Divided TS channels during Alleg Wars are a great example of why divided comms do not work (9-11 is too. Is there a 9-11 equivalent of Godwinning a thread?). Roles change too quickly to justify the overhead of officially declaring roles; and limiting the info you receive is actually a disability because you have the power and time to react to almost any situation in the game, if you are told immediately.Mryddlin wrote:QUOTE (Mryddlin @ Jan 19 2010, 09:45 AM) But GOD it would be nice to see, at a glance, who accepted the duties instead of just sending over the chat 'I need miner D', i.e.:
- Miner Defence (3) (expandable trees so you can see the names/ranks of the players that accepted that task)
- Pilot A
- Pilot B
- Pilot C
- Miner Offense (6)
- Escort (2)
- Unassigned (first list to check for noobs and people to boot, everyone should be grabbing a role and based on the numbers assigned it would be easy to figure out what is needed, i.e. if Miner D have 1 person doing the task it's obvious that more are need and you join that role as it't the highest priority)
Having a general orders screen that the commander can push the 5 tasks that P1 laid out (or more) up and down in priority and the commander gets a message when someone joins that task would help a lot.
Taking that a step further the chat and wing system should be extended to automatically enroll a pilot into a wing/chat channel when they join the role and automatically subscribe to the proper drone notifications (i.e. you are on miner D you see the miner move orders, when a miner is finished and heading back to base the miner should broadcast that to the miner D wing).
The chat defaults should be: Commander = Team Chat, Pilots = Role Chats, Unassigned = Team Chat, with the commander having the ability to move pilots into roles with a couple of key strokes (i.e. your commanding and you need someone to do miner D that you trust, slap them into the miner D role and system notifies them of the role change)..
Anyway I know this mainly a thought experiment and I will keep any further discussion on communication issues to the development forums.
To facetiously reword your argument, "My right to dick off during the game overrules everyone else's right to play in a way which will win".SharpFish wrote:QUOTE (SharpFish @ Jan 19 2010, 01:03 PM) I wonder why those excusing arbitrary exercise of power always make this self-justifying excuse? This is absolutely classic self-rationalisation, the stuff of which, in the real world, revolutions are made. Your odious elitism only confirms the point. Why SHOULD new players give this game a second chance when they get abused in this manner? Well surprise surprise, a lot of them don't. Even some of the old hands, no doubt, get bored of the power-tripping narcissists who feel it's perfectly reasonable to exclude people from, you know, actually playing the game at whim.
Your punctuation is impressive, though.





IMO