Joystick and Inertial Dampers

Tactical advice, How-to, Post-mortem, etc.
Adept
Posts: 8660
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Turku, Finland

Post by Adept »

TurkeyXIII wrote:QUOTE (TurkeyXIII @ Apr 1 2010, 06:43 PM) The ships in Allegiance all have a maximum rate of rotation. Real objects in space would not have such a limitation, so the torque (AKA forces that change rotation) would play a for more prominent role in maneuvers. In Allegiance, the rotation limits are all low enough that even the heaviest ships can usually stop rotating after only a couple of seconds.
A real spacecraft has to be roll limiters too, or the pilot(s) will be quickly incapasitated. I Once worked out some of the forces in an Allegiance ship cockpit, and it would be a pretty wild ride. :cool:
ImageImageImageImageImage
<bp|> Maybe when I grow up I can be a troll like PsycH
<bp|> or an obsessive compulsive paladin of law like Adept
Jimen
Posts: 1146
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 10:39 pm
Location: Boston-ish

Post by Jimen »

That is what the fancy cushions are for! People don't fly ints constantly because they like to whore, they do so because those seats are comfy beyond belief such that the face-crushing acceleration of boosting only allows you to experience such pleasantness further.
Image
Adept
Posts: 8660
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Turku, Finland

Post by Adept »

Jimen wrote:QUOTE (Jimen @ Apr 3 2010, 12:08 PM) That is what the fancy cushions are for! People don't fly ints constantly because they like to whore, they do so because those seats are comfy beyond belief such that the face-crushing acceleration of boosting only allows you to experience such pleasantness further.
The sad thing is by the way that the boosting accel in Allegiance is pretty modest. Sure it would be fun and all, but the horrible moments are when spinning the ship along the other axis. Then you're being pushed forward into your restraining belts as the ship spins around the center of it's mass. A real int jockey could well want to keep boosting in the tight turns just to keep his/her arse on the seat!
Last edited by Adept on Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
ImageImageImageImageImage
<bp|> Maybe when I grow up I can be a troll like PsycH
<bp|> or an obsessive compulsive paladin of law like Adept
TurkeyXIII
Posts: 1460
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 3:18 am
Location: Melbourne, Aus

Post by TurkeyXIII »

My maths disagrees with you, Adept. The IC int gives the pilot 0.32 g into the harness at maximum rate of turn. Slightly uncomfortable I'd imagine, but horrible is a bit of an overstatement. The highest centripetal acceleration of the 7 ships I looked at was the dreg corv, delivering 0.53 g when spinning.

When the int boosts, the linear acceleration gives the pilot 4.95 g into their seat. Also tolerable if you're fit enough, but substantially larger than from the rotation.

I'm yet to look at tangential acceleration from maneuvering thrusters.

g = acceleration due to gravity on earth's surface = 9.8 m/s/s.
QUOTE (Randall Munroe)14.2: Turkey consumption rate of the average American in milligrams per minute[/quote]
Image
Koln
Posts: 2769
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:26 am
Location: Granada, Spain

Post by Koln »

TurkeyXIII wrote:QUOTE (TurkeyXIII @ Apr 3 2010, 04:20 PM) My maths disagrees with you, Adept. The IC int gives the pilot 0.32 g into the harness at maximum rate of turn. Slightly uncomfortable I'd imagine, but horrible is a bit of an overstatement. The highest centripetal acceleration of the 7 ships I looked at was the dreg corv, delivering 0.53 g when spinning.

When the int boosts, the linear acceleration gives the pilot 4.95 g into their seat. Also tolerable if you're fit enough, but substantially larger than from the rotation.

I'm yet to look at tangential acceleration from maneuvering thrusters.

g = acceleration due to gravity on earth's surface = 9.8 m/s/s.
I think adept was thinking more on the direction of the accel rather than the magnitude. 0.32g to a side that is not the back of the seat would be a mess if you don't have a good safety belt :P .
Image
Image ACS grad since 2nd Feb. 2010
TurkeyXIII
Posts: 1460
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 3:18 am
Location: Melbourne, Aus

Post by TurkeyXIII »

Even so, you get 1.24 g into the harness just from hitting the reverse thrusters.
QUOTE (Randall Munroe)14.2: Turkey consumption rate of the average American in milligrams per minute[/quote]
Image
Adept
Posts: 8660
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Turku, Finland

Post by Adept »

TurkeyXIII wrote:QUOTE (TurkeyXIII @ Apr 3 2010, 06:23 PM) Even so, you get 1.24 g into the harness just from hitting the reverse thrusters.
It's also possible I did very sloppy work at the time :doh:

Still I wonder how much of a vomit comet it would be, taking a couple of rapid 90 - 180 degree turns and hitthing the boostes and retros in an interceptor furball.
ImageImageImageImageImage
<bp|> Maybe when I grow up I can be a troll like PsycH
<bp|> or an obsessive compulsive paladin of law like Adept
jpomailo2
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:49 pm
Location: Canada

Post by jpomailo2 »

Need anti-inertia.
Jpomail > Does weed always type like that?
FreeBeer > No, no. Sometimes he uses his fingers.
____________________________________________
Zdude > I'm moving on. In fact... there's this girl who may be a little on the ugly side but is pretty easy
____________________________________________
Penix: .... jop never reproduce please.
Bard
Posts: 4263
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:00 am
Location: Within your command center, enacting fatal attacks upon your conscripts
Contact:

Post by Bard »

Adept wrote:QUOTE (Adept @ Apr 3 2010, 03:19 PM) Still I wonder how much of a vomit comet it would be


Five and you wash out of Cadet. XD
ImageImageImageImageImage
Image Omnia Mutantur, Nihil Interit.
Post Reply