Desperate times

Allegiance discussion not belonging in another forum.
Post Reply
kramari
Posts: 1293
Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2007 8:35 pm
Location: Zagreb, Croatia

Post by kramari »

Just send the damn mass email. One email from FAO is not spam.
Image
Dome
Posts: 4306
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:44 am
Location: Portland, OR

Post by Dome »

I do not believe we will make it to the fall tournament with squads intact, and not having squad games in the summer is not helping.

We need to consolidate all remaining squad players into 4 squads.

I am aware of the pride that squads have and how the thought of merging is a turn off, but desperate times call for desperate measures. We no longer have enough people to populate as many squads as we have now. With 4 squads we could have squad games every weekend, have enough time to mesh before the tourney, and have squad games more than 10v10.

You all must know that merges are inevitable or we should just uninstall right now. There is no point to continue to think that our inactive players will someday come back. We need to evolve to the player base.

Outright merging is one option.. having a player base squad lottery is another.. There are numerous options for how we do it. It will take patience and a willingness to compromise from all players.

In order to keep the game going squad consolidation must occur one way or another.

What do you think?
Last edited by Dome on Sat Jul 21, 2012 8:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
qqmwoarplox
Posts: 1647
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 8:18 pm

Post by qqmwoarplox »

I agree.
If you cant show 10 as a squad theres no real point in having a squad, you just holding loyal squadplayers back.
Last edited by qqmwoarplox on Sat Jul 21, 2012 7:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
raumvogel
Posts: 5910
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 7:00 am
Location: My lawn
Contact:

Post by raumvogel »

They can always split back into the old squads as player base grows. Inactive players do return, though. If someone comes back and finds 20 vs 20 pick ups on a steady basis, then themselves would then keep playing. Another reason to implement an auto comm feature.
Image
qqmwoarplox
Posts: 1647
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2012 8:18 pm

Post by qqmwoarplox »

raumvogel wrote:QUOTE (raumvogel @ Jul 21 2012, 03:01 AM) I agree with dome.
okay.
raumvogel
Posts: 5910
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2003 7:00 am
Location: My lawn
Contact:

Post by raumvogel »

Wow, Q, you sure are talented.
Last edited by raumvogel on Sat Jul 21, 2012 8:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
SP4WN
Posts: 1634
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 7:00 am
Contact:

Post by SP4WN »

I support this.
peet
Posts: 4972
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 6:57 pm
Location: Holland

Post by peet »

Sympathetic idea. But where do you draw the line? Merge to 4, 3, 2 squads?
Image
Dome
Posts: 4306
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 7:44 am
Location: Portland, OR

Post by Dome »

peet wrote:QUOTE (peet @ Jul 21 2012, 02:50 AM) Sympathetic idea. But where do you draw the line? Merge to 4, 3, 2 squads?
Address the need as it's required. 4 would be good for now. 3 or 2 later wouldn't be the end of the world. Whatever it takes for games.
Dibbley2
Posts: 257
Joined: Fri May 22, 2009 12:44 am
Location: England

Post by Dibbley2 »

Allegiance


EvE



anoth said............................ :roll:
Post Reply