Belters (Virulence) vs. Iron Coalition (Dorjan), HiHigher, 1.0, 1.0, normal, 27 minutes
-XT goes Midhigh with an op and walks a carrier low
-SF goes Midlow with both cons, plants their TP next to their home, plants their op in front of their TP
-XT's finds both Gat2 and DF2 in the first 30 seconds of the game and I maneuver our carrier to their TP, forcing SF's miners to retreat. One miner rips into the TP and Weedman annihilates it.
-SF mines out a full rock high, but XT pushes our carrier into their home and destroys their full miner and both of their other miners while sacrificing our carrier and a TP con low.
-XT builds a TP con high next to our home for future mining purposes.
-SF forms up to rush our miners, but is ultimately destroyed by Clay's prox as we get enh figs up and a second carrier out low.
-I plant a TP low as we continue an all out offensive against SF's miners, forcing them to scramble to attempt to stop us in lt ints.
-SF mines out a rock midhigh, but their miner is ambushed in their home and dies.
-SF manages to get one miner load out of a miner, moves their miner midlow to their op, mines out another rock.
-We build a TP midlow next to their op and move another carrier in next to their TP to rush the miner at their op, but it manages to escape.
-SF launches a sup con, but it is delayed by our carrier at their TP. Their entire team rushes our carrier.
-We withdraw from our carrier and form up a bomb run at the TP we planted low, and bomb their home with AC2 and AB2. Their sup con rips into their TP as Bucket enters their home with an uneyed bomber and kills their garrison before their sup builds.
-I am mildly disappointed, as I was looking forward to AC3 completing and annihilating their pending IC figs with it.
-SF only managed to get two miner loads outside of their home for the entire game.
There is a reason I advised SF to prepare adequate amounts of lube for this game. I was entirely serious.
XT vs SF
TBH we played very poorly and you guys did play very well.
GG XT
GG XT
I decided to relive the days gone by in my new blog.
---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?


---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Jan 31 2012, 03:09 PM) True story.
Except the big about dorjan being jelly, that's just spidey's ego.


-
TheCorsair
- Posts: 2203
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 12:32 pm
- Location: Сою́з Сове́тски
GG.. the 3 miner kills in 2 mins was very nice
By score
By Kills
By score
By Kills
Last edited by TheCorsair on Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Neither east nor west" 
UNITED FOREVER IN FRIENDSHIP AND LABOUR
"The clouds are fleeting over every country, we stand fast, for no kind of rain will take away our smiles."

UNITED FOREVER IN FRIENDSHIP AND LABOUR
"The clouds are fleeting over every country, we stand fast, for no kind of rain will take away our smiles."
Your game was very "meh", executed very well but we could've easily $#@!ed over your start but half the team had a retard moment that lasted the entire game.Drizzo wrote:QUOTE (Drizzo @ Feb 21 2010, 09:23 PM) I don't think you guys played very poorly. You just played like you always do, and we played like we used to.
We played as we usually do? No, that was our worst. We'll see you next time XT. Bring it.
I decided to relive the days gone by in my new blog.
---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?


---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Jan 31 2012, 03:09 PM) True story.
Except the big about dorjan being jelly, that's just spidey's ego.


not to be a dick but just about every game @sf claims they played poorly. Generally this is confined to adept and striker...don't tell me you are starting it too!Dorjan wrote:QUOTE (Dorjan @ Feb 21 2010, 03:58 PM) TBH we played very poorly and you guys did play very well.
GG XT
I'm sorry I don't remember any of it. For you the day spideycw graced your squad with utter destruction was the most important day of your life. But for me, it was Sunday
Idanmel wrote:QUOTE (Idanmel @ Mar 19 2012, 05:54 AM) I am ashamed for all the drama I caused, I have much to learn on how to behave when things don't go my way.
My apologies.
TBH it really is against SysX, XT and sometimes PK.spideycw wrote:QUOTE (spideycw @ Feb 21 2010, 09:42 PM) not to be a dick but just about every game @sf claims they played poorly. Generally this is confined to adept and striker...don't tell me you are starting it too!
Ask SRM, GB, ACE and co. We always put on a great show. I just think all the pilots are just thinking "we've lost" before we start against you lot.
Seriously.
example: We spot their carrier + a few figs low, our ints CONTINUE to fly AWAY from the carrier group which was heading in. Our OP and tele were nearly undefended when XT striked then we did $#@! all and only about 4 pilots actually responded and the rest just ignored it. This same carrier then pushed on into our home through a home caltrop / tower to kill the 3 miners. Our team $#@!ed about this game. That wouldn't have happened if anyone was actually awake in SF. Makes me feel everyone just felt like there were no point.
Last edited by Dorjan on Sun Feb 21, 2010 9:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I decided to relive the days gone by in my new blog.
---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?


---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?
Cookie Monster wrote:QUOTE (Cookie Monster @ Jan 31 2012, 03:09 PM) True story.
Except the big about dorjan being jelly, that's just spidey's ego.


Everyone can have an off day, and I'd trust Dorj's ability as a com to tell generally being outclassed from a sucky performance. Looks like a decent XT team though, even on full power SF would have struggled IMO.spideycw wrote:QUOTE (spideycw @ Feb 21 2010, 09:42 PM) not to be a dick but just about every game @sf claims they played poorly. Generally this is confined to adept and striker...don't tell me you are starting it too!




