Damaged Ships

Catch-all for all development not having a specific forum.
Cortex
Posts: 2578
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:00 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by Cortex »

Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Jul 9 2006, 09:06 PM) ...
Very good idea!


-- Cort
Image
This is Sparta. Not spa. — Wurf
Image
Typhoone
Posts: 385
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 7:00 am
Location: San Francisco, CA

Post by Typhoone »

Another critical failure could be life support in your ship malfunctioning...

The friendly "O2 gauge" comes online even when you are not podded, but have excessive damage. (Better hope your boosters still work). `gu

Ty.
Image
ogorass
Posts: 2273
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Contact:

Post by ogorass »

Although I love the idea, I think it is an awful idea to implement that. Why? Alleg is horribly hard to learn as it is, the 'realism+' version would drive 99.5% of noobs after 1hr of gameplay IMO.

And if it was to come true, I would suggest a 'tractor' ship to tow disabled ships home /mrgreen.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="mrgreen.gif" />
And like 15% chance of fuel/ammo in cargo exploding after hull going down to 49%.
And 10% chance of pilot being killed once hull goes down 80%, leaving lifeless wreckage floating in space!
Ah yeah! Now THAT is Realsm++ /wub.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":iluv:" border="0" alt="wub.gif" />
Image
Image
Grimmwolf_GB
Posts: 3711
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by Grimmwolf_GB »

Well, sicne we are already dreaming:

Damage specific to the area hit by the weapon should be implemented.

If you hit someone from behind, you most likely kill is booster and his engine. From the side, his side thrusters, from the front, cockpit and lifesupport.

Wing Commander, Privateer and X-Wing had damage areas and it was fun.
Raveen
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 8:00 am
Location: Birmingham, UK
Contact:

Post by Raveen »

ogorass wrote:QUOTE (ogorass @ Jul 11 2006, 10:20 AM) Although I love the idea, I think it is an awful idea to implement that. Why? Alleg is horribly hard to learn as it is, the 'realism+' version would drive 99.5% of noobs after 1hr of gameplay IMO.

And if it was to come true, I would suggest a 'tractor' ship to tow disabled ships home /mrgreen.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="mrgreen.gif" />
And like 15% chance of fuel/ammo in cargo exploding after hull going down to 49%.
And 10% chance of pilot being killed once hull goes down 80%, leaving lifeless wreckage floating in space!
Ah yeah! Now THAT is Realsm++ /wub.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":iluv:" border="0" alt="wub.gif" />
That's why there'd need to be a core side and client element of this feature to allow it to be turned off.

My thoughts about this are you could set (ideally in the core) a set of hull percentages which, once reached trigger damage (maybe, 50%, 25%, 10% if you want the possibility of 3 systems failures before destruction, set it at 0% and there are no failures). Once the threshold is breached a part is damaged. Which part can be selected in the core by a percentage rating, so once hull is at 50% the client does a RNG and selects which part breaks (the probability for breaking for each part is a core value).

With the option of effectively turning the damage off in the core Noir could release DN regular (which has damage as an option like SY) and DN Training (no damage regardless of client settings).

Of course, some poor suckker'd have to code it /mrgreen.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="mrgreen.gif" />

As for Grim's suggestion of damage by hit location, it'd need even more work as you'd have to rework all the models to include the data of which part is where (some sort of texture layer maybe, or by seperating the model into seperate meshes. Either would be hard to code I imagine).
ImageImage
Spidey: Can't think of a reason I'd need to know anything
DrBeginner
Posts: 501
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 7:00 am
Location: In my research lab

Post by DrBeginner »

Grimmwolf_GB wrote:QUOTE (Grimmwolf_GB @ Jul 11 2006, 04:30 AM) Well, sicne we are already dreaming:

Damage specific to the area hit by the weapon should be implemented.

If you hit someone from behind, you most likely kill is booster and his engine. From the side, his side thrusters, from the front, cockpit and lifesupport.

Wing Commander, Privateer and X-Wing had damage areas and it was fun.


Homeworld 2 also. Let me know if you want pics. (HW2 even has damaged skin without having to override the majority of the skin)
I loose my motivation to help out more and more each day to drama like this. Which is why I am mostly /meh on this point. I will continue to play as I always have, with the morals I have been rasied with and if this community finds they don't like myself and others like me who just enjoy playing the game with their friends on TS or squadies, then they can ban us and my Warhammer account, Girlfriend, and IRL activities will get a lot more attention and will thank them.
-TheVoid

I am DrB and I approve of this messege.

Image
Adaven
Posts: 1959
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Greater Ozarks

Post by Adaven »

guitarism
Posts: 2240
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 8:00 am
Location: Richmond

Post by guitarism »

looks like someone chewed on the damn thing. I like...
FIZ wrote:QUOTE (FIZ @ Feb 28 2011, 04:56 PM) After Slap I use Voltaire for light reading.
CronoDroid wrote:QUOTE (CronoDroid @ Jan 23 2009, 07:46 PM) If you're going to go GT, go Exp, unless you're Gooey. But Gooey is nuts.
QUOTE [20:13] <DasSmiter> I like to think that one day he logged on and accidentally clicked his way to the EoR forum
[20:13] <DasSmiter> And his heart exploded in a cloud of fury[/quote]
Ironov
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 7:00 am
Location: Finland

Post by Ironov »

I have been thinking about the battle damage while playing a couple times. It would be really cool to try, but it would make allegiance almost a whole different game. It's really hard to figure the effect it would have on game balance and it would surely ruin some popular strategies. What would happen to a nanned bomb run against massive defence when all the ships would get stuck in the caltrops? /blink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":o" border="0" alt="blink.gif" />

Well it would really be a cool experiment, but being so hard to imagine and needing huge amount of work it might stay a dream too. Even more so on the targetted damage. Would be fun to destroy pooks deployer /tongue.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":P" border="0" alt="tongue.gif" />
I'm new, and I'm clueless!
Post Reply