and I don’t think it should have happened. And I think we have to talk to Germany about it.[/quote]
Oil and Gas imports EU:
http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-ex..._oils_to_the_EU
http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-ex...lue_updated.png
Basically not only Germany depends on RU gas/oil imports, so does Italy, the Netherlands and Poland.
Schröder and Putin were buddies since he was chancellor, nobody in Germany likes it that he's involved into Gazprom (holds 51% of North Stream II) business after he left politics. Basically North Stream is a protecting Russian interest against current transit pipeline countries like not paying in time and shutting down transit to paying EU countries, of course Poland is not happy about it, because they won't earn anything for transit to other EU countries.
Germany (2017) primary energy resources (2015):
22.5% non-Russian oil
12% Russia oil
14.9% non-Russian natural gas
8.8% Russian natural gas
13.2% renewable energy
7.3% non-Russian stone coal
3.7% Russian stone coal
11.2% brown coal
6.1% nuclear power
Less than 25% market share doesn't mean total control...

Also the European countries depend since decades on Soviet/Russian gas...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russia_in ... rgy_sector
Anyway, overall Russia depends more on Germany (11% imports, 7.8% exports), than Germany depends on Russia (Russia is not even mentioned as export/import partner of Germany within the CIA World Fact Book).
QUOTE On top of that, Germany is just paying a little bit over 1 percent, whereas the United States, in actual numbers, is paying 4.2 percent of a much larger GDP. So I think that’s inappropriate also. You know, we’re protecting Germany, we’re protecting France. We’re protecting everybody. And yet we’re paying a lot of money to protect.[/quote]
Everyone in Germany noticed during the past years we have to spend more to our military equipment.
Trump forgets that the USA military operates worldwide and has non-NATO responsibilities (Pacific Fleet, AUS/NZ, Japan, South Korea, SPACE FORCE, ...). So why compare apples and oranges.
Overall the Baltic states and Poland asking for help against potential Russian aggression, not really the other NATO partners.
Last edited by pkk on Wed Jul 11, 2018 7:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Escapist (Justin Emerson) @ Dec 21 2010, 02:33 PM:
The history of open-source Allegiance is paved with the bodies of dead code branches, forum flame wars, and personal vendettas. But a community remains because people still love the game.
NATO countries close to Russia seem to be paying more to NATO. More then 2% or more of GDP. Germany pays 1.2% of GDP. United States spends 3.5% of GDP. Seems alot of countries don't play fair. China doesn't play fair in trading. There mad becouse there being called out on it finally. Maybe it's time to get rid of NATO.
Cry,'Havoc!' and let slip the dogs of war -Julius Ceasar


minigun wrote:QUOTE (minigun @ Jul 11 2018, 10:57 AM) Trump calls germany a captive of Russia. I think he's right.
"Germany is a captive of Russia. Also, we should remove the only known check on Russia's aggression in eastern Europe."minigun wrote:QUOTE (minigun @ Jul 11 2018, 01:51 PM) NATO countries close to Russia seem to be paying more to NATO. More then 2% or more of GDP. Germany pays 1.2% of GDP. United States spends 3.5% of GDP. Seems alot of countries don't play fair. China doesn't play fair in trading. There mad becouse there being called out on it finally. Maybe it's time to get rid of NATO.
Sometimes I wonder if trumpolos even think, or if stupid @#(! just pours out of their mouth like so much vomit.

Don't find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain.
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Apr 1 2009, 09:35 PM) But I don't read the forums I only post.
Imagine being this much of a @#(!stain that you feel you can lecture someone who grew up in the GDR what it's like to be controlled by Russia.
Meanwhile, back in the states, how $#@!ed are we? This $#@!ed.
Meanwhile, back in the states, how $#@!ed are we? This $#@!ed.
Globemaster_III wrote:QUOTE (Globemaster_III @ Jan 11 2018, 11:27 PM) as you know i think very little of cashto, cashto alway a flying low pilot, he alway flying a trainer airplane and he rented
i personally don't think this is going to have a long term impact. China can't sustain this level of protectionism, still being the developing economy that it is. their authoritarian government depends on the economy doing well and people getting richer as almost the only legitimizing factor. would they be able to pull a Putin and transition from results-oriented legitimization to nationalism-based appeasement? i doubt it as the Chinese people lack the history of having to suffer a deterioration of life conditions in the name of great power status. faced with the choice of market liberalization or prideful recession, i think the government will be forced to choose the former. lots of fascinating implications for China's future if they indeed choose that.cashto wrote:QUOTE (cashto @ Jul 11 2018, 07:03 PM) Imagine being this much of a @#(!stain that you feel you can lecture someone who grew up in the GDR what it's like to be controlled by Russia.
Meanwhile, back in the states, how $#@!ed are we? This $#@!ed.
but i could be wrong
JimmyNighthawk wrote:QUOTE (JimmyNighthawk @ Jun 30 2013, 11:32 PM) "Bavarian Sausage Anti-Ketchup Soap"[*]