Pook

Morning · Post by **Morning** » Sun Oct 15, 2006 11:01 pm

Here, you'd better not walkout in traffic. The cops wont stop you, and they wont care if you get squished.

Rebootedrock · Post by **Rebootedrock** » Mon Oct 16, 2006 2:58 am

Mpane wrote:QUOTE (Mpane @ Oct 15 2006, 04:16 AM) In Serbia when you knock off a policeman's hat you get kicked, sweared, beaten and then arrested for resisting arrest. We love our cops /wub.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":iluv:" border="0" alt="wub.gif" /> They build up character /mrgreen.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="mrgreen.gif" />

In soviet russia, you beat up cops.

MrChaos · Post by **MrChaos** » Mon Oct 16, 2006 3:21 am

batman wrote:QUOTE (batman @ Oct 15 2006, 09:17 AM) Mr. C -- makes sense to me.

Thank you Batman for the kind words it makes sense to me too

Unless Im personally being muted by most of the community, I've got to assume we're back to business as usual, which while not bad, seems a little shortsighted. I thought that the recent silliness would have made some impression on others that we need to start discussing some possible enhancements/changes. Rather it seems we need to deal with the sticky situation of if you can talk about tobacco in a game, and a line by line explanation of the RoC as it applies to everyone who plays * shrug * My bad. Carry on.

MrChaos

Qjet · Post by **Qjet** » Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:19 am

Right because talking about things like tobacco, drugs, sex, violence, and the American way will make terrorists out of impressionable youth who we ban on sight anyway. Along with people who might look like they are: possibly violating rules, out to work around rules, or who just don't treat mods as the high and mighty deities that they obviously are. And as we lay more rules about subjects that in the grand scheme of things don't mean anything but small talk, we can go on decimating the community and adding more meaning to the quote "Allegiance - We know drama"
That right there, sounds like a plan

just a suggestion for the next time we go on a rampage and ban people for fun (or sleepless nights): how about we add a twist and ban people for their ethnicity as well? Won't that be fun?

Surely this is better then the alternative of the mods not banning everyone who tickles the funny bones wrong and let the forums burst into chaos and flaming right? Because over-moderation is WAY better then under-moderation.

*sigh* Sorry, but I recently got banned for having a personality. I'm none too happy about it. Though I'm starting to find myself caring less and less... crazy i know...

Dengaroth · Post by **Dengaroth** » Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:24 am

Welcome back from your forum ban, Qjet. I see you haven't learned anything.

[quote=""Qjet's profile""]Joined: 30-September 06[/quote]

Incidentally, unless you're a returning vet playing under a new name (which I doubt, based on the existing information), you don't know how this place worked before and what the consequences of said modus operandi were. So, maybe refraining from comments about the current situation might be a wise thing to do, untill you get your bearings at the very least.

Rebootedrock · Post by **Rebootedrock** » Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:32 am

Deng beat me, except I would have said something like
QUOTE QJet, I see your forum ban is over.

What a great idea to go and mock the mods on one of your first posts.

Gj newb, say hi to the BanHammer™ for me![/quote]

tmc · Post by **tmc** » Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:49 am

1. Qjet, you werent banned for having a personnality - you were banned because youre annoying and noone likes you.

2. The reason why we have lots of moderation against drug talk, etc. is because otherwise, people complain to thal, as has happened in the past. This is protection to prevent it from happening again.

Cadillac · Post by **Cadillac** » Mon Oct 16, 2006 8:09 am

Ok, first there was a horse. It was a good horse, and served us well.

Then we killed it

Then we beat it

Then we atomised it

Now we are splitting the atomic particles.

Its dead, for gods sake leave it alone!

What did the horse ever do to YOU!!

/laugh.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":lol:" border="0" alt="laugh.gif" />

jgbaxter · Post by **jgbaxter** » Mon Oct 16, 2006 8:13 am

This horses name wouldn't start with a "Q" would it? I'm just saying, if it did, then maybe it's not dead yet, and beating it further would be useful as a learning experience... it could be the black knights horse, and as you know, the black knight, well, he's not dead yet. /smile.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":)" border="0" alt="smile.gif" />

takingarms1 · Post by **takingarms1** » Mon Oct 16, 2006 10:51 am

Qjet wrote:QUOTE (Qjet @ Oct 16 2006, 01:19 AM) *sigh* Sorry, but I recently got banned for having a personality. I'm none too happy about it. Though I'm starting to find myself caring less and less... crazy i know...

I guess that last ban didn't teach you much. Perhaps you should just leave voluntarily if you find it all so distasteful? Don't worry about the community, I'm sure we'll carry on without your special 'personality'