Climate Scientists Laugh at Global Warming Hysteria.

Post by **MagisterXF94** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 12:57 pm

QUOTE It's probably not enough but it's a start that can be built on. What have you done Globey, personally, locally and nationally? And how much of that will be undone by your current President?[/quote]
I wanna see a reply to that!

Globemaster_III · Post by **Globemaster_III** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 3:49 pm

Raveen quote : For me, I work in flood risk management so I ensure that new houses are built with climate change in mind (specifically higher rainfall) and we're now pushing to get greater biodiversity as part of our drainage systems which will have clear environmental benefits.

are you insane ? in texas we used the biodiversity and it back fire on us, why don't you ask your gov body to send someone to Texas and learn from our mistake.

Here are the old news from Hilary Clinton : http://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/c...uranium-assets/
and http://www.cnbc.com/2015/04/23/cash-flowed...um-company.html

and http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/31/hillarys...ton-foundation/

and https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... hange-deal
this don't mean much, just an agreement, so what raveen ?

It's probably not enough but it's a start that can be built on. What have you done Globey, personally, locally and nationally? And how much of that will be undone by your current President?

I wanna see a reply to that!

Get ready noirsol,

I reduce personal flying by 40% maybe 50% if more i would be lying
business meeting, i book the airline
I sell my lake house and moving back to my old house

i stop having more kids cause

i eat less steak and more fish and vegie

good for my health too
i raise my own chicken, cow and garden
i drive camry hybrid and i park my diesel trucks,corvette, boat and motorcycle away
i turn on 1 LED light instead of more

i put away my diesel generator and install my solar panels
i clean up my guns and put it away
i support clean water acts ( clean water for everybody )
i Support local to feed the hunger
i do a lots more but i am not going to brag about it

i have personally reduce my CO2 inputs and it should started with me

Blacksum, do you like that ?

Globemaster_III · Post by **Globemaster_III** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:07 pm

Former President Obama said: We have a saying in America that you need to put your money where your mouth is,” Obama told an audience at Hangzhou’s West Lake state guesthouse. “And when it comes to combating climate change that is what we are doing … we are leading by example.”

Nick Mabey of the UK-based environmental thinktank, E3G, said: “US and Chinese ratification sends a strong signal to investors and businesses that they can continue investing on the assumption that the Paris climate deal will be delivered.”

Bob Ward of the London School of Economics said the move would encourage other countries to move quickly and added: “Importantly, it should also make it more difficult for Donald Trump to renege on the Paris agreement if he becomes president of the US.”

well, the world scare of one person name Donald j Trump as the president of the Unites Stated

FYI, i copy and pasted cause i am too lazy

Post by **Raveen** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:48 pm

So Obama's USA, the UK and China all agree to ratify something you agree with and Trump is going to reject it and you're still pleased with your vote?

Post by **Raveen** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:55 pm

Globemaster_III wrote:QUOTE (Globemaster_III @ Mar 15 2017, 03:49 PM) Raveen quote : For me, I work in flood risk management so I ensure that new houses are built with climate change in mind (specifically higher rainfall) and we're now pushing to get greater biodiversity as part of our drainage systems which will have clear environmental benefits.

are you insane ? in texas we used the biodiversity and it back fire on us, why don't you ask your gov body to send someone to Texas and learn from our mistake.

I'm lost on this one, anyone have a clue?

Globemaster_III wrote:QUOTE (Globemaster_III @ Mar 15 2017, 03:49 PM) Here are the old news from Hilary Clinton : http://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/c...uranium-assets/
and http://www.cnbc.com/2015/04/23/cash-flowed...um-company.html

And...? Uranium has exactly what to do with Climate Change? Except being potentially an alternative to oil and coal.

Globemaster_III wrote:QUOTE (Globemaster_III @ Mar 15 2017, 03:49 PM) and http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/31/hillarys...ton-foundation/

Um, ok?

Globemaster_III wrote:QUOTE (Globemaster_III @ Mar 15 2017, 03:49 PM) and https://www.theguardian.com/environment ... hange-deal
this don't mean much, just an agreement, so what raveen ?

Ok, so the leading nations of the world enact laws to reduce emmisions that cause Climate Change and you think that doesn't mean much? Why doesn't it mean much? Why do you think the USA will break it's own laws?

Globemaster_III wrote:QUOTE (Globemaster_III @ Mar 15 2017, 03:49 PM) I reduce personal flying by 40% maybe 50% if more i would be lying
business meeting, i book the airline
I sell my lake house and moving back to my old house
i stop having more kids cause
i eat less steak and more fish and vegie good for my health too
i raise my own chicken, cow and garden
i drive camry hybrid and i park my diesel trucks,corvette, boat and motorcycle away
i turn on 1 LED light instead of more
i put away my diesel generator and install my solar panels
i clean up my guns and put it away
i support clean water acts ( clean water for everybody )
i Support local to feed the hunger
i do a lots more but i am not going to brag about it

i have personally reduce my CO2 inputs and it should started with me

Blacksum, do you like that ?

Looks like you do a lot and that's great. Of course you should be doing more, because we all should be doing more, it's the nature of the game. Flying at all for pleasure is probably bad. Flying for travel is worse than the train (IIRC). But like I say, there's more that everyone in the western world can and probably should do.

Globemaster_III · Post by **Globemaster_III** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 6:23 pm

Ok, so the leading nations of the world enact laws to reduce emmisions that cause Climate Change and you think that doesn't mean much? Why doesn't it mean much? Why do you think the USA will break it's own laws?

If one former president say Yes and the next President say No..........Guess raven

And...? Uranium has exactly what to do with Climate Change? Except being potentially an alternative to oil and coal.

Uranium expose to the ground water, kill tree and plants, human , like I say every things effect climate change

biodiversity as part of our drainage systems which will have clear environmental benefits

your biodiversity could back fire and let nature do it course and why build a house that are prone to flooded area ?
I be going fishing today and thinking more about your questions, I used to fly and do all my thinking

I cut back flying

Post by **Raveen** » Wed Mar 15, 2017 9:06 pm

Uranium in groundwater would be bad but it won't have any effect on the global scale. Locally, bad, globally, not much difference.

Scrapping the Paris agreement, which you voted for remember, potentially catastrophic, particularly if other countries follow the lead of the USA.

We don't allow houses in areas probe to flooding, but if you create impermeable surfaces you'll have more water running off so you need to direct it and store it. I'm not sure what your problem with biodiversity is still, it's just providing somewhere for plants and animals that like water to live. And in the UK that's nothing more fearsome than a great crested newt. If there was a risk of alligators in my attenuation ponds I'd think twice about disallowing sealed underground tanks

Enjoy your fishing!

ryujin · Post by **ryujin** » Thu Mar 16, 2017 1:34 am

Globemaster_III wrote:QUOTE (Globemaster_III @ Mar 15 2017, 11:49 AM) i support clean water acts ( clean water for everybody )

I'm calling bull @#(!.
You support Trump.
He is against the clean water act.
You are against the clean water act by supporting him.

Q.E. $#@!ing D.

not that I really believe 1/4 of what you say anyway

Post by **zombywoof** » Thu Mar 16, 2017 4:42 am

Globemaster_III wrote:QUOTE (Globemaster_III @ Mar 15 2017, 11:23 AM) And...? Uranium has exactly what to do with Climate Change? Except being potentially an alternative to oil and coal.

Uranium expose to the ground water, kill tree and plants, human , like I say every things effect climate change

First, I want to respond to Raveen:

Uranium is not a potential alternative to oil and coal, it is the only viable alternative if we are opposed to reverting to a pre-industrial society... which if you want to do that, fine, but that'll be a tough sell to parents of kids. (As opposed to parents of teenagers, who would probably not mind so much if their child dropped dead of measles.)

Uranium, well nuclear in general, is a $#@!ing silver bullet and would continue to be if the Soviets hadn't tried to build their own version of American lwrs and instead focused on stealing our tech like they'd done for everything else people would continue to realize that nuclear power is a silver $#@!ing bullet. It's highly energy dense, you can run it at almost its maximum capacity pretty much of the time, you can (with the exception of RBMK reactors which are @#(!ty versions of gen2 reactors) step them up or down to meet demand fairly readily, and they're safe... safe enough that hitting one with a tidal wave is probably the best $#@!ing thing you could do for the environment.

Seriously has anyone noticed that the result of massive nuclear accidents is a sudden resurgence in wildlife? That's ironic as @#(!. The best thing we could do for the environment is start a nuclear war. Check out the crap that's happening at the Fukushima exclusion zone: "oh $#@! wildlife has overrun the city nearby..."

That's why I want to be a nuclear engineer: I want to save this damn species I was born into, pile of misguided self-sabotaging $#@!s they may be. Plus cheap electricity is great for poor people, great for the economy, and pretty much one of those rising tides that tends to lift all ships. Oh, per kilowatthour (aldkjsf;alskjdf;alksjdf;alskjdf who $#@!ing measures energy like that) it turns out nuclear is by far the cheapest.

So now to respond to Globey:

You are wrong.

Post by **zombywoof** » Thu Mar 16, 2017 4:43 am

Ryujin wrote:QUOTE (Ryujin @ Mar 15 2017, 06:34 PM) I'm calling bull @#(!.
You support Trump.
He is against the clean water act.
You are against the clean water act by supporting him.

Q.E. $#@!ing D.

Don't make me throw a formal logic book at you