Ram damage

Tactical advice, How-to, Post-mortem, etc.
takingarms1
Posts: 3052
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2004 8:00 am

Post by takingarms1 »

How about I just ram my foot up your ass, n00bs!!!
"You give my regards to St. Peter. Or, whoever has his job, but in hell!"
- - - -
factoid
Posts: 929
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Winnipeg, Canada

Post by factoid »

Mass effects damage indirectly. Damage is only based on change in velocity and HP because that change in part factors in mass.

If you hit an object with effectively infinite mass, then your change in velocity will be much greater than the other object's change in velocity. The HP of the objects involved in the collision is where you get your "Jello vs. Steel" aspect of the collision. Higher HP objects will deal more damage to the other ship, proportional to the change in velocity.

So to continue the above example, if your "infinite mass" object also happened to have 0 HP, then the amount of damage dealt to both parties would be 0. (The infinite mass object takes no damage because it didn't have it's velocity affected, the regularly massed object takes no damage because the other object had no HPs).

Clear?
"I make it a point not to chat with AP off... space is vast, but it's never vast enough for my scout."
ogorass
Posts: 2273
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Contact:

Post by ogorass »

I *think* what factoid was trying to say is something along the lines of: 'yah' or 'basically yah'. Not sure though... /blink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":o" border="0" alt="blink.gif" />
Image
Image
barizanz
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 3:26 pm

Post by barizanz »

factoid wrote:QUOTE (factoid @ Mar 20 2008, 03:13 PM) Mass effects damage indirectly. Damage is only based on change in velocity and HP because that change in part factors in mass.

If you hit an object with effectively infinite mass, then your change in velocity will be much greater than the other object's change in velocity. The HP of the objects involved in the collision is where you get your "Jello vs. Steel" aspect of the collision. Higher HP objects will deal more damage to the other ship, proportional to the change in velocity.

So to continue the above example, if your "infinite mass" object also happened to have 0 HP, then the amount of damage dealt to both parties would be 0. (The infinite mass object takes no damage because it didn't have it's velocity affected, the regularly massed object takes no damage because the other object had no HPs).

Clear?
With the changes in con planting, if a large con is rammed, does it take damage?
ImageImage
Icky
Posts: 1436
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:00 am

Post by Icky »

I think it stands to reason that a large con would take damage if it was rammed by a sufficiently massive ship.

Something else that Factoid's post makes me think of: is the HP used in the calculation current HP or possible HP? If current, that would mean that a large con with almost no HP left would cause nearly no damage to the ship that is ramming it.
Terran wrote:QUOTE (Terran @ Jan 20 2011, 03:56 PM) i'm like adept
Broodwich wrote:QUOTE (Broodwich @ Jun 6 2010, 10:19 PM) if you spent as much time in game as trollin sf might not be dead
Gandalf2
Posts: 3943
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:00 am
Location: W. Midlands, UK

Post by Gandalf2 »

I ram-killed a stealth fighter the other day. That was fun.
Image
Image
spideycw - 'This is because Grav is a huge whining bitch. But we all knew that already' Dec 19 2010, 07:36 PM
WhiskeyGhost
Posts: 1014
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:15 pm
Location: Gulf Coast, guess which one?

Post by WhiskeyGhost »

Icky wrote:QUOTE (Icky @ Mar 20 2008, 05:03 PM) I think it stands to reason that a large con would take damage if it was rammed by a sufficiently massive ship.

Something else that Factoid's post makes me think of: is the HP used in the calculation current HP or possible HP? If current, that would mean that a large con with almost no HP left would cause nearly no damage to the ship that is ramming it.
One would think that it would be based on current hp instead of total (or possible) hp, since it would effectively make your ship useless with low hp rams (but instead, they do considerable damage, just watch an int with a sliver of hull ram a bomber, still puts a dent in it just as much as one with full hull).
Image
Rand0m_Numb3r wrote:QUOTE (Rand0m_Numb3r @ Aug 9 2007, 12:27 AM)CURSES I HAVE BEEN DEFEATED!
HSharp
Posts: 5192
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 11:18 am
Location: Brum, UK

Post by HSharp »

Are shields involved??? If you rammed a Large Con with a Pheonix Battlecruiser with full shields but a slither of hull would said Large Con be affected HP wise??

is HP calcualted Hull+Shields or just Hull??

Why are GT AP HTT's bitches to ram???
Image
Image
madpeople
Posts: 4787
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 8:00 am
Location: England

Post by madpeople »

std HTT mass: 45
armour plate HTT mass: 180
HSharp
Posts: 5192
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 11:18 am
Location: Brum, UK

Post by HSharp »

madpeople wrote:QUOTE (madpeople @ Mar 20 2008, 11:28 PM) std HTT mass: 45
armour plate HTT mass: 180
so next time using an int to ram off course a GT AP HTT should load up on a few large shields first,

also this leads me to another question. If you loaded up a scout/int/fig with lots of large shields and/or aleph resonators (or a mass driver) and then proceeded to gently nudge at low speeds large cons would said large cons get knocked off-course while ramming ship sustains minimal damage?

or basically whats the mass of your average large con?
Image
Image
Post Reply