TakingArms wrote:QUOTE (TakingArms @ Dec 28 2009, 08:41 PM) From someone who used to do this for a living, I would suggest that doing mock-ups in photoshop to settle on a design rather than starting with code is usually a quicker way to get what you want. In my experience, the graphic design part usually takes a lot longer than the code part.
Also, I would suggest that your current mockup is a bit too glitzy. Too much rah rah, bright and shiney, not enough usability. And I hate a video embedded on the front page, it just slows things down. A still pic with a link is better, that way people who want to view the video can click it and wait rather than forcing every visitor to wait for the embed to load.
I also currently do this for a living and a embed will not effect the people who do not care for it, as they'll just click off the page while it loads. He did a mockup to what he wants. *shrug* I'm treating him like a client and doing it for him
I decided to relive the days gone by in my new blog.
---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?
Bacon wrote:QUOTE (Bacon @ Dec 28 2009, 04:02 PM) IB and Jerako also join the ignore list.
Damn and I thought only I was having a lucky day.
If you are really lucky he will spam you with pms while saying he will auto delete any of yours. It like having a 3 year old in my pm box!
I'm sorry I don't remember any of it. For you the day spideycw graced your squad with utter destruction was the most important day of your life. But for me, it was Sunday
Idanmel wrote:QUOTE (Idanmel @ Mar 19 2012, 05:54 AM) I am ashamed for all the drama I caused, I have much to learn on how to behave when things don't go my way.
TA, I had it the way you describe in my 1st iteration more or less. Everybody said to do away with the link and just make the video there when the page loads =) Not saying you're wrong, but just that I'm getting "critiques" from every angle and don't be offended if I, uh, ignore you, hahahahahaha.
I do agree though that it's a bit too glitzy. I think it's the background and the buttons. I'm gonna try to tone them down a bit. Not completely -- we do need a bit of glitz -- but make it less busy. My buddy who gave me the "tab it all!" idea said that it was too "busy" and I agree. He said he liked the looks of the original page better, but liked the info on my page better. So I'll give it another go, perhaps, or I'll delegate to somebody who wants to help out =)
Last edited by Bacon_00 on Mon Dec 28, 2009 10:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Leave Bacon alone. When he's unsure of what sector he's in somehow it works out better." -Lee
This topic has become way too long and has way too many personal attacks for me to know wtf is going on anymore.
Anyone who's interested in having a website they've written (ie: html stuff. Not just pics of what HTML would look like), send me a PM to be included in the poll thing that will be thrown up.
I don't like the infighting going on in this topic, but if the end-result is a better homepage then I'm all for it
*DING DING DING*
FIGHT!
--TE
The Allegiance community currently hates their sysadmin because he is doing: [Too Much] [____________|] [Too Little]
Current reason: Removing the PayPal contribute page. Send Bitcoin instead: 1EccFi98tR5S9BYLuB61sFfxKqqgSKK8Yz. This scale updates regularly.
I decided to relive the days gone by in my new blog.
---
Remember, what I say is IMO always. If I say that something sucks, it actually means "I think it sucks" OK?
QUOTE Drizzo: ha ha good old chap
Drizzo: i am a brit
Drizzo: tut tut
Drizzo: wankarrrrrr
Drizzo: i only have sex whilst in the missionary position[/quote] Fas est et ab hoste doceri - Ovid
