even for playing naked? ^_^Aeris wrote:QUOTE (Aeris @ Mar 23 2008, 08:05 AM) Stack is completely subjective. @Alleg can now ban for 0 reason what so ever! /wub.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":iluv:" border="0" alt="wub.gif" />
So admins ban stackers now?
-
CronoDroid
- Posts: 4606
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 8:00 am
- Contact:
I wouldn't call it stacking in this case anyhow. I mean are we basing stacking on settings or pilot skill here? Because Yellow had a strong team and really made us work for the win.
If we're basing stacking on settings, does that mean people will get banned for joining IC on Star? Or maybe Dreg or Rix on 1.25 starting?
If we're basing stacking on settings, does that mean people will get banned for joining IC on Star? Or maybe Dreg or Rix on 1.25 starting?
-
takingarms1
- Posts: 3052
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:00 am
So let's go over this again. BEER was banned for joining the team you were on, in a game that had no chance of being even under any circumstances, right after I joined that team. I wasn't banned, you weren't banned, the other 20 vets on blue weren't banned. The only person in the game that thought the ban was justified was Tiger. And you have no problem with this?
when the team $£%&$ up a bomb run, the comm doesn't boot the whole team (usually). they make an example of one or a fewLykourgos wrote:QUOTE (Lykourgos @ Mar 22 2008, 10:29 PM) So let's go over this again. BEER was banned for joining the team you were on, in a game that had no chance of being even under any circumstances, right after I joined that team. I wasn't banned, you weren't banned, the other 20 vets on blue weren't banned. The only person in the game that thought the ban was justified was Tiger. And you have no problem with this?
Obviously they are doing it wrong, you boot the entire team.madpeople wrote:QUOTE (madpeople @ Mar 22 2008, 03:34 PM) when the team $£%&$ up a bomb run, the comm doesn't boot the whole team (usually). they make an example of one or a few
slap wrote:QUOTE (slap @ Oct 7 2009, 01:28 AM) good point, I concede.



