Mutiny and R.O.C.

Ozricosis · Post by **Ozricosis** » Thu Sep 06, 2007 6:32 pm

I feel like booting the ex-commander is only needed if the ex-commander wont shut up about being mutinied and play the game.

But in the instance you are talking about here, it could have been the same person coming back and booting you... and that's not cool.

Whatever.

#mutiny

YAR!

Vlymoxyd · Post by **Vlymoxyd** » Thu Sep 06, 2007 6:38 pm

I'm with Ozzy on that one...

ImmortalZ · Post by **ImmortalZ** » Thu Sep 06, 2007 7:07 pm

I'm with Vly on that one.

Your_Persona · Post by **Your_Persona** » Thu Sep 06, 2007 7:29 pm

aye, there is nothing to see here, move along.

ryjamsan · Post by **ryjamsan** » Thu Sep 06, 2007 7:37 pm

I like the munity vote but is there a way to limit how many times it can be called per game? This will be the most abuse function ever next to #resign. I thank that Frag was wrong. I saw no reason to resign. Just because you feel the game is lost doesnt mean everyone does. I miss the days of great comebacks. We have all been part of great comebacks. But those days are over. Now we resign when our op dies or a miner. When we seee the other team with HINTs we say ah its over! You should only resign when you tech base is gone and there is no hope of getting it back. You should resign if you feel the other team has no intention of bombing and is just whoring. Please bring sanity back to #resign. I agree that some people dont want to (in thier opinion) waiste 2 hours on a lost cause but sometimes thats the greatest comeback of all times. If you was playing football would you quit with the score 21-0 at halftime? i think not!

Anmd some vets are killing the command pool! By stacking b4 or after the game starts I think all games should be played with imbal set to auto for a week. Perhaps this willl help ending vet stacking. the max point diff should be 25 so you dont end up with 3 or 4 players down because 1 team happens to have a 25 on thier team:)

Just my thoughts!

ImmortalZ · Post by **ImmortalZ** » Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:07 pm

OMG, he said HINT!

Nooooooooooooo!!!!

CraftyCelt · Post by **CraftyCelt** » Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:09 pm

mmmm boots

revirdraw · Post by **revirdraw** » Thu Sep 06, 2007 8:33 pm

ImmortalZ wrote:QUOTE (ImmortalZ @ Sep 6 2007, 01:07 PM) OMG, he said HINT!

You bastard!

South Park refrence, for those who don't get it.

Fragtzack · Post by **Fragtzack** » Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:02 pm

Doobie, sounds like you want blood. Can you propse a punishment to satisfy you?

Your looking to punish because of #10 of the ROC. Here is the excerpt from the ROC:

" #10 You may not engage in "retaliatory booting". Ejecting anyone from the team or game in response to perceived slights or attacks is not permitted. This includes prearranged â€œBoot On Sightâ€

IB_ · Post by **IB_** » Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:55 pm

ryjamsan wrote:QUOTE (ryjamsan @ Sep 6 2007, 12:37 PM) If you was playing football would you quit with the score 21-0 at halftime?

Yes. Highly doubtful you would score 22 goals in the second half /tongue.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":P" border="0" alt="tongue.gif" />