Donald Trump

Non-Allegiance related. High probability of spam. Pruned regularly.
Mastametz
Posts: 4798
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:00 am
Location: Stanwood, WA

Post by Mastametz »

Honestly Hillary should have just stayed a registered Republican she'd be killing it right now as the republican president.


but she had to change to a D to be with Bill so she could have the career she has and show how much a strong independent woman she is because her career is just an extension of Bill's. lol.
Last edited by Mastametz on Thu Dec 07, 2017 6:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
There's a new sheriff in town.
zombywoof
Posts: 6523
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:59 am
Location: Over the Rainbow

Post by zombywoof »

Globemaster_III wrote:QUOTE (Globemaster_III @ Dec 7 2017, 09:38 AM) You just realize that ?
No. I knew this vote was doomed from the start and actually condemned it from the minute I heard he was going to do it... late tuesday night. I even sent a letter to my congressperson imploring him to vote "no" for the sake of the US constitution.

Your post is still absurdly stupid because it seems to believe that somehow this is a harbinger of the end of the Mueller investigation.

By the by, the last time a sitting president fired a special prosecutor who was investigating him? Richard Nixon. It was followed by the resignation of like four major members of his cabinet and less than a year later he was resigning to avoid impeachment. The only reason Nixon wasn't then indicted was due to a presidential pardon by Ford. That presidential pardon is literally the reason Jimmy Carter, the democrat, won the following election.

If Trump tries to fire the special prosecutor, he *will* be impeached unless he gives a very, very, VERY good reason for doing so. "Mueller is getting too close to the truth" is not a good reason. In fact, given Mueller's credentials and relationship with the GOP, it's spectacularly unlikely that he would ever do something that comes close to being a good reason to fire him. I am very confident that Mueller is running a tight ship over there.

Trump's camp is now flailing to discredit Mueller which, like the attempt to discredit Comey, will backfire immensely. *You* will be convinced, but you're the kind of frothingly blind trump fellatiator who can't ever be convinced. The 20-30% of America that's too busy gobbling trump cock will be convinced. Fortunately; however, we live in a democracy so the 80-70% of America that hasn't decided to switch their brains off because they've a huge crush on an overgrown tangerine with tiny hands. The members of the House and Senate would never be convinced that firing Mueller was "appropriate."

What we saw in the congressional vote on Wednesday was confirmation that the majority of the Democratic party believes in Country over Party, that the majority of House Democrats will not vote to impeach trump unless there is a constitutionally legitimate set of articles of impeachment brought against him. And I'm proud of those Democrats. I'm proud of the fact that they didn't vote to impeach: it's not time for that. Yet. It may never be time for that, it may be that the Mueller investigation turns up nothing.

No legal expert I've read anything by thinks the Mueller investigation will turn up nothing, by the way. There's an awful lot of smoke coming out for there to be no fire.
Image
Don't find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain.
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Apr 1 2009, 09:35 PM) But I don't read the forums I only post.
zombywoof
Posts: 6523
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:59 am
Location: Over the Rainbow

Post by zombywoof »

Or, TL/DR:

If Metz and/or Globey were in my political science class, they'd likely be getting Fs and a recommendation that they change their major.
Image
Don't find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain.
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Apr 1 2009, 09:35 PM) But I don't read the forums I only post.
Mastametz
Posts: 4798
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:00 am
Location: Stanwood, WA

Post by Mastametz »

I'd get an A consistent with my 4.0 GPA from when I last wasted time in college.
There's a new sheriff in town.
Globemaster_III
Posts: 1447
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:00 am
Location: little whore house in texas

Post by Globemaster_III »

phoenix1 wrote:QUOTE (phoenix1 @ Dec 8 2017, 06:11 AM) No. I knew this vote was doomed from the start and actually condemned it from the minute I heard he was going to do it... late tuesday night. I even sent a letter to my congressperson imploring him to vote "no" for the sake of the US constitution.

Your post is still absurdly stupid because it seems to believe that somehow this is a harbinger of the end of the Mueller investigation.

By the by, the last time a sitting president fired a special prosecutor who was investigating him? Richard Nixon. It was followed by the resignation of like four major members of his cabinet and less than a year later he was resigning to avoid impeachment. The only reason Nixon wasn't then indicted was due to a presidential pardon by Ford. That presidential pardon is literally the reason Jimmy Carter, the democrat, won the following election.

If Trump tries to fire the special prosecutor, he *will* be impeached unless he gives a very, very, VERY good reason for doing so. "Mueller is getting too close to the truth" is not a good reason. In fact, given Mueller's credentials and relationship with the GOP, it's spectacularly unlikely that he would ever do something that comes close to being a good reason to fire him. I am very confident that Mueller is running a tight ship over there.

Trump's camp is now flailing to discredit Mueller which, like the attempt to discredit Comey, will backfire immensely. *You* will be convinced, but you're the kind of frothingly blind trump fellatiator who can't ever be convinced. The 20-30% of America that's too busy gobbling trump cock will be convinced. Fortunately; however, we live in a democracy so the 80-70% of America that hasn't decided to switch their brains off because they've a huge crush on an overgrown tangerine with tiny hands. The members of the House and Senate would never be convinced that firing Mueller was "appropriate."

What we saw in the congressional vote on Wednesday was confirmation that the majority of the Democratic party believes in Country over Party, that the majority of House Democrats will not vote to impeach trump unless there is a constitutionally legitimate set of articles of impeachment brought against him. And I'm proud of those Democrats. I'm proud of the fact that they didn't vote to impeach: it's not time for that. Yet. It may never be time for that, it may be that the Mueller investigation turns up nothing.

No legal expert I've read anything by thinks the Mueller investigation will turn up nothing, by the way. There's an awful lot of smoke coming out for there to be no fire.


nix1..democrats are weak and can't do anythings about it, like Obama does
surely you know President D trump can stop mueller's inv if he want to
there will be no impeachment cause democrats are un-inform an ill-prepare ass democrats of texas
nix1 i am in question of your 3.9 :)
MagisterXF94
Posts: 1935
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2013 9:46 am
Location: Trieste, Italy

Post by MagisterXF94 »

Globemaster_III wrote:QUOTE (Globemaster_III @ Dec 7 2017, 10:20 PM) nix1..democrats are weak and can't do anythings about it, like Obama does
surely you know President D trump can stop mueller's inv if he want to
there will be no impeachment cause democrats are un-inform an ill-prepare ass democrats of texas
nix1 i am in question of your 3.9 :)
Do you recall what transpired when another POTUS fired a special prosecutor?

#resign
QUOTE ^cashto@Elem (all): yeah, i imagine if you're rusty, you could build op short for no reason, build a naked ref, then go two techpaths even though your mining is by all objective standards $#@!ed[/quote]
Image
Globemaster_III
Posts: 1447
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:00 am
Location: little whore house in texas

Post by Globemaster_III »

phoenix1 wrote:QUOTE (phoenix1 @ Dec 8 2017, 06:13 AM) Or, TL/DR:

If Metz and/or Globey were in my political science class, they'd likely be getting Fs and a recommendation that they change their major.


If i was in your political science class, you all be in mental health hospitals :) .
Globemaster_III
Posts: 1447
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:00 am
Location: little whore house in texas

Post by Globemaster_III »

Senor NoirSol wrote:QUOTE (Senor NoirSol @ Dec 8 2017, 08:27 AM) Do you recall what transpired when another POTUS fired a special prosecutor?

#resign

and ? :)
peet
Posts: 4972
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 6:57 pm
Location: Holland

Post by peet »

Trump has an interesting strategy. The average politician would tip-toe in the minefield of the Middle East, careful avoiding tripping one. Trump seems to put on XXL shoes while running.
Image
Raveen
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Birmingham, UK
Contact:

Post by Raveen »

Sheriff Metz wrote:QUOTE (Sheriff Metz @ Dec 7 2017, 06:16 PM) Trump is not the savior of America, the democrats, the republicans, or anyone else - just himself. I don't get why republicans rally around him so much when he's not even very conservative in the first place. In fact he's desperately liberal in a lot of aspects.
Mostly because they know that he'll set up a separate party if he gets thrown out by the Republicans and take a substantial amount of their voter base with him because it's unwaveringly dedicated to him personally. Enough to ruin all their careful gerrymandering certainly.
ImageImage
Spidey: Can't think of a reason I'd need to know anything
Post Reply