its on today nablets
hurrah!
game of thrones season 3
-
tsubaki_sanjuro
- Posts: 835
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 7:00 am
- Location: Office of the Holy Inquisition, Vatican City
- Contact:
-
CronoDroid
- Posts: 4606
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 8:00 am
- Contact:
Saw it, pretty meh, I like A Song of Ice and Fire for the story, in Game of Thrones it is rushed, the overall story seems similar but there is so much missing when compared to the books that it just makes the acting seem all wooden.
All Game of Thrones is good for is tits and those are pretty easy to find on the internet, I doubt I will be watching any more of GoT.
All Game of Thrones is good for is tits and those are pretty easy to find on the internet, I doubt I will be watching any more of GoT.
-
Malicious Wraith
- Posts: 3170
- Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:51 am
I love ASOIAF for the characters, the story, and the setting. Although the books are just $#@!ing amazing, I disagree with Sharpy here. I find the series is also good fun. I like to cheer for the characters, even though I know what is going to happen.
Although there was no Arstan Whitebeard, I still think Ser Barristan Selmy was a badass last night.
Although there was no Arstan Whitebeard, I still think Ser Barristan Selmy was a badass last night.
Last edited by Malicious Wraith on Mon Apr 01, 2013 4:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
IG: Liquid_Mamba / FedmanUnknown wrote:[Just want] to play some games before Alleg dies for good.
I don't want that time to be a @#(!-storm of hate and schadenfreude.
-
Spunkmeyer
- Posts: 2013
- Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2003 7:00 am
- Location: Contact me regarding: CC, Slayer and AllegWiki.
Which ones? I'm not very fond of Daenerys myself, a chracter I love in the books. Stannis is horrible, but then he is pretty horrible in the books too (you just don't get a sense for wtf is going through his mind)Viscur wrote:QUOTE (Viscur @ Apr 1 2013, 04:48 AM) Man, theres some actors I wish would get killed in the series, mainly because I hate their acting style. I'm convinced its their acting style and not how they were written.
Want bigger games? Log on to play at the official game time: 9pmET/8pmCT/7pmMT/6pmPT every day of the week. Also Saturdays 8pm UTC.
Further proof of MW's diminished mental faculties.Malicious Wraith wrote:QUOTE (Malicious Wraith @ Apr 1 2013, 04:04 PM) Although there was no Arstan Whitebeard, I still think Ser Barristan Selmy was a badass last night.
Really, badass, he knocks a ball out a girls hand while holding a knife (clever thing to do) then stabs a bug, badass man!
-
tsubaki_sanjuro
- Posts: 835
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 7:00 am
- Location: Office of the Holy Inquisition, Vatican City
- Contact:
-
CronoDroid
- Posts: 4606
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 8:00 am
- Contact:
Really? I think live action adaptations are great because they allow you a glimpse into someone else's interpretation of the source material, while also offering acting. Rather than just imagining how characters feel, you can see actual people expressing how they think the characters are feeling.HSharp wrote:QUOTE (HSharp @ Apr 1 2013, 08:09 AM) Saw it, pretty meh, I like A Song of Ice and Fire for the story, in Game of Thrones it is rushed, the overall story seems similar but there is so much missing when compared to the books that it just makes the acting seem all wooden.
All Game of Thrones is good for is tits and those are pretty easy to find on the internet, I doubt I will be watching any more of GoT.
It's why I like the LotR films better than the books, and why I'm conflicted on whether I like the Harry Potter books more or less than the films.
Peter Dinklage is just great too.
I think with TV and film compared to books, you're trading story detail for a more dynamic and visual experience. Also I don't think the TV show is any less deep than the books, it's just less detailed. The themes and character motivations are still all there.

