Page 3 of 7
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 7:11 pm
by Death3D
You might be on to something, ang. /mrgreen.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="mrgreen.gif" />
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:11 pm
by Rand0m_Numb3r
Death it would be so easy to annihilate nix if you couldn't nan cons/miners, prox + ram without ability to nan and cannot dock cuz of ram
nix dosnt need a nerf as far as it stands but Jimmy is returning and will find any problems balance wise /mrgreen.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="mrgreen.gif" />
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:27 pm
by wizard58
Anguirel wrote:QUOTE (Anguirel @ Feb 20 2007, 07:39 PM) Sure, but then they also couldn't be repaired. Might as well toss them on cons next and get rid of nanites for Phoenix completely.
But how about the bases they will need to be repaired after a bomb run , except of course if u throw in base assault shields .
Imagine a adv tech base with 10k shield power /blink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":o" border="0" alt="blink.gif" />
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:23 pm
by Rand0m_Numb3r
you know i would like ass3 for regen rate with my nix freighter with hyperburst
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 3:34 am
by CronoDroid
Nix is still cheese.
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:46 pm
by Rand0m_Numb3r
nix is not cheese it requires like 3x more teamwork
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:47 am
by CronoDroid
By 3x more teamwork I assume you mean requires a stack and a good commander because most players will not fly for that piece of @#(!! And most commanders can't command Nix, what's wrong with playing it like every other faction rather than rushing Starbase? WTF...
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 4:19 pm
by Dengaroth
Wow... Crono reads
what Ang writes.
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:18 pm
by Rand0m_Numb3r
Wow Deng post in a dev forum for a core he never plays, and productive as usual.
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:18 pm
by Dengaroth
Rand0m_Numb3r wrote:QUOTE (Rand0m_Numb3r @ Feb 27 2007, 06:18 PM) Wow Deng post in a dev forum for a core he never plays...
How would you know? Do you have access to the alias lookup tool?
...didn't think so.
Rand0m_Numb3r wrote:QUOTE (Rand0m_Numb3r @ Feb 27 2007, 06:18 PM) ...and productive as usual.
It's been shown plenty of times that there is no point in being productive in this particular subforum (and by God,
I've tried...
often enough).