Free Allegiance Forums

Not ashamed, rather disappointed that we managed to lose this. Anyway I really enjoyed this game, I'm sure some things were done properly and again it piss me off that sysx seems more coordinated and focused on everything all the time

QUOTE (Hellsyng @ Aug 29 2010, 07:49 PM) Booting becomes a problem with only one nick...

Usually I'm far from such radical approach, this time I guess IB is correct. Again - knowing that boot means you probably will have to wait to play (at least in standard, big game) will force players to ...

Frankly I've never seen many reasons for hiders. "Fun" factor is questionable at best, i'd rather say it's unnecessary mess. Having just one nick IMO forces players to behave little bit more reasonable and mature since your actions will stick to your name forver.

Damn... another half year of waiting with hope to reclaim nick I'd like

Huh, I'm not sure my reply will fit this thread.

Well played SysX, no question we were soundly beaten. I'm quite disappointed with performace on our side, hoped for some epic battle!
We'll meet in finals next year! For now - congatulations

Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Nov 22 2009, 03:33 AM) And that's still a better chance than PK have of beating SysX, which of course RT did but PK failed to do in the league.

Touché.

Huh, looks like I'm only PK who can admit SysX was better in this game. GG and I hope we'll beat RT so we can have rematch!

QUOTE (spideycw @ Sep 24 2009, 01:40 AM) You PK should be ashamed of your posts on your internal forum about this issue. All of you crying about how I booted DD and ruined the game he was commanding.

Did any of you stop to even read the full logs and notice he stayed in the game the whole time ...

Great event and some really good games. Congratulations SysX!

That too. As I stated before use of FBs and XRM bombers is the same atm, we could actually just remove one or other. Or make them significantly different.