Page 1 of 1

Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 12:24 am
by Gandalf2
OK this is what I think the situation is - tell me if I am right or wrong /mrgreen.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=":D" border="0" alt="mrgreen.gif" />

1) ASGS was built on .NET 1.1, and was incompatible with .NET 2.0.
2) Vista SP1 pushes .NET 2.0 onto the system.
3) Therefore, Vista SP1 = no allegiance.
4) However, A new version of ASGS compatible with .NET 2.0 has since been released.
5) So, does this mean SP1 is OK to install now?

I only ask because I think I need .NET 2.0 installed to get SQL Server Express to install properly, but if I try to manually install .NET 2.0 it says that it is already installed as part of the operating system, which I don't think is true (for example, I can't see it on the add/remove program list but I can see .NET 1.1 on there).

Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 4:27 am
by naco
I use vista SP1 and it works fine. So go ahead.

Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 6:52 am
by Grimmwolf_GB
Your list is not entirely correct (.net 3 was pushed in SP1 and it caused the problems). ASGS has no problems with any .net version though.

Posted: Sun May 04, 2008 5:13 pm
by ImmortalZ
Your 4) is wrong.

The new ASGS is not built for .NET 2.0. It is built to be compatible to 2.0 SP1 (which broke 1.1 based Xenocode).

Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 7:15 pm
by ogorass
In short: yah, Alleg will work with Vista SP1 and no .NET Framework install will break it /wink.gif" style="vertical-align:middle" emoid=";)" border="0" alt="wink.gif" /> Closing.