Posted: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:43 pm
Hmm... Frag as in the permabanned Fragtzack?Drizzo wrote:QUOTE (Drizzo @ Oct 7 2009, 06:31 PM) Mockery and ridicule are one of the staples of this game, Frag.
Hmm... Frag as in the permabanned Fragtzack?Drizzo wrote:QUOTE (Drizzo @ Oct 7 2009, 06:31 PM) Mockery and ridicule are one of the staples of this game, Frag.
You are welcome. I hope you learn from this lesson, so you can build brighter future for yourself in the FAO community.Shautsky wrote:QUOTE (Shautsky @ Oct 7 2009, 05:28 PM) Thank you for clarifying that mockery and ridicule are acceptable.
Malicious Wraith wrote:QUOTE (Malicious Wraith @ Oct 6 2009, 08:48 PM) How do I unbuckle my belt so I can take a huge smelly deuce on this thread.
WAT KEY I PRESS TO MAKE POO
Nuke was the only person who actually bothered to correct him, though, and since sarcasm meters don't work over the internet, I can forgive him for not realizing it straight away since Spidey and PK both spent most of the chatlog sarcastically agreeing with Bass, which is the reason I was so confused about it before. Why? Because if you don't already know that Bass is wrong, the chatlog would tend to suggest that he was correct - you just see one person telling Bass he's wrong, one person telling Bass he's right, and one person pretending he doesn't know the answer and is just learning it from Bass. The thread's full of people laughing at how wrong Bass was, while the chatlog seemed to suggest that he was correct.phoenix1 wrote:QUOTE (phoenix1 @ Oct 7 2009, 11:28 AM) Ok, look, here's why people are laughing at him.
Imagine you just got here, and you're like, "How come I can't mount minigun on my fighters?" Someone chuckles and corrects you, saying that miniguns are for interceptors not fighters. Now you start calling them a retard, saying that "no, in fact, miniguns go on fighters." At this point they're just going to make fun of you because a) you're wrong and b) you're being obstinate about it. It's not that this is "basic" information, it's more that it's information that's readily available, and that they tried to give to him, but he refused to have it.
Imagine if some cadet was reading in the cadet forums, and then posted a big, long post to the effect of "Actually, Scouts have terrible range, and you should never probe!" And then continued arguing his point.
For the record, there has been not one report of any posts in this thread nor, to the best of my knowledge, has anyone complained to BV about the behaviour in game. TE's rule has been "Mock the action, not the person" and whilst I don't think this community follows that 100% of the time I think that it was happening here.Shautsky wrote:QUOTE (Shautsky @ Oct 7 2009, 07:35 AM) Smells a lot like being ridiculed for lack of knowledge of a computer video game. Of course riducle isn't a personal attack, this is the internet and a computer game and all is allowed until the epeens get ridiculed themselves.
Roar, fear my epeen of a computer game knowledge or I shall mock you. RRoar! The super kidz cool club is not for you!
Ridiculing for poor pilot performance is not a personal attack either! Go go epeens!.
at internet accepted behavior.
I enjoy this, personally. Have not heard a word of complaint from the guys, so I have not said a thing.Raveen wrote:QUOTE (Raveen @ Oct 7 2009, 01:41 PM) If you want that to stop then all of DSM needs to think about their posting habits.