IC corvs not available?

Discussion / Announcement area for Dark Nebulae Core development.
Grim_Reaper_4u
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Netherlands

Post by Grim_Reaper_4u »

wizard58 wrote:QUOTE (wizard58 @ Dec 3 2006, 08:32 PM) Actually if u take in consideration mining speed and yeald capacity nix is the fastest faction to sy rush , u get lt class , med class .
And if u take the shields boost in consideration they are quite powerful
Yeah, just another reason to delete that broken faction from alleg /wink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink.gif" /> Personally I think it's so broken that we should just give any commander who plays Nix an automatic -50 ELO /cool.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":cool:" border="0" alt="cool.gif" />
Noir
Posts: 153
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Dark Nebulae
Contact:

Post by Noir »

And yet, they are defeated easily.
Image
Allegiance - Dark Nebulae - Web Site
"NANITE MOTHER $#@!ER... DO YOU MOUNT IT?"
Grim_Reaper_4u
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Netherlands

Post by Grim_Reaper_4u »

In a pickup game with 75% newbs and voobs you can't stop nix from getting vanguards up, and as soon as Nix get vans (with lasers) you might as well resign because there is no way in hell a pu team will beat nix after that. Nice thing is that you can't even bomb nix because it takes a @#(!load of missiles to kill their bases (last time I think i needed like 16 ab1 to kill their starbase). their hitboxes suck too /wink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink.gif" />
Dengaroth
Posts: 3329
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 7:00 am
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Contact:

Post by Dengaroth »

Grim, you are mistaken. The win percentages clearly show there is nothing wrong with Nix at all.
Image
Image
RT: The number of typical responses decreases exponentially as the number of joke options increases.
Image
Grim_Reaper_4u
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Netherlands

Post by Grim_Reaper_4u »

Deng win % don't mean anything and you know it, stupid comms skew the results and stacks skew the results. /smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />
guitarism
Posts: 2240
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:00 am
Location: Richmond

Post by guitarism »

So upgrade your commander's and team's intelligence...
FIZ wrote:QUOTE (FIZ @ Feb 28 2011, 04:56 PM) After Slap I use Voltaire for light reading.
CronoDroid wrote:QUOTE (CronoDroid @ Jan 23 2009, 07:46 PM) If you're going to go GT, go Exp, unless you're Gooey. But Gooey is nuts.
QUOTE [20:13] <DasSmiter> I like to think that one day he logged on and accidentally clicked his way to the EoR forum
[20:13] <DasSmiter> And his heart exploded in a cloud of fury[/quote]
Gappy
Posts: 461
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 7:35 pm

Post by Gappy »

I seem to recall a game recently where it was giga tac v. nix, with tac just owning the vans, and EMP mines + hunters stopping any bomb runs that they attempted
We've upped our standards. Up yours.
madpeople
Posts: 4787
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 8:00 am
Location: England

Post by madpeople »

need "team intelegance" GA in gar, also include "clue" in gar for $5
Rand0m_Numb3r
Posts: 1338
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Madison, Wisconsin

Post by Rand0m_Numb3r »

yea go tac vs nix and hope they dont rush

i feel that nix is weaker its just that people underestmate dis1

if nix ever needs a buff id say make their med hull nanable but only 0.4 or 0.3 nan dmg mod
Beyond the clock tower.
Psychosis
Posts: 4218
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 7:00 am
Location: California

Post by Psychosis »

with a techbase or the med upgrade, IC gets corv's at $2,400 a pop

so yeah, but the 10k exp for the ints, then spend the 15k on the SY and you have corvs... i fail to see how this is a nerf at all?

i would rather have a techbase give me the LT upgrade for SY, then just put the money into the SY

this is a HUGE advantage in the SY, especially with ships costing cheeper, and IC ints rocking so much.
Post Reply