i miss nix!

lexaal · Post by **lexaal** » Thu Apr 22, 2010 8:09 pm

Compellor wrote:QUOTE (Compellor @ Apr 22 2010, 04:54 PM) XRM 1 is basic sup.

Jimen · Post by **Jimen** » Thu Apr 22, 2010 8:37 pm

They can only be mounted by heavy bombers, though, and typically people upgrade their techbase before they upgrade their garr, because starbase sucks. XRMs on regular bombers could be an interesting mid-to-late-game base-clearing tech as an alternative to galvs, but heavy bombers are just too expensive and unreliable to make it viable compared to sup's other options.

Camaro · Post by **Camaro** » Fri Apr 23, 2010 2:54 am

Bard wrote:QUOTE (Bard @ Apr 22 2010, 12:48 AM) If that was true, EoR would have been the most popular core around because it was COMPLETELY different than everything else out there.

Lots of people want phoenix because it was different and CHEESY.

Lots of people didn't like EoR because it was different and HARDER (except for some of the ints, which were ungodly powerful).

i LOVED EoR, especially the broken belters economy.

BetaTester · Post by **BetaTester** » Fri Apr 23, 2010 4:30 pm

BlackViper wrote:QUOTE (BlackViper @ Apr 21 2010, 11:48 PM) Imago,

Where is the written permission from either Noir or 3DRT? I spent a lot of time researching this a few years ago. That is what it would take. OR purchase a model pack from 3DRT. BUT, by general concensus, Noir specifically asked we not use his work. See my first sentence.

Imago re-obtained permission from 3DRT directly, for using the "Sci-fi fighters model pack" in Allegiance, after Noir went AFK.

The models have been re-worked to Allegiance format (again). The DN core is gone...Noir is out of the picture.

E-mail Imago if interested.

BetaTester · Post by **BetaTester** » Fri Apr 23, 2010 4:42 pm

Rock Raider wrote:QUOTE (Rock Raider @ Apr 21 2010, 05:09 PM) Not if they're copyrighted.

Imago re-obtained permission on behalf of the Alelgiance development community via. email from the creator of the models after the last Noir/nix discussion found in the Core subforums about a year or two ago.

kalix · Post by **kalix** » Fri Apr 23, 2010 5:55 pm

wow i cant believe that this "anyway any1 gona make nix a part of the last cc? "
got 65 posts!
NOW tell me again how people DONT think about nix?

Cadillac · Post by **Cadillac** » Fri Apr 23, 2010 7:21 pm

kalix wrote:QUOTE (kalix @ Apr 23 2010, 06:55 PM) wow i cant believe that this "anyway any1 gona make nix a part of the last cc? "
got 65 posts!
NOW tell me again how people DONT think about nix?

$#@!ing learn to read.

Deathrender · Post by **Deathrender** » Fri Apr 23, 2010 8:51 pm

Nix was removed so that this could be added.

Post by **BlackViper** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 2:01 am

BetaTester wrote:QUOTE (BetaTester @ Apr 23 2010, 11:42 AM) Imago re-obtained permission on behalf of the Alelgiance development community via. email from the creator of the models after the last Noir/nix discussion found in the Core subforums about a year or two ago.

Show me it in writing. Because I personally had a phone conversation with them, they would NOT put anything in writing a few years back. Plus again, the general conclusion was until Noir gave us his go ahead, we would not use his faction.

sambasti · Post by **sambasti** » Sat Apr 24, 2010 2:10 am

Xeretov wrote:QUOTE (Xeretov @ Apr 21 2010, 09:57 PM) You say this, yet have you used XRM even once since CC_06?

Has anyone?

I have, and I'm telling you, it needs a perk. I went bios, and for 30 mins after I got XRM I had people yelling at me because I hadn't partialed FBs while XRM was researching. We ended up winning that with hvy bomb runs just before FBs came online.