Squad Game Day 100+ players!

Icky · Post by **Icky** » Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:08 pm

Or read the forums for the past 6 months and see how many times Striker has tried to do something like this and had it fail miserably...

Alien51 · Post by **Alien51** » Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:24 pm

Shizoku wrote:QUOTE (Shizoku @ Mar 13 2011, 04:30 PM) Do yourself a favor and delete your forum account you useless spamming @#(! $#@!er.

This is spam? I'm on forums fairly often and I haven't seen such a post ever. But then I didn't start playing again until October of 2010.

Mastametz wrote:QUOTE (Mastametz @ Mar 13 2011, 04:36 PM) oh....my....god..... DIE IN A COUCH FIRE

**EDIT god damnit kummy, beat me to it.

but really. why is he allowed to post? everything he says is always the worst @#(! I've ever seen.

Why is this the worst idea?

NightRychune wrote:QUOTE (NightRychune @ Mar 13 2011, 04:37 PM) seriously 50v50 games sound cool and all but they are an absolute nightmare to command

and by nightmare to command i mean i won't even command them anymore because i refuse to deal with idiocy on that large of a scale

The idiocy is the same in smaller games. Actually I would imagine the idiocy to be less in larger games as there are more 2nd chances.

One-Man-Bucket wrote:QUOTE (One-Man-Bucket @ Mar 13 2011, 04:42 PM) Nightmare to play as well. I don'tknow how it is in the states, but over here in sweden the game chokes up horribly once more than 20 people fly around in the same sector.

Plus there are no cores that balances to games that big.

Is this true for many players?

MrChaos wrote:QUOTE (MrChaos @ Mar 13 2011, 05:05 PM) Stop being a troll or drinking from the fountain of bad ideas.... which ever fits

Neither fit.

Icky wrote:QUOTE (Icky @ Mar 13 2011, 05:08 PM) Or read the forums for the past 6 months and see how many times Striker has tried to do something like this and had it fail miserably...

6 months is a long time. I did a quick search on striker and I didn't see any topics he's made advocating this. Care to quote one?

guitarism · Post by **guitarism** » Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:30 pm

Alien51 wrote:QUOTE (Alien51 @ Mar 13 2011, 05:24 PM) The idiocy is the same in smaller games. Actually I would imagine the idiocy to be less in larger games as there are more 2nd chances.

This shows just how clueless you really are. Seriously.

Gandalf2 · Post by **Gandalf2** » Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:30 pm

Alien, don't respond to idiot trolls, they won't listen or suddenly come round to your point of view - save your breath/typing is my advice.

Alien51 · Post by **Alien51** » Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:31 pm

guitarism wrote:QUOTE (guitarism @ Mar 13 2011, 05:30 PM) This shows just how clueless you really are. Seriously.

In small game say 10v10. If 1 person messes up 10% of your team messes up.

In big game say 30v30. If 1 person messes up 3% of your team messes up.

guitarism · Post by **guitarism** » Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:35 pm

Except you'll never have just 1 person mess up in a 30 v 30. You'll have 5. And they always seem to do it together and at the same time.

The bigger the game, the less control you have over the team. And the more likely they are going to go off and be retards.

It's not a linear relationship. It's exponential. The more people you have on a team, the more chances you have of getting idiots.

Edit - Also - when MrC says your being stupid, your probably are.

lexaal · Post by **lexaal** » Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:40 pm

With the title Squad Game Day 100+ players i was expecting the opposite of the weekly allegiance-is-dead. I am dissapoint.

RedLion · Post by **RedLion** » Sun Mar 13, 2011 10:13 pm

You want feedback on your idea? I'll give you feedback:

NO!

Alien51 · Post by **Alien51** » Sun Mar 13, 2011 10:24 pm

RedLion wrote:QUOTE (RedLion @ Mar 13 2011, 06:13 PM) You want feedback on your idea? I'll give you feedback:

NO!

Why?

Elzam_ · Post by **Elzam_** » Sun Mar 13, 2011 10:46 pm

Alien! Drop it already! They already told you no and why!