Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 10:28 pm
How do you feel about old games being sold by companies like GOG and Steam?
I have seen many games from abandonware sites now being sold on gog and steam which makes me a bit sad really. I understand the problem with pirating games vs buying games but I feel it's very different when it comes to abandonware games where buying it from gog doesn't pay the developers (mainly because the developers are defunct).
I know some people praise GOG and steam selling old games because they couldn't get them before but it seems sad that they make so much money from doing very little work, they have no marginal cost and any money they make does not go into developing new games which annoys me after people put time and effort into getting these great games available for free on abandonware sites and then they have to cease and desist because someone has brought the right to sell the game.
Some will say that GOG and Steam do good work in making the buggy games playable for modern machines but honestly I have not seen a single case of that, I have seen the good people from DOSBox make a fantastic emulator to allow modern machines to play the old games, and the games which were buggy back then seem buggy now (a hallmark of good emulation) but I really haven't seen a single game that GOG or Steam fixed that wasn't the work of someone else who did it freely.
I love abandonware, it let's me play games the old games I used to play (and would suck at by being a kid) and the old games I didn't get a chance to play, I found Allegiance through an abandonware site and I wouldn't have been here without finding it through that link so with that in mind I have a fear (irrational?) that one day Microsoft will sell the right to sell Allegiance to Steam or GOG and then it will be the end of Free Allegiance and all the hard work given freely by other people over the years would be used to make money for some company.
So I would be interested to hear your views, is GOG good for spreading the word of old games or bad for charging for what used to be free information?
I have seen many games from abandonware sites now being sold on gog and steam which makes me a bit sad really. I understand the problem with pirating games vs buying games but I feel it's very different when it comes to abandonware games where buying it from gog doesn't pay the developers (mainly because the developers are defunct).
I know some people praise GOG and steam selling old games because they couldn't get them before but it seems sad that they make so much money from doing very little work, they have no marginal cost and any money they make does not go into developing new games which annoys me after people put time and effort into getting these great games available for free on abandonware sites and then they have to cease and desist because someone has brought the right to sell the game.
Some will say that GOG and Steam do good work in making the buggy games playable for modern machines but honestly I have not seen a single case of that, I have seen the good people from DOSBox make a fantastic emulator to allow modern machines to play the old games, and the games which were buggy back then seem buggy now (a hallmark of good emulation) but I really haven't seen a single game that GOG or Steam fixed that wasn't the work of someone else who did it freely.
I love abandonware, it let's me play games the old games I used to play (and would suck at by being a kid) and the old games I didn't get a chance to play, I found Allegiance through an abandonware site and I wouldn't have been here without finding it through that link so with that in mind I have a fear (irrational?) that one day Microsoft will sell the right to sell Allegiance to Steam or GOG and then it will be the end of Free Allegiance and all the hard work given freely by other people over the years would be used to make money for some company.
So I would be interested to hear your views, is GOG good for spreading the word of old games or bad for charging for what used to be free information?