Suggestion: Reduce points for kills

Development area for FreeAllegiance's Community Core.
Broodwich
Posts: 5662
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 3:48 am
Location: Raincity

Post by Broodwich »

how would reducing points gained by kills suddenly make things like scouting score as many points?
QUOTE Drizzo: ha ha good old chap
Drizzo: i am a brit
Drizzo: tut tut
Drizzo: wankarrrrrr
Drizzo: i only have sex whilst in the missionary position[/quote] Fas est et ab hoste doceri - Ovid
Xeretov
Posts: 1633
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:50 pm
Location: Canada

Post by Xeretov »

gr4vity wrote:QUOTE (gr4vity @ Dec 9 2009, 02:14 PM) utility roles
You do realize that the only "utility" roles that give points are scouting and pod rescues, right?

It doesn't include probing, or nanning, or babysitting miners, or sitting a scout uneyed in their home to see things, or any other very useful "utility role". And that once the map is scouted the only thing besides kills that gives points would be pickups.

I'm not arguing that this should or shouldn't be done (because I don't care tbh) but if you look at the scores for any given game, the utility players would still have the same total points. And it really isn't that much, so the players getting kills would still be at the top unless you removed points for kills entirely. The margin would just be slightly smaller otherwise.

So here's my question: Do you think that reducing (or removing) points for kills is going to bring utility players into equity on the points screen, when after 15-20 mins the only thing giving them points are pod pickups?

Or that inflating the scouting & pickup rewards are going to encourage the real utility roles like probing?
Last edited by Xeretov on Wed Dec 09, 2009 9:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Adept
Posts: 8660
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Turku, Finland

Post by Adept »

Xeretov wrote:QUOTE (Xeretov @ Dec 9 2009, 11:46 PM) Or that inflating the scouting & pickup rewards are going to encourage the real utility roles like probing?
And how does one reward probing points that doesn't just amount to prices for probe artists?

When your probe eyes a bomber or a miner, good for you... but it would probably be an enormous hassle to try and make the point system reflect that... and not worth the amount of work anyway.
ImageImageImageImageImage
<bp|> Maybe when I grow up I can be a troll like PsycH
<bp|> or an obsessive compulsive paladin of law like Adept
Sonic
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 2:52 am
Location: Kamloops, BC

Post by Sonic »

Why should I care about something that has absolutely no affect on anything in this game?
ImageImage
gr4vity
Posts: 2251
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 7:00 am
Location: irc

Post by gr4vity »

Brood - It doesn't and I have no idea wth you even asked that.
Xeretov wrote:QUOTE (Xeretov @ Dec 9 2009, 04:46 PM) You do realize that the only "utility" roles that give points are scouting and pod rescues, right?

It doesn't include probing, or nanning, or babysitting miners, or sitting a scout uneyed in their home to see things, or any other very useful "utility role". And that once the map is scouted the only thing besides kills that gives points would be pickups.

I'm not arguing that this should or shouldn't be done (because I don't care tbh) but if you look at the scores for any given game, the utility players would still have the same total points. And it really isn't that much, so the players getting kills would still be at the top unless you removed points for kills entirely. The margin would just be slightly smaller otherwise.

So here's my question: Do you think that reducing (or removing) points for kills is going to bring utility players into equity on the points screen, when after 15-20 mins the only thing giving them points are pod pickups?

Or that inflating the scouting & pickup rewards are going to encourage the real utility roles like probing?
To answer your question: Probably not equity in very long games but at least somewhat closer to the top. Besides pod pick-ups they can also get points for picking Tech, eyeing enemy bases and cash-boxes or am I mistaken here?

Concerning the small margin you mention - if we reward less and less points the more kills you get it might not be that small anymore. In the end - I say it once more - the whole idea behind this to get the scout fraction some more attention in the end game screen with a minimum amount of work on the core dev side. :D :iluv:
ImageImage
"WyldKarde@RT: It's like the Picard Manouver, but with more hair."
Broodwich
Posts: 5662
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 3:48 am
Location: Raincity

Post by Broodwich »

lol grav stop trying to troll
QUOTE Drizzo: ha ha good old chap
Drizzo: i am a brit
Drizzo: tut tut
Drizzo: wankarrrrrr
Drizzo: i only have sex whilst in the missionary position[/quote] Fas est et ab hoste doceri - Ovid
omegahero
Posts: 1521
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2007 6:56 pm
Location: Corellia

Post by omegahero »

next on the agenda: removing interceptors from brood's f4 screen :lol:
Image
Mastametz
Posts: 4798
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:00 am
Location: Stanwood, WA

Post by Mastametz »

I like how the % of active whores (mainly int whores) in the game has never been lower than it is at this point in time, yet we're talking about reducing the points awarded for kills to discourage int whoring.

Here's a better idea - triple the amount of points awarded for kills.

You don't need to probe/nan/support-this/jackass-that if you're camping all the enemy's red doors.
There's a new sheriff in town.
Sushi
Posts: 405
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 7:00 am

Post by Sushi »

Let me pull a Slap:

1. I spend a hefty chunk of my time in utility roles.
2. I'm nothing special: in fact, I think I'm about as "average" as you can get for a player.
3. I still somehow manage to get toward the top of the leaderboard fairly often.

Therefore:
4. As far as I can tell, utility players still get rewarded... although frankly, I'd rather have recognition than points as a reward for a good job. ;)


Dagnabit, that was too short. Unban Slap!
RealPandemonium
Posts: 649
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 7:32 am
Location: NY

Post by RealPandemonium »

who gives a @#(! about points
Image IMO
Edmond wrote:QUOTE (Edmond @ Aug 31 2010, 04:20 PM) I think girly's idea is much better, since it is more freeform, only needs to be updated by one person, and maintains the openness of the command channel without the spaminess. Plus it can have ASCII goatse.
Post Reply