Proposted CC12 Changes

Development area for FreeAllegiance's Community Core.
Icky
Posts: 1436
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2006 8:00 am

Post by Icky »

Did anyone else notice the Freudian slip in the topic of this thread?

"Proposed" became "Proposted" which is awfully close to...


PREPOSTEROUS
Terran wrote:QUOTE (Terran @ Jan 20 2011, 03:56 PM) i'm like adept
Broodwich wrote:QUOTE (Broodwich @ Jun 6 2010, 10:19 PM) if you spent as much time in game as trollin sf might not be dead
Pos_21
Posts: 1110
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Pacifica, California

Post by Pos_21 »

I would like IC TPs galvable.

"Don't screw around with the $#@!head. Trust the $#@!head."
spideycw
Posts: 7512
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 7:00 am

Post by spideycw »

Spunkmeyer wrote:QUOTE (Spunkmeyer @ Mar 2 2011, 09:50 AM) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demagogy

5th? Please. There is no statistical difference between those options after reduce paydays (which didn't work so great did it) and increase BIOS fig scale.

But if we are playing poll wars:
http://www.freeallegiance.org/forums/index...showtopic=61779

If still not satisfied:
http://www.freeallegiance.org/forums/index...showtopic=61939
None of anything you posted addressed why you decided bios figs losing prox was needed vs any other solutions.
I'm sorry I don't remember any of it. For you the day spideycw graced your squad with utter destruction was the most important day of your life. But for me, it was Sunday
Idanmel wrote:QUOTE (Idanmel @ Mar 19 2012, 05:54 AM) I am ashamed for all the drama I caused, I have much to learn on how to behave when things don't go my way.

My apologies.
Spunkmeyer
Posts: 2013
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Contact me regarding: CC, Slayer and AllegWiki.

Post by Spunkmeyer »

spideycw wrote:QUOTE (spideycw @ Mar 2 2011, 07:52 PM) None of anything you posted addressed why you decided bios figs losing prox was needed vs any other solutions.
Correct, because you didn't ask that question, which in turn is answered by Das above.

If you want me to word it, it doesn't make much sense to remove much of early BIOS vulnerability with cloaking prox fighters, fast-launching constructors (which we left in) and gunships, then turnaround and say they are too strong. Factions should remain in character, and a more usable heavy cloak is the way to go here.


Want bigger games? Log on to play at the official game time: 9pmET/8pmCT/7pmMT/6pmPT every day of the week. Also Saturdays 8pm UTC.

Makida
Posts: 1793
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 12:04 pm
Location: Canada

Post by Makida »

I like a lot of these changes, but I think the RP and Beacon nerfs are a bit Faircore.

Reduce their scan ranges, or increase their sigs. Don't do both.
Kumquat
Posts: 1242
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Dallas
Contact:

Post by Kumquat »

Why are you people so stupid?
Image
Malicious Wraith
Posts: 3170
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:51 am

Post by Malicious Wraith »

Kumquat wrote:QUOTE (Kumquat @ Mar 5 2011, 01:42 AM) Why are you people so stupid?
I am no supporter of the "XC" line of cores, like many detractors of the recent CC changes, but I find myself agreeing with this.
Unknown wrote:[Just want] to play some games before Alleg dies for good.
I don't want that time to be a @#(!-storm of hate and schadenfreude.
IG: Liquid_Mamba / Fedman
Post Reply