Page 2 of 6
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:06 am
by juckto
QUOTE should nan restore energy of the target ?[/quote]
No. If anything, it should drain the energy of the target to simulate the nanobots leeching the craft's energy as they conduct repairs.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:08 am
by KGJV
guitarism wrote:QUOTE (guitarism @ Sep 17 2008, 04:45 AM) Why are we worried about code changes like this when we're still without Ally teams? Get on the important things
coding is often boring once you know exactly what must be done.
And ATM, I feel pretty alone in the dev team. all others are MIA /rolleyes.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":roll:" border="0" alt="rolleyes.gif" />
so i'm just in a 'flood the forums' mood /smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:13 am
by Dark_Sponge
KGJV wrote:QUOTE (KGJV @ Sep 16 2008, 05:52 PM) This is much like the 'one side resonator' option I did for R4. it's there but no core use it. So, so far, it was wasted dev time /smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />
Hmm, how do you choose that option? ICE?
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:25 am
by KGJV
Dark_Sponge wrote:QUOTE (Dark_Sponge @ Sep 17 2008, 05:13 AM) Hmm, how do you choose that option? ICE?
yes
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:03 am
by Psychosis
I think that we seriously SERIOUSLY need to scrap ice, for the sake of CC and everyone
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:21 am
by madpeople
Psychosis wrote:QUOTE (Psychosis @ Sep 17 2008, 07:03 AM) I think that we seriously SERIOUSLY need to scrap ice, for the sake of CC and everyone
you want to use XVI32 instead?
i think kg is working on a new version of ICE, or at least adding extra features.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:26 pm
by Drizzo
Psychosis wrote:QUOTE (Psychosis @ Sep 17 2008, 02:03 AM) I think that we seriously SERIOUSLY need to scrap ice, for the sake of CC and everyone
if you feel that way, you do realize nobody is stopping you from making something better. or you could pay someone to do it for you.
if you can do neither, then I don't see why you feel the need to insult kage and his hard work... nevermind I forgot who I was speaking to
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 4:38 pm
by KGJV
Psychosis wrote:QUOTE (Psychosis @ Sep 17 2008, 08:03 AM) I think that we seriously SERIOUSLY need to scrap ice, for the sake of CC and everyone
I just SERIOUSLY don't understand what "scrap ice" means in this context ? /rolleyes.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":roll:" border="0" alt="rolleyes.gif" />
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:30 pm
by Bouwman
Another diasvantage is Rix SR's cross nanning each other with bbr=Bomb all opponent's bases off the map in one run /tongue.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":P" border="0" alt="tongue.gif" />
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:47 pm
by Psychosis
Because I would LOVE to play with all these new features, but ICE is not compatible with alot of it. Sadly right now I do not have the time to rewrite ICE.
on second though, I think that we should consider switching to an energy restoring gun, instead of using nan by itself