Interceptor signature
I never understood why figs had higher signature than a base. I think lowering them would be nice. Also upping the ints base sig to 100 would be good. Any more and you would be interfereing with htt runs
QUOTE Drizzo: ha ha good old chap
Drizzo: i am a brit
Drizzo: tut tut
Drizzo: wankarrrrrr
Drizzo: i only have sex whilst in the missionary position[/quote] Fas est et ab hoste doceri - Ovid
Drizzo: i am a brit
Drizzo: tut tut
Drizzo: wankarrrrrr
Drizzo: i only have sex whilst in the missionary position[/quote] Fas est et ab hoste doceri - Ovid
Boosting int, booster1, sig 1: 250%
Boosting enh fig, booster2, shields and missiles down: 250%
I'm not sure what that implies, it's just interesting.
I wouldn't be opposed to a sig increase for ints, but I'm not entirely sure about it. I definitely don't think we should double the sig as Gui is suggesting. Maybe 100, or even 90 to start with.
Boosting enh fig, booster2, shields and missiles down: 250%
I'm not sure what that implies, it's just interesting.
I wouldn't be opposed to a sig increase for ints, but I'm not entirely sure about it. I definitely don't think we should double the sig as Gui is suggesting. Maybe 100, or even 90 to start with.
Any job worth doing with a laser is worth doing with many, many lasers. -Khrima
Beyond a shadow of a doubt if you don't watch them like a hawk they will stack their collective balls off - MrChaos on Alleg players
Beyond a shadow of a doubt if you don't watch them like a hawk they will stack their collective balls off - MrChaos on Alleg players
Excacly. Isn't that the basic idea behind the Community Core project.Xeretov wrote:QUOTE (Xeretov @ Feb 17 2009, 02:29 AM) I'd rather see this implemented in small steps: Increase the int sig to 125% base, see how it fares and go from there, rather than make gigantic changes.
<bp|> Maybe when I grow up I can be a troll like PsycH
<bp|> or an obsessive compulsive paladin of law like Adept
I said this 6 months ago.
Base sig should be 100%, like an unshielded fig etc
Base sig should be 100%, like an unshielded fig etc
I decided to relive the days gone by in my new blog.
---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?
---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Jan 31 2012, 03:09 PM) True story.
Except the big about dorjan being jelly, that's just spidey's ego.
Well it helps when theres an update 
Isn't that why we moved over from DN in the first place? Eh? EH?
Isn't that why we moved over from DN in the first place? Eh? EH?FIZ wrote:QUOTE (FIZ @ Feb 28 2011, 04:56 PM) After Slap I use Voltaire for light reading.
QUOTE [20:13] <DasSmiter> I like to think that one day he logged on and accidentally clicked his way to the EoR forumCronoDroid wrote:QUOTE (CronoDroid @ Jan 23 2009, 07:46 PM) If you're going to go GT, go Exp, unless you're Gooey. But Gooey is nuts.
[20:13] <DasSmiter> And his heart exploded in a cloud of fury[/quote]
-
CronoDroid
- Posts: 4606
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 8:00 am
- Contact:
-
WhiskeyGhost
- Posts: 1014
- Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 9:15 pm
- Location: Gulf Coast, guess which one?
Let's not go crazy here, 100% signature would be fine, any more then that would probably be a bit much for a first step. Any higher and everyone will just scream about how it's broken and demand it come back down to 75% 
edit: scaling the signature would be somewhat advisable, in my opinion.
i.e. 110% lt, 100% regular, 90% hvy
edit: scaling the signature would be somewhat advisable, in my opinion.
i.e. 110% lt, 100% regular, 90% hvy
Last edited by WhiskeyGhost on Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rand0m_Numb3r wrote:QUOTE (Rand0m_Numb3r @ Aug 9 2007, 12:27 AM)CURSES I HAVE BEEN DEFEATED!
Ints were not designed to be able to kill anything anywhere at any time. It's supposed to be two of the three - Kill anything anywhere, but not at anytime. Or kill anywhere at anytime, but not anything. Or kill anything at anytime, but not everywhereCronoDroid wrote:QUOTE (CronoDroid @ Feb 17 2009, 05:35 PM) Either way, I don't think ints need a change. They're meant to be good at killing things after all!
Fighters, on the other hand, were meant to be more of 'kill almost anything at almost everywhere at almost every time'
