https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/15/us/p ... .html?_r=0
And this just in.
Donald Trump
The question is, what Trump or whoever defines as highly classified intelligence...
Maybe it's completely nonsense.
Maybe it's completely nonsense.
The Escapist (Justin Emerson) @ Dec 21 2010, 02:33 PM:
The history of open-source Allegiance is paved with the bodies of dead code branches, forum flame wars, and personal vendettas. But a community remains because people still love the game.
-
Globemaster_III
- Posts: 1447
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:00 am
- Location: little whore house in texas
This just in. Breaking. This man might be the final straw showing Trump's Russian connection:
http://www.npr.org/2017/05/16/528104260 ... moking-gun
http://www.npr.org/2017/05/16/528104260 ... moking-gun
Last edited by ryujin on Tue May 16, 2017 4:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*#$@faced $#@!tard Troll
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/16/us/w ... .html?_r=0Papsmear wrote:QUOTE (Papsmear @ May 16 2017, 05:32 AM) https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/15/us/p ... .html?_r=0
And this just in.
Particularly this damning defense of the President:
"In private, three administration officials conceded that they could not publicly articulate their most compelling — and honest — defense of the president: that Mr. Trump, a hasty and indifferent reader of printed briefing materials, simply did not possess the interest or knowledge of the granular details of intelligence gathering to leak specific sources and methods of intelligence gathering that would do harm to United States allies."

Don't find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain.
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Apr 1 2009, 09:35 PM) But I don't read the forums I only post.
He's the gift that just keeps on giving.phoenix1 wrote:QUOTE (phoenix1 @ May 16 2017, 12:26 PM) "In private, three administration officials conceded that they could not publicly articulate their most compelling — and honest — defense of the president: that Mr. Trump, a hasty and indifferent reader of printed briefing materials, simply did not possess the interest or knowledge of the granular details of intelligence gathering to leak specific sources and methods of intelligence gathering that would do harm to United States allies."
I may go back to my earlier theory that Trump is a deep-cover Democratic operative with a mission to utterly and thoroughly discredit the Republican Party for an entire generation.
Globemaster_III wrote:QUOTE (Globemaster_III @ Jan 11 2018, 11:27 PM) as you know i think very little of cashto, cashto alway a flying low pilot, he alway flying a trainer airplane and he rented
How anyone can still support this president is beyond me. He's doing severe damage to our country and the world now and future. It's insane he's been allowed to stay in office this long. Congress is absolutely useless and has been for ages. We need a revolt.phoenix1 wrote:QUOTE (phoenix1 @ May 16 2017, 12:26 PM) https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/16/us/w ... .html?_r=0
Particularly this damning defense of the President:
"In private, three administration officials conceded that they could not publicly articulate their most compelling — and honest — defense of the president: that Mr. Trump, a hasty and indifferent reader of printed briefing materials, simply did not possess the interest or knowledge of the granular details of intelligence gathering to leak specific sources and methods of intelligence gathering that would do harm to United States allies."



