Page 18 of 21
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:14 am
by raumvogel
What the world needs now is more graphs and charts.
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:22 am
by lexaal
R > 0.95
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:29 am
by MrChaos
... never mind it was a rhetorical question and @#(!
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:07 am
by Viscur
God damn republic of panda humpers always misreporting their data. But god bless them for humping pandas.
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:55 pm
by StinkerTod
Adept wrote:QUOTE (Adept @ Dec 21 2012, 11:40 AM) Are you kidding me? Something that is smack on the trend line like that is pretty much the opposite of an outlier.
Go back to school

An extreme case =/= outlier.
If anything the graph is suspiciously neat, but I'd like to see you challenge the basic implication of more guns => more people getting shot.
Anyway. I didn't come here to feed the trolls but to share this for some food for thought.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_count...ated_death_rate
Finland's place on that list is nothing to be proud of... but I suppose I can be happy about the fact that my countrymen mostly use their guns to shoot themselves rather than anybody else.
You dumb think that more guns more gun crime only based on more guns take out the us and see how the graph will look like then start looking at reasons why and how its like saying that global warming is caused only by increase of co2 in the air and putting a blind eye onto the Adeptific explanation of underlying mechanism Blind fool remains being a blind fool throwing around science like its religion or smth
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 1:03 pm
by StinkerTod
MrChaos wrote:QUOTE (MrChaos @ Dec 21 2012, 06:33 PM) ....
Justifying Adepts troll much time spending you are point you explained mine was he thrown up a graph with no explanation trying to point his trollpoint. Glad that you educated some less in the know on the forum and godmighty doublepost mine should bring the blessing of understanding!
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 1:11 pm
by MrChaos
* MrChaos capers about making monkey noises out his bruised all to @#(! face while bleeding profusely from a kidney wound inflicted from a knife *
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 5:52 pm
by HSharp
So NRA blames movies and videogames, no surprise there. The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is with a good guy with a gun. Two issues.
1) How do you know if someone is good/bad (see Adept)
2) A bad guy without a gun is probably even easier to stop.
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 6:07 pm
by Hellsyng
1) Why do you need to differentiate when the bad guy dies after he starts shooting and immediately gets shot by a good guy who then holsters his gun?
2) Bad guys will acquire a gun if they really want one.
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 6:24 pm
by HSharp
Hellsyng wrote:QUOTE (Hellsyng @ Dec 22 2012, 06:07 PM) 1) Why do you need to differentiate when the bad guy dies after he starts shooting and immediately gets shot by a good guy who then holsters his gun?
Why don't you have reading comprehension? I am saying how do you know if a person is good or bad before you give them a gun? There are cases of security guards going crazy and killing people.
QUOTE 2) Bad guys will acquire a gun if they really want one.[/quote]
But why make it easy for them?