So admins ban stackers now?

Allegiance discussion not belonging in another forum.
Ion
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 8:00 am
Location: England

Post by Ion »

Aeris wrote:QUOTE (Aeris @ Mar 23 2008, 08:05 AM) Stack is completely subjective. @Alleg can now ban for 0 reason what so ever! /wub.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":iluv:" border="0" alt="wub.gif" />
even for playing naked? ^_^
Image
Image
CronoDroid
Posts: 4606
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 8:00 am
Contact:

Post by CronoDroid »

I wouldn't call it stacking in this case anyhow. I mean are we basing stacking on settings or pilot skill here? Because Yellow had a strong team and really made us work for the win.

If we're basing stacking on settings, does that mean people will get banned for joining IC on Star? Or maybe Dreg or Rix on 1.25 starting?
takingarms1
Posts: 3052
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:00 am

Post by takingarms1 »

Ion wrote:QUOTE (Ion @ Mar 22 2008, 06:08 PM) even for playing naked? ^_^
Belters all played without pants during the zone game. That's why we won!
"You give my regards to St. Peter. Or, whoever has his job, but in hell!"
- - - -
Ion
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 8:00 am
Location: England

Post by Ion »

Well if this is the case i reckon over 3/4 of XT will be banned within the next 2 dayS!
Image
Image
Lykourgos
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Portland

Post by Lykourgos »

So let's go over this again. BEER was banned for joining the team you were on, in a game that had no chance of being even under any circumstances, right after I joined that team. I wasn't banned, you weren't banned, the other 20 vets on blue weren't banned. The only person in the game that thought the ban was justified was Tiger. And you have no problem with this?
pkk
Posts: 5419
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Germany, Munich

Post by pkk »

Allegiance needs more autocracy.
The Escapist (Justin Emerson) @ Dec 21 2010, 02:33 PM:
The history of open-source Allegiance is paved with the bodies of dead code branches, forum flame wars, and personal vendettas. But a community remains because people still love the game.
madpeople
Posts: 4787
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 8:00 am
Location: England

Post by madpeople »

Lykourgos wrote:QUOTE (Lykourgos @ Mar 22 2008, 10:29 PM) So let's go over this again. BEER was banned for joining the team you were on, in a game that had no chance of being even under any circumstances, right after I joined that team. I wasn't banned, you weren't banned, the other 20 vets on blue weren't banned. The only person in the game that thought the ban was justified was Tiger. And you have no problem with this?
when the team $£%&$ up a bomb run, the comm doesn't boot the whole team (usually). they make an example of one or a few
Ion
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 8:00 am
Location: England

Post by Ion »

Also what is the duration of these bans... seems like a hefty amount of hours for stacking
Image
Image
apochboi
Posts: 1744
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 7:00 am
Location: Dundee, Scotland

Post by apochboi »

The duration is however long they want. Deal!

Non standard bans is the way to go!
Last edited by apochboi on Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
IB_
Posts: 1651
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 3:11 am

Post by IB_ »

madpeople wrote:QUOTE (madpeople @ Mar 22 2008, 03:34 PM) when the team $£%&$ up a bomb run, the comm doesn't boot the whole team (usually). they make an example of one or a few
Obviously they are doing it wrong, you boot the entire team.
slap wrote:QUOTE (slap @ Oct 7 2009, 01:28 AM) good point, I concede.
Post Reply