Grand Scout Discussion

Development area for FreeAllegiance's Community Core.
SpkWill
Posts: 504
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 3:15 am
Location: Sheffield, UK

Post by SpkWill »

Why are there so many people who hate fun?
DasSmiter
Posts: 3820
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma

Post by DasSmiter »

Hvy scouts are really only effective against tac, and even then only because of cm2/3. I support changing the progression on adv to heavy and moving the adv to the garrison. There are a lot of inconsistencies in alleg, leave the ql alone! (though maybe make ql df a bit weaker than regular df?)
ImageImageImage
Get over yourselves, don't try to win arguments on the internet where the option of a punch in the mouth is unavailable
"It is not that I cannot create anything good, but that I will not." And to prove this, he created the peacock.
Adept
Posts: 8660
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Turku, Finland

Post by Adept »

Why does the heavy scout need them?

You guys are basically just saying "I like cheese". :huh:
ImageImageImageImageImage
<bp|> Maybe when I grow up I can be a troll like PsycH
<bp|> or an obsessive compulsive paladin of law like Adept
KofiMan
Posts: 414
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 8:00 am

Post by KofiMan »

If we lose QL, TF needs some new consideration as for their heavy scouts.
Broodwich
Posts: 5662
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 3:48 am
Location: Raincity

Post by Broodwich »

Adept wrote:QUOTE (Adept @ Dec 5 2008, 10:30 AM) Why does the heavy scout need them?

You guys are basically just saying "I like cheese". :huh:
hvy ints are cheese, quit your whining
QUOTE Drizzo: ha ha good old chap
Drizzo: i am a brit
Drizzo: tut tut
Drizzo: wankarrrrrr
Drizzo: i only have sex whilst in the missionary position[/quote] Fas est et ab hoste doceri - Ovid
Gandalf2
Posts: 3943
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:00 am
Location: W. Midlands, UK

Post by Gandalf2 »

This talk of QL missiles and turrets is all very well, and there are different views on these. However are we all agreed that moving adv scout to garrison is a good idea? Does anyone think otherwise?

If we start a poll and get at least 80% in favour will it actually get implemented?
Image
Image
spideycw - 'This is because Grav is a huge whining bitch. But we all knew that already' Dec 19 2010, 07:36 PM
CronoDroid
Posts: 4606
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 8:00 am
Contact:

Post by CronoDroid »

I'll edit the first post with a poll then.
CronoDroid
Posts: 4606
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 8:00 am
Contact:

Post by CronoDroid »

Well looks like not many people so far agree with moving Adv Scout to garrison!
Sushi
Posts: 405
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 7:00 am

Post by Sushi »

I'd like to see the QL/Duals as researchable tech. I don't have a problem with heavy scouts mounting them, but 1) they shouldn't get them for free, 2) they should be available to fighters (and maybe GS?) as well.
Kap
Posts: 1466
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 5:20 am
Location: Mexico

Post by Kap »

Sushi wrote:QUOTE (Sushi @ Dec 6 2008, 01:53 PM) I'd like to see the QL/Duals as researchable tech. I don't have a problem with heavy scouts mounting them, but 1) they shouldn't get them for free, 2) they should be available to fighters (and maybe GS?) as well.
ImageImage
If A is success in life, then A equals x plus y plus z. Work is x; y is play; and z is keeping your mouth shut. -- Albert Einstein
Post Reply