Server check

Allegiance discussion not belonging in another forum.
Post Reply
Flower
Posts: 252
Joined: Mon Jun 26, 2006 7:00 am
Location: K-Pax

Post by Flower »

Edit: Oh yeah the location :-)
near Frankfurt, Germany (I must be somewhere in the vicinity of the server)

Code: Select all

$ ping www.keyweb.de -n 20

Pinging www.keyweb.de [62.141.52.5] with 32 bytes o

Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=115ms TTL=56
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=56
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=56
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=56
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=56
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=56
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=56
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=56
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=56
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=56
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=56
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=56
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=89ms TTL=56
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=56
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=56
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=56
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=56
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=56
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=56
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=56

Ping statistics for 62.141.52.5:
    Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 20, Lost = 0 (0%
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 115ms, Average = 38ms
Last edited by Flower on Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
@RT: "We've never been whores, we are misunderstood RTists."
Top
Tigereye
Posts: 4952
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Post by Tigereye »

Code: Select all

TigerBook:~ Tigereye$ ping www.keyweb.de
PING www.keyweb.de (62.141.52.5): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=114.486 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=114.132 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=115.505 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=114.069 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=114.097 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=5 ttl=48 time=113.183 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=6 ttl=48 time=115.673 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=7 ttl=48 time=113.249 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=8 ttl=48 time=114.386 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=9 ttl=48 time=114.897 ms
^C
--- www.keyweb.de ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 113.183/114.368/115.673/0.785 ms
From Oakville, Ontario Canada, behind a pretty crappy hub that is likely adding many ms to my pings.

--TE
Last edited by Tigereye on Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.


The Allegiance community currently hates their sysadmin because he is doing: [Too Much] [____________|] [Too Little]
Current reason: Removing the PayPal contribute page. Send Bitcoin instead: 1EccFi98tR5S9BYLuB61sFfxKqqgSKK8Yz. This scale updates regularly.
Top
BlackViper
Posts: 6993
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Green Bay, WI

Post by BlackViper »

factoid wrote:QUOTE (factoid @ Oct 27 2006, 09:56 AM) Nicely played BV
/mrgreen.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="mrgreen.gif" /> /laugh.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":lol:" border="0" alt="laugh.gif" /> /mrgreen.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="mrgreen.gif" />
Always in the Shadows...
Top
madpeople
Posts: 4787
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 8:00 am
Location: England

Post by madpeople »

hmm showing off with aditional options are we?

Code: Select all

ping www.keyweb.de -n 10 -l 1000 -r 9

Pinging www.keyweb.de [62.141.52.5] with 1000 bytes of data:

Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=1000 time=108ms TTL=50
    Route: 130.88.250.53 ->
           194.66.21.241 ->
           194.66.25.98 ->
           146.97.40.202 ->
           146.97.35.166 ->
           146.97.33.54 ->
           146.97.33.38 ->
           146.97.35.249 ->
           195.66.226.15
Request timed out.
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=1000 time=48ms TTL=50
    Route: 130.88.250.53 ->
           194.66.21.241 ->
           194.66.25.98 ->
           146.97.40.202 ->
           146.97.35.166 ->
           146.97.33.54 ->
           146.97.33.38 ->
           146.97.35.249 ->
           195.66.226.15
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=1000 time=122ms TTL=50
    Route: 130.88.250.53 ->
           194.66.21.241 ->
           194.66.25.98 ->
           146.97.40.202 ->
           146.97.35.166 ->
           146.97.33.54 ->
           146.97.33.38 ->
           146.97.35.249 ->
           195.66.226.15
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=1000 time=41ms TTL=50
    Route: 130.88.250.53 ->
           194.66.21.241 ->
           194.66.25.98 ->
           146.97.40.202 ->
           146.97.35.166 ->
           146.97.33.54 ->
           146.97.33.38 ->
           146.97.35.249 ->
           195.66.226.15
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=1000 time=193ms TTL=50
    Route: 130.88.250.53 ->
           194.66.21.241 ->
           194.66.25.98 ->
           146.97.40.202 ->
           146.97.35.166 ->
           146.97.33.54 ->
           146.97.33.38 ->
           146.97.35.249 ->
           195.66.226.15
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=1000 time=40ms TTL=50
    Route: 130.88.250.53 ->
           194.66.21.241 ->
           194.66.25.98 ->
           146.97.40.202 ->
           146.97.35.166 ->
           146.97.33.54 ->
           146.97.33.38 ->
           146.97.35.249 ->
           195.66.226.15
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=1000 time=41ms TTL=50
    Route: 130.88.250.53 ->
           194.66.21.241 ->
           194.66.25.98 ->
           146.97.40.202 ->
           146.97.35.166 ->
           146.97.33.54 ->
           146.97.33.38 ->
           146.97.35.249 ->
           195.66.226.15
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=1000 time=43ms TTL=50
    Route: 130.88.250.53 ->
           194.66.21.241 ->
           194.66.25.98 ->
           146.97.40.202 ->
           146.97.35.166 ->
           146.97.33.54 ->
           146.97.33.38 ->
           146.97.35.249 ->
           195.66.226.15
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=1000 time=43ms TTL=50
    Route: 130.88.250.53 ->
           194.66.21.241 ->
           194.66.25.98 ->
           146.97.40.202 ->
           146.97.35.166 ->
           146.97.33.54 ->
           146.97.33.38 ->
           146.97.35.249 ->
           195.66.226.15

Ping statistics for 62.141.52.5:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 9, Lost = 1 (10% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 40ms, Maximum = 193ms, Average = 75ms
Top
pkk
Posts: 5419
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Germany, Munich

Post by pkk »

BlackViper wrote:QUOTE (BlackViper @ Oct 27 2006, 02:39 PM) Location> Gey Bay, Wanconsin
/blink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":o" border="0" alt="blink.gif" />
Last edited by pkk on Fri Oct 27, 2006 3:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Escapist (Justin Emerson) @ Dec 21 2010, 02:33 PM:
The history of open-source Allegiance is paved with the bodies of dead code branches, forum flame wars, and personal vendettas. But a community remains because people still love the game.
Top
BlackViper
Posts: 6993
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Green Bay, WI

Post by BlackViper »

'Touche /cool.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":cool:" border="0" alt="cool.gif" />
Always in the Shadows...
Top
ImmortalZ
Posts: 5048
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 7:00 am
Location: India
Contact:
Contact ImmortalZ

Post by ImmortalZ »

QUOTE Pinging www.keyweb.de [62.141.52.5]with 32 bytes of data:


Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=420ms TTL=250
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=416ms TTL=250
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=416ms TTL=250
Reply from 62.141.52.5: bytes=32 time=416ms TTL=250


Ping statistics for 62.141.52.5:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 416ms, Maximum = 420ms, Average = 417ms[/quote]

Location - Trivandrum, India.

For reference, my average ping to aarm's servers is ~350ms.
Top
peet
Posts: 4972
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 6:57 pm
Location: Holland

Post by peet »

Now we still can't kill you, you lagwarrior /tongue.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":P" border="0" alt="tongue.gif" />
ImmortalZ wrote:QUOTE (ImmortalZ @ Oct 27 2006, 05:43 PM) Location - Trivandrum, India.

For reference, my average ping to aarm's servers is ~350ms.
Image
Top
Aoreias
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 8:00 am
Location: Monterey, CA

Post by Aoreias »

Code: Select all

Tardis:~ Aoreias$ ping www.keyweb.de
PING www.keyweb.de (62.141.52.5): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=0 ttl=45 time=187.692 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=1 ttl=45 time=190.169 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=2 ttl=45 time=188.617 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=3 ttl=45 time=186.894 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=4 ttl=45 time=190.750 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=5 ttl=45 time=190.295 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=6 ttl=45 time=190.630 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=7 ttl=45 time=186.785 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=8 ttl=45 time=189.970 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=9 ttl=45 time=190.206 ms
64 bytes from 62.141.52.5: icmp_seq=10 ttl=45 time=188.679 ms
^C
--- www.keyweb.de ping statistics ---
11 packets transmitted, 11 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 186.785/189.153/190.750/1.421 ms

Tardis:~ Aoreias$ traceroute www.keyweb.de
traceroute to www.keyweb.de (62.141.52.5), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets
 1  * * *
 2  ge-1-8-sr01.monterey.ca.sfba.comcast.net (68.87.196.161)  11.165 ms  11.908 ms *
 3  68.87.226.166 (68.87.226.166)  10.258 ms  10.648 ms *
 4  68.87.226.82 (68.87.226.82)  12.631 ms  12.923 ms *
 5  * 10g-9-1-ar01.sfsutro.ca.sfba.comcast.net (68.87.192.37)  13.565 ms *
 6  * * 10g-9-1-ar01.oakland.ca.sfba.comcast.net (68.87.226.6)  14.004 ms
 7  68.87.226.134 (68.87.226.134)  16.233 ms  16.947 ms  15.395 ms
 8  68.86.90.81 (68.86.90.81)  18.457 ms  17.298 ms  16.674 ms
 9  te-0-0-0-0-cr01.sanjose.ca.ibone.comcast.net (68.86.84.42)  20.710 ms  20.982 ms  21.524 ms
10  * * *
11  lambdanet-communications.ge-5-3-0.ar2.fra3.gblx.net (64.209.92.58)  179.759 ms  179.848 ms  179.778 ms
12  fra-2-pos510.de.lambdanet.net (217.71.96.49)  182.303 ms  183.296 ms  179.970 ms
13  fra-8-pos300.de.lambdanet.net (217.71.105.94)  179.393 ms  179.614 ms  202.850 ms
14  keyweb-ef2.de.lambdanet.net (217.71.107.130)  190.549 ms  191.166 ms  190.829 ms
15  ns.km12508.keymachine.de (62.141.52.5)  187.574 ms  186.735 ms  187.150 ms
Looks like that link from europe to the west coast is giving me a bit of lag.
No, pants are still optional. But for you, recommended.

--Aoreias (Gap_Dragon/Gappy)
Top
MoGas
Posts: 174
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Hamburg

Post by MoGas »

Ping www.keyweb.de [62.141.52.5] mit 32 Bytes Daten:

Antwort von 62.141.52.5: Bytes=32 Zeit=27ms TTL=55
Antwort von 62.141.52.5: Bytes=32 Zeit=28ms TTL=55
Antwort von 62.141.52.5: Bytes=32 Zeit=26ms TTL=55
Antwort von 62.141.52.5: Bytes=32 Zeit=25ms TTL=55

Ping-Statistik für 62.141.52.5:
Pakete: Gesendet = 4, Empfangen = 4, Verloren = 0 (0% Verlust),
Ca. Zeitangaben in Millisek.:
Minimum = 25ms, Maximum = 28ms, Mittelwert = 26ms
signature deleted
Top
Post Reply

Return to “General”