Page 3 of 5
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 4:14 pm
by Cortex
I'm pleading for removing the '[extract]' tag. I'm reading blogs with my RSS reader *only* and seeing only extracts in the feeds is annoying. /sad.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":sad:" border="0" alt="sad.gif" />
-- Cort
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 5:04 pm
by Pook
The enhancements to the ignore were one of the things that wouldn't survive an upgrade, so yes I'll have to code those back in.
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 5:07 pm
by Pook
Cortex wrote:QUOTE (Cortex @ Dec 10 2006, 10:14 AM) I'm pleading for removing the '[extract]' tag. I'm reading blogs with my RSS reader *only* and seeing only extracts in the feeds is annoying. /sad.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":sad:" border="0" alt="sad.gif" />
-- Cort
Huh?
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 5:22 pm
by Cortex
Pook wrote:QUOTE (Pook @ Dec 10 2006, 06:07 PM) Huh?
It wasn't a completely serious request because I know most people won't agree.
The BBCode documentation of that tag says: "This will allow users to define an extract for an entry. Only this piece of the entry will be displayed on the main blog page and will show up in the RSS feed."
Now here's the long version of how I'm reading my blogs:
I add the RSS feeds to a tool called SunriseXP. Each time I'm synching my Palm, the SunriseXP conduit will check all the feeds for changes. In the case of a change, it generates a new Plucker file and transfers it on the Palm. And at some time later, usually in a boring lecture, I'll start reading them. Of course I am offline then and blogs like
Guide van Rossum's where each entry is just a one-liner with a link are completely useless.
More than actually wanting it removed, I'd like to ask people just not to use it unless they really have a reason to.
-- Cort
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 5:40 pm
by Cortex
In the RT forum, we have a thread with 1 reply (mine) but 0 views. Might be an old bug / imprecise counting, but might also be a misconfiguration.
PS: 3 replies, 0 views now.
-- Cort
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 5:49 pm
by badpazzword
Cort, I reproduced the bug:
Before I view the post to this thread:
QUOTE Poll: Hider Nicks 14 ArcAngel 229 Today, 05:36 PM Last post by: Ozricosis[/quote]
I open the post and reload the index:
QUOTE Poll: Hider Nicks 14 ArcAngel 229 Today, 05:36 PM Last post by: Ozricosis[/quote]
After I vote:
QUOTE Poll: Hider Nicks 14 ArcAngel 229 Today, 05:36 PM Last post by: Ozricosis[/quote]
After I post:
QUOTE Poll: Hider Nicks 15 ArcAngel 229 Today, 06:48 PM Last post by: badpazzword[/quote]
Where the underlined number is the number of views.
NO, I haven't opened the post before.
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 5:54 pm
by Pook
We've talked this one before - post views are cached and don't update/refresh immediately. it's one of the options on the boards under the "saving resources" section.
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2006 5:56 pm
by Cortex
Pook wrote:QUOTE (Pook @ Dec 10 2006, 06:54 PM) We've talked this one before - post views are cached and don't update/refresh immediately. it's one of the options on the boards under the "saving resources" section.
'ra, didn't know that.
-- Cort
Posted: Mon Dec 11, 2006 5:09 am
by Psychosis
wow, learn something everyday.
and pook, i promise not to cause to much trouble till next year if you can bring the ignore back!!!
/unsure.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":unsure:" border="0" alt="unsure.gif" /> i will hug a nuub every day! then push him through a camped aleph /mrgreen.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="mrgreen.gif" />
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 4:26 pm
by madpeople
post counts are updated when you post right?
its just i saw some new guy with a post count of 1, who had posted 7 times.
cant remember who though. i only noticed because he had 2 posts in the same thread.