Should we put a governor on rank?

Sycrus · Post by **Sycrus** » Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:54 am

No Gov on rank, it would be false. Look at Apoch, he started a few months before I did and can take me any day.

Malicious Wraith · Post by **Malicious Wraith** » Thu Oct 11, 2007 1:34 pm

Do I need to even post in this thread?

Just imagine what I would say, saves me some time.

jgbaxter · Post by **jgbaxter** » Thu Oct 11, 2007 1:48 pm

Sycrus wrote:QUOTE (Sycrus @ Oct 10 2007, 10:54 PM) No Gov on rank, it would be false. Look at Apoch, he started a few months before I did and can take me any day.

So the odd rare exception for someone like Apoch that doesn't probe the rule makes it somehow better then the 95% where having the governor to rank would be more accurate, brilliant. There are Inter7's that don't know what a nan is, that alone is telling.

I've actually been thinking that it might be more beneficial to instead of using a governor to instead take the average or rank and age. At least it would be more palatable to some... of course I wonder if that's the best choice, it would definately be helpful for returning vets after any reset.

deathgoat · Post by **deathgoat** » Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:00 pm

i like the idea of incorporating age into rank.... it would both slow down n00b rankings.. and give longtime players credit for time served..