Thanks for all the responses. Basically I think there is a whole tech tree there that screams for more use.
Pook:
I think getting the cap to rip to TP2 is a bigger problem...and in any case we can tweak the rip time.
Tmc:
Yes, Plus caps are not easily nanned, so weaker MFs and Cruisers would
essentially be either a) dog food

going back to nan trains. That needs to be
addressed in the final design, whatever it'd be.
Raveen:
I think I would keep things the same as much as I can
because I don't see a problem with the basic setup requiring a
secondary base. I don't want to invent an independent tech path
that doesn't require a special rock.
I don't think unfamiliarity is a long term issue, but cost and strength
are. Of strength, the problem is advanced tech is so good it gets it done
without needing caps, and once you realize you are stuck without caps - you
don't have any money for them! So it boils down to cost again.
Badger:
We are talking classic Alleg/Plus shipyard, not DN shipyard.
Terra:
Plus caps are balanced vs all three techs. They are good vs tac and exp, ok vs sup.
So that's not much of a problem.
Regardless though, you may have a very good idea there. Level 3 ships in Drydock??
That'd instantly make shipyard VERY popular.
Pedro:
Again that's DN stuff.. classic Allegiance shipyard is different. But I'm thinking of
something along those lines. Money per nuke could be a very good idea. This ties in what
TMC said: there is no sense in making base destroyers too much like bombers, so MF and Cruiser
should keep their relative strengths (although I think we can safely lower Cruiser HP to about 4500
since it's super heavy hull and keep its functionality intact, and significantly chop the price)
We can still make them even cheaper and add $ cost to each nuke to make it expensive to go all out with them, but they'd be cheap for single base kills.
Keep them coming.. I'll mull on this some more and post a prototype for us to discuss.