Page 12 of 13
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:54 pm
by FreeBeer
Tigereye wrote:QUOTE (Tigereye @ Feb 1 2007, 03:21 AM) FYI the server's been bought.
*writes cheque*
Pay to the order of: Tigereye
Mail to: Mississauga, Ontario. Meh... can't be too many Tigereyes in Miss.... Canada Post is sure to deliver it. /tongue.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":P" border="0" alt="tongue.gif" />
Posted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:59 pm
by ImmortalZ
Canada post delivers to H0 H0 H0. Name : Santa Claus. Surely they can deliver to Tigereye.
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 7:59 am
by Tigereye
ImmortalZ wrote:QUOTE (ImmortalZ @ Feb 1 2007, 11:46 AM) Dual Opty 2.2Ghz? Whoa TE, that is major overkill. Maybe you can sell some of that processor power?
I've already got other plans for it /mrgreen.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="mrgreen.gif" />
Allegiance being hosted on this thing was a sort of afterthought. /wink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink.gif" />
--TE
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 9:44 am
by Grimmwolf_GB
We have a sempron and the CPU load never went beyond 20%, so yes, it would be overkill to use it just for Allegiance.
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:04 am
by Bacon_00
Pinging tigereye.ca [204.14.17.162] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=50
Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=101ms TTL=50
Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=50
Reply from 204.14.17.162: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=50
Ping statistics for 204.14.17.162:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 98ms, Maximum = 101ms, Average = 98ms
Also, just as an FYI, it's 11 hops for me according to tracert.
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2007 6:14 pm
by Armisis
From Madison, Wisconsin:
I averaged 60ms ping with 20 pings and...
Code: Select all
Tracing route to tigereye.ca [204.14.17.162]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 25 ms 45 ms 16 ms 192.168.2.1
2 9 ms 97 ms 11 ms 172.18.97.105
3 20 ms 13 ms 42 ms 172.18.97.246
4 21 ms 24 ms 22 ms 12.118.104.73
5 24 ms 57 ms 50 ms tbr2-p011801.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.62]
6 19 ms 48 ms 23 ms ggr2-p3140.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.6.25]
7 24 ms 34 ms 21 ms if-6-3.core1.CT8-Chicago.teleglobe.net [66.110.27.29]
8 34 ms 54 ms 51 ms if-6-0.core1.TTT-Scarborough.teleglobe.net [216.6.60.17]
9 55 ms 46 ms 32 ms if-3-0.core2.TNK-Toronto.teleglobe.net [216.6.60.6]
10 32 ms 58 ms 46 ms if-13-0.core1.TNK-Toronto.teleglobe.net [216.6.112.17]
11 49 ms 47 ms 47 ms ix-1-151.core1.TNK-Toronto.teleglobe.net [216.6.112.22]
12 95 ms 44 ms 67 ms mail.initechcomputers.com [204.14.17.162]
Trace complete.
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2007 8:11 pm
by lightninglp
From Bucharest ROmania:
E:\DOCUME~1\LIGHTN~1.LIG>tracert tigereye.ca
Tracing route to tigereye.ca [204.14.17.162]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 11 ms 6 ms 9 ms 89.34.8.1
2 30 ms 22 ms 23 ms 194.153.247.69
3 26 ms 21 ms 22 ms br1.bucharest.vipnet.ro [193.230.219.225]
4 48 ms 40 ms 46 ms br1.frankfurt.vipnet.ro [193.230.219.146]
5 37 ms 40 ms 42 ms if-8-0.core1.FR1-Frankfurt.teleglobe.net [80.231.64.21]
6 43 ms 48 ms 46 ms if-2-0.core2.AD1-Amsterdam.teleglobe.net [80.231.81.13]
7 44 ms 42 ms 41 ms if-0-0.core1.AD1-Amsterdam.teleglobe.net [80.231.80.13]
8 57 ms 56 ms 60 ms if-6-0.mcore3.LHX-London.teleglobe.net [80.231.80.30]
9 127 ms 134 ms 129 ms 195.219.196.22
10 148 ms 149 ms 153 ms if-6-0.core2.TTT-Scarborough.Teleglobe.net [207.45.198.26]
11 150 ms 148 ms 147 ms if-5-0.core1.TNK-Toronto.Teleglobe.net [207.45.198.10]
12 153 ms 149 ms 146 ms ix-1-151.core1.TNK-Toronto.teleglobe.net [216.6.112.22]
13 156 ms 148 ms 151 ms mail.initechcomputers.com [204.14.17.162]
Trace complete.
E:\DOCUME~1\LIGHTN~1.LIG>
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 6:14 pm
by Tigereye
The new server arrived last night /smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />
It'll take me a few weeks to get it set up and driven over to the site, so don't expect anything to show up tonight.
For everyone who offered donations, I put a link in my
latest blog entry. No donations are necessary, but it will definitely help cover costs.
Thanks,
--TE
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 6:34 pm
by Anguirel
Can you also put up the modified "High-Bandwidth" server for testing purposes once you have the main server running well?
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 6:42 pm
by Tigereye
Anguirel wrote:QUOTE (Anguirel @ Feb 7 2007, 01:34 PM) Can you also put up the modified "High-Bandwidth" server for testing purposes once you have the main server running well?
If those modifications show that they offer an improvement over the current server, I definitely will.
I'll wait on the results from the tests though.
--TE