Free Allegiance Forums

i'd use it if it had a higher top speed then booster, slower accel, lower fuel consumption, and didn't raise signature as much as boosters do.

Are you not taking into account TF scouts and patties?

yeah belter bombers and gs as well

Shizoku wrote:QUOTE (Shizoku @ Mar 9 2009, 10:04 AM) Are you not taking into account TF scouts and patties?

I start to wonder, maybe some people missed the part about using LtBoost on a ship that can use regular booster. That'd explain why poll results show so many people use it.

Compellor wrote:QUOTE (Compellor @ Mar 8 2009, 06:44 AM) LtBooster is definitely superior to a fuel tank if you need to boost 20k or more in an int

Actually, no. It is barely equal to additional fuel bottle at 20k and gets worse at smaller distances. That doesn't take sig into consideration, of course.
Read more here.

i've been toying with this idea: keep it as it is, but reduce signature increase to 0.

what do you think?

i use light booster especialy whle galving , useful to avoid enemy bullet(booster is better but when you finish fuel you are an easy target) and i dont think i will change nothing in it , maybe lower a little the signature.

Evincar wrote:QUOTE (Evincar @ Mar 9 2009, 02:04 PM) i've been toying with this idea: keep it as it is, but reduce signature increase to 0.

what do you think?

Zero would be evil, but lowering would help it be more useful.

What's the point of this poll?

To find out if lt.booster is only good for fig/bs / belter bombers, patties etc?

To make lt booster useful for figs and ints, I guess.

Although seeing how people "sometimes" use lt booster instead of normal one it may be not necessary. Why would you take lt booster above normal booster? I don't understand, it gives you nearly nothing.