The Definitive XRM Poll

Development area for FreeAllegiance's Community Core.
l1ngus
Posts: 1586
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 12:12 pm

Post by l1ngus »

thanks for the great abstract, vortrog!
Vortrog
Posts: 1902
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 7:00 am
Location: Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia

Post by Vortrog »

l1ngus wrote:QUOTE (l1ngus @ Jun 15 2009, 08:58 AM) thanks for the great abstract, vortrog!
You are welcome.

In future, note that I source all my information from discussion threads on CC proposed changes or issues. I compile these things based in what YOU have added to the discussion. If you sit back and say nothing and then expect to wheel around a proposal because you were too lazy or late to question / disprove or propose an alternative solution, then that is unreasonable when I am trying to bring a consensus on what is likely a complicated issue which to be perfectly honest, I generally do not have detailed understanding of, as the COMMUNITY is my consultant team.

This was supposed to be a simple yes or no on the 30%. If it was a no, we could re-assess the proposal and further buff the damage and vote again rather than make a core change then iterate that core change with another vote. By adding extra poll items, all you have done is make it harder to come to a decision on what is the right buff. My view on these things is you have to have a majority vote to pass, and as we have no 'preferences' system, we have no idea if it is a hung vote which way it could go because of the votes that sit in two options that are not expected to be relevant.

I expect the next issue I will be fighterbombers or at least until spidey directs me otherwise. To all concerned CC team and contributors, spam the @#(! out of that topic with your assessments, proposals, lobbying...whatever now. Approve and disprove with facts other's assertions so I can write them off it they are 'hitlerisms'. Dont leave it until I do all the research, ask guys to make their final assessments and comments....draw up a definitive proposal based on everyones discussions.

I am here to help this process for the majority and need your support to do so. If you dont believe that is the case or you believe and can justify proposals as being biased or inadequate, then get it fixed at the draft stage or request my position be revoked.
Image
Adept
Posts: 8660
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Turku, Finland

Post by Adept »

DasSmiter wrote:QUOTE (DasSmiter @ Jun 13 2009, 12:45 AM) A vote for 30% increase is a vote for Hitler!
Sold! :D

So, I voted for the 30% perk, but I think Brood has the best argument in this thread.
ImageImageImageImageImage
<bp|> Maybe when I grow up I can be a troll like PsycH
<bp|> or an obsessive compulsive paladin of law like Adept
Post Reply