Free Allegiance Forums

That's what I wanna know

Rigged

after the increase in size of the dreg @#(!, it ruined dreg...therefore i voted no because i don't want my bios fig ruined...(even though i don't use it much...)

Bios already has weak shields (0.9 modifier)... voted no for size increase.

Voted yes for bios basic figs dropping minepacks instead of prox - going sup means a lot of people will be able to get prox to the aleph in their figs fast, as DareDevil explained.

Yes to a (moderate) size increase.

No to removal of prox. Bios is stuck with the basic fighter longer than most, and it needs to be a tough beast. With prox and heavy cloak it's a decent tool for stopping those early bomb runs even vs. enh tech.

If you do pursue a size increase, please start small. Perhaps a 5% increase. A little bit will go a long ways.

On an entirely separate note: how goes the figbbr size increase idea?

A small size increase seems like a good solution.

Shizoku wrote:QUOTE (Shizoku @ Oct 2 2009, 05:11 AM) If you do pursue a size increase, please start small. Perhaps a 5% increase. A little bit will go a long ways.

On an entirely separate note: how goes the figbbr size increase idea?

I think the size increase is dependent on if they keep prox or you lot vote for them to get minepack instead.

also

Do you find figbees easier to stop now than before with their new size?

I really haven't noticed figbees being significantly less successful or easier to hit

Then again, I suck.

I don't know what changes have occured from DN to CC with Bios... but for me it wasn't the fact that bios gets extra tech at the begining with thier basic figs ( due to the fact of thier slow research times) but the fact that bios GS was crazzzzy over-powered early game.

Clay_Pigeon wrote:QUOTE (Clay_Pigeon @ Oct 2 2009, 10:54 AM) I really haven't noticed figbees being significantly less successful or easier to hit

Then again, I suck.

So perhaps Figbees are still too small?

or

You suck!?