Boosters

Development area for FreeAllegiance's Community Core.
juckto
Posts: 2332
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 7:00 am
Location: NZ

Post by juckto »

That's a voob comment Compellor. Why risk giving away tech?
Image
Usually though, "skill" is used to covertly mean "match the game exactly to my level of competence." Anyone who is at all worse than me should fail utterly (and humorously!) and anyone better is clearly too caught up in the game and their opinions shouldn't count.
HSharp
Posts: 5192
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 11:18 am
Location: Brum, UK

Post by HSharp »

Yeah compellor you voob :P

Anti Base missiles have same mass so might as well load up on those instead of EMP's.
Image
Image
Compellor
Posts: 994
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2007 12:56 am
Location: Columbus, OH

Post by Compellor »

Unless the enemy is also expansion, I really don't think it matters.
Any job worth doing with a laser is worth doing with many, many lasers. -Khrima
Beyond a shadow of a doubt if you don't watch them like a hawk they will stack their collective balls off - MrChaos on Alleg players
NightRychune
Posts: 3065
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 8:00 am

Post by NightRychune »

All the sup perks that were made in DN were intended to make it competitive with Exp in terms of what it could accomplish, and at the time and for a year or so afterwards sup and exp were still on par. Three and a half-4 years later, people finally understand how to make use of it well, and it's made obvious that Sup right now is way too powerful.
Adept
Posts: 8660
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Turku, Finland

Post by Adept »

NightRychune wrote:QUOTE (NightRychune @ Oct 30 2009, 07:46 PM) Sup right now is way too powerful.
Could just remove heavy booster, and maybe cruise booster too to slow figbees down a bit.
ImageImageImageImageImage
<bp|> Maybe when I grow up I can be a troll like PsycH
<bp|> or an obsessive compulsive paladin of law like Adept
DasSmiter
Posts: 3820
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma

Post by DasSmiter »

Adept wrote:QUOTE (Adept @ Oct 31 2009, 05:32 AM) Could just remove heavy booster, and maybe cruise booster too to slow figbees down a bit.
If I'm not mistaken they can mount lb2 instead anyways :P
ImageImageImage
Get over yourselves, don't try to win arguments on the internet where the option of a punch in the mouth is unavailable
"It is not that I cannot create anything good, but that I will not." And to prove this, he created the peacock.
Corrosion
Posts: 99
Joined: Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:53 pm

Post by Corrosion »

DasSmiter wrote:QUOTE (DasSmiter @ Oct 31 2009, 01:22 PM) If I'm not mistaken they can mount lb2 instead anyways :P
When was the last time anyone bought that.

It would be another tech to buy though and more money down the research drain :/
Image
zombywoof
Posts: 6523
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:59 am
Location: Over the Rainbow

Post by zombywoof »

Corroison wrote:QUOTE (Corroison @ Oct 31 2009, 05:25 PM) It would be another tech to buy though and more money down the research drain :/
?

Right now it's lt boost -> cruise boost
Remove cruise boost and it becomes
lt boost -> lt boost2
Image
Don't find fault, find a remedy; anybody can complain.
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Apr 1 2009, 09:35 PM) But I don't read the forums I only post.
DasSmiter
Posts: 3820
Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma

Post by DasSmiter »

small nerf to the f/b
ImageImageImage
Get over yourselves, don't try to win arguments on the internet where the option of a punch in the mouth is unavailable
"It is not that I cannot create anything good, but that I will not." And to prove this, he created the peacock.
Broodwich
Posts: 5662
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 3:48 am
Location: Raincity

Post by Broodwich »

not really anything that would matter. lb1 on fbs does a pretty good job atm
QUOTE Drizzo: ha ha good old chap
Drizzo: i am a brit
Drizzo: tut tut
Drizzo: wankarrrrrr
Drizzo: i only have sex whilst in the missionary position[/quote] Fas est et ab hoste doceri - Ovid
Post Reply