I hate EXP

Drizzo · Post by **Drizzo** » Fri May 08, 2009 12:16 pm

IMO it's only worthwhile to take someone seriously and command against them seriously when they're a good commander... these days that's about 5 people.

Against the commanders that you people consider "good" these days, if played to win, the games wouldn't last longer then 30 minutes, and my games often don't, even when I $#@! around.

It's not that I hate putting effort into winning the game. I hate the $#@! ups that have their head so far up their ass they ruin any effort made. SomeRetard@SF or $#@!Face@SRM flying ints when they can't aim. IthinkIamGodlike@SysX or AarmCarriesMetoVictory@PK trying to go solo miners, passing the pods of the 4 people that tried and didn't get it because they were 1 pilot short of the kill, and then bitching at the team for "not having any help." IhasIdea@RT takes half the $#@!ing team on a bomb run vs hvy ints half way across the map on some $#@!ed up pipe dream mission that doesn't even work. SomeVoob@ACE trying to fight hvy ints in their adv fig instead of probing. Dickface@XT sitting in base and calling you all retards.

I would put SG-effort into PuGs, but honestly, you people suck too much for me to care. So until then I will command, get hvy ints, push ops into your sectors, whore your team, and not end the game for another hour or so until someone gets >100 kills.

Dorjan · Post by **Dorjan** » Fri May 08, 2009 12:38 pm

He's right you know...

spideycw · Post by **spideycw** » Fri May 08, 2009 3:57 pm

SpkWill wrote:QUOTE (SpkWill @ May 7 2009, 12:04 PM) If everyone played pu games with the intention of winning the game quality wouldn't be much lower than sgs.

Dunno what SG's you have been playing but the majority of ours have been pretty weak lately. And pug quality seems to be going down hill as well.

Just seems like everyone is less skilled all around for some reason

Norgonq1 · Post by **Norgonq1** » Fri May 08, 2009 4:59 pm

Drizzo wrote:QUOTE (Drizzo @ May 8 2009, 03:16 PM) Ranting

*Slow clap*

Broodwich · Post by **Broodwich** » Fri May 08, 2009 5:08 pm

Its ^IthinkIamGodlike@SysX dumbass

HSharp · Post by **HSharp** » Fri May 08, 2009 5:37 pm

Broodwich wrote:QUOTE (Broodwich @ May 8 2009, 06:08 PM) Its ^IthinkIamGodlike@SysX dumbass

I don't think, I know!

Raziel-01 · Post by **Raziel-01** » Fri May 08, 2009 8:16 pm

LOL
Am I $#@!Face@SRM ?

Ahaneon · Post by **Ahaneon** » Sat May 09, 2009 9:28 pm

Take PPS away from ints. Give em only to ships that carry probes.
Hell reduce int scan range even more. Force ints to rely on scouts for offense.

Of course after you do this everyone will cry about tac being overpowered... but hell, can't have everything.

And just for fun, let SBs carry resonator for an increased price tag.

Gandalf2 · Post by **Gandalf2** » Sat May 09, 2009 10:13 pm

DaShredda wrote:QUOTE (DaShredda @ May 9 2009, 10:38 PM) How about everyone below a certain rank AND below a certain playtime AND below certain stat ratios or something not be allowed to voice their opinions on game balance

Democracy only works assuming people are smart enough to make smart decisions for themselves.
Same with this "Community Core" thing.

The most vocal people in the whole process are the ones that shouldn't even be allowed to have an opinion because they're either

1) Bad

2) Inexperienced (which encompasses bad)

CORE CHANGES WILL NOT MAKE YOU A BETTER PLAYER, YOU'RE BAD AND ALWAYS WILL BE BAD, AS SOON AS YOU GET THE CHANGE YOU'RE LOOKING FOR, YOU'LL STILL SUCK, AND BLAME IT ON SOME OTHER ASPECT OF THE GAME

IT'S YOUR FAULT YOU SUCK

NOW QUIT POSTING AND GO LEARN TO PLAY THE GAME

Move to Rants?

Grimmwolf_GB · Post by **Grimmwolf_GB** » Sat May 09, 2009 10:23 pm

I am a bit confused that Mastametz is ranting against clueless changes in a game he is not allowed to play anymore.