AllegSkill

Terran · Post by **Terran** » Fri Mar 23, 2018 7:57 pm

Dome wrote:QUOTE (Dome @ Mar 22 2018, 06:06 PM) ehhhhhhhhh seems like it would promote personal attacks. I'd like to be rated by my accomplishments, not by my popularity.

gives us @allegs something to do. haven't had to ban anyone in too long

cashto · Post by **cashto** » Fri Mar 23, 2018 11:47 pm

Dome wrote:QUOTE (Dome @ Mar 22 2018, 03:06 PM) ehhhhhhhhh seems like it would promote personal attacks. I'd like to be rated by my accomplishments, not by my popularity.

Dome, you will always have a 10/10 rating for your accomplishment in permabanning Metz.

qqmwoarplox · Post by **qqmwoarplox** » Fri Mar 23, 2018 11:51 pm

Not really a permaban if he's playing right now is it

Mastametz · Post by **Mastametz** » Sat Mar 24, 2018 12:08 am

TheAlaskan · Post by **TheAlaskan** » Sat Mar 24, 2018 12:57 am

I'm pretty sure there is only one person arguing here while everyone bends down to talk to them.

Mastametz · Post by **Mastametz** » Sat Mar 24, 2018 1:32 am

Wasp seems to have a desperate need to argue that something is terrible if its imperfect or otherwise flawed in any conceivable way.

But it doesn't matter

Allegskill was the most accurate system we've had and are likely to ever have, just put it back.

and then we can reset ranks.

Mastametz · Post by **Mastametz** » Sat Mar 24, 2018 2:07 am

or if that's too difficult to put into Steam for some reason just put an Elo system in like

every. single. other. game. ever. on steam.

raumvogel · Post by **raumvogel** » Sun Mar 25, 2018 7:34 am

phoenix1 wrote:QUOTE (phoenix1 @ Mar 22 2018, 05:26 PM) And in the AllegSkill era you were about an 8.

10 actually.

Archangelus · Post by **Archangelus** » Sun Mar 25, 2018 4:00 pm

Terran wrote:QUOTE (Terran @ Mar 22 2018, 06:46 PM) if implementing AllegSkill requires too much work and skill, can we instead do something like a popularity match? right click a palyer's name, assign a rating between 0 and 20. average rating is displayed as the player's rank. would be way more accurate than what we have now and would add some potential drama, and we all know that drama keeps this game alive.

Can I rate (hate) ppl too?

Also I dunno why are you all arguing about a ranking system, considering most games are played during weekends by the same 60 persons range.

You guys need to get laid more often.

jk28437 · Post by **jk28437** » Mon Mar 26, 2018 7:33 am

I can't help but chuckle at this rediculous debate. Once again, the self important whores have their panties all twisted up because Tenforward has a higher rank than they do. While they all know that the current ranks are point based, and over the past five years, ten has more play time than any three whores combined, the optics makes it LOOK like he is the better player.

Thank you, pkk and k10, for adding some modicum of reason to this thread.

In the end, there is no reason for your true skill ranks and its a waste of the devs time to look at it. You all had your shot at resurrecting this game, but with the exception of a hand full of saints, you gladly abused the hundred plus noobs that walked in to stroke your sad epeens and never tried to recruit or train any of them. How can you expect to retain people like this? How many names on the squad rosters weren't around during the AGS days?

The most vocal of the vets, while perhaps a cornerstone of the community, are also toxic to noobs and voobs alike. They remind me of a bunch of old men glorifying nostalgia and how they miss the good ole days while in their next breathe, cursing the younger generation for any changes from their comfortable norms. The devs here are truly dedicated men for putting up with some of you overgrown babies.