Do you use LtBooster?

Development area for FreeAllegiance's Community Core.
WhiskeyGhost
Posts: 1014
Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:15 pm
Location: Gulf Coast, guess which one?

Post by WhiskeyGhost »

i'd use it if it had a higher top speed then booster, slower accel, lower fuel consumption, and didn't raise signature as much as boosters do.
Image
Rand0m_Numb3r wrote:QUOTE (Rand0m_Numb3r @ Aug 9 2007, 12:27 AM)CURSES I HAVE BEEN DEFEATED!
Shizoku
Posts: 5816
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 7:00 am
Location: Ozzy's right nut.

Post by Shizoku »

Are you not taking into account TF scouts and patties?
Image
Broodwich
Posts: 5662
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 3:48 am
Location: Raincity

Post by Broodwich »

yeah belter bombers and gs as well
QUOTE Drizzo: ha ha good old chap
Drizzo: i am a brit
Drizzo: tut tut
Drizzo: wankarrrrrr
Drizzo: i only have sex whilst in the missionary position[/quote] Fas est et ab hoste doceri - Ovid
Grzegt
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:00 am
Location: Poland

Post by Grzegt »

Shizoku wrote:QUOTE (Shizoku @ Mar 9 2009, 10:04 AM) Are you not taking into account TF scouts and patties?
I start to wonder, maybe some people missed the part about using LtBoost on a ship that can use regular booster. That'd explain why poll results show so many people use it. :)
Grzegt
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:00 am
Location: Poland

Post by Grzegt »

Compellor wrote:QUOTE (Compellor @ Mar 8 2009, 06:44 AM) LtBooster is definitely superior to a fuel tank if you need to boost 20k or more in an int
Actually, no. It is barely equal to additional fuel bottle at 20k and gets worse at smaller distances. That doesn't take sig into consideration, of course.
Read more here.
Evincar
Posts: 1139
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 4:00 am
Location: The darkest side of the sun

Post by Evincar »

i've been toying with this idea: keep it as it is, but reduce signature increase to 0.

what do you think?
Classifiable up to Trolleomorphism.
miromas
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 4:56 pm

Post by miromas »

i use light booster especialy whle galving , useful to avoid enemy bullet(booster is better but when you finish fuel you are an easy target) and i dont think i will change nothing in it , maybe lower a little the signature.
Adept
Posts: 8660
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Turku, Finland

Post by Adept »

Evincar wrote:QUOTE (Evincar @ Mar 9 2009, 02:04 PM) i've been toying with this idea: keep it as it is, but reduce signature increase to 0.

what do you think?
Zero would be evil, but lowering would help it be more useful.
ImageImageImageImageImage
<bp|> Maybe when I grow up I can be a troll like PsycH
<bp|> or an obsessive compulsive paladin of law like Adept
Dorjan
Posts: 5024
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 9:56 am
Location: England

Post by Dorjan »

What's the point of this poll?

To find out if lt.booster is only good for fig/bs / belter bombers, patties etc?
I decided to relive the days gone by in my new blog.
---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Jan 31 2012, 03:09 PM) True story.

Except the big about dorjan being jelly, that's just spidey's ego.
ImageImage
Sealer
Posts: 1583
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 7:37 pm
Location: A womb

Post by Sealer »

To make lt booster useful for figs and ints, I guess.

Although seeing how people "sometimes" use lt booster instead of normal one it may be not necessary. Why would you take lt booster above normal booster? I don't understand, it gives you nearly nothing.
Last edited by Sealer on Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
"For save the world from this epic gay, Clint have this hope : he would put something great and big in his ass."
Post Reply