Climate Scientists Laugh at Global Warming Hysteria.

[SumVeritas]

QUOTE (Wasp @ Jan 31 2017, 10:22 AM) That's what I'm asking of you! If you want to state a claim, YOU bare the burden of proof.

I'm sorry, i really tried to find a youtube video of Elmo singing about global warming facts for you, you know to bring the discussion to the level of your other post, maybe i should have search for pepe the frog.
but i guess this wasn't facts thrown already into the discussion.

QUOTE (Adept @ Jan 24 2017, 09:22 AM) https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/20 ... ak-records

or
http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

QUOTE (Wasp @ Jan 31 2017, 10:22 AM) "So how much confidence should we place upon IPCC objectivity to guide regulatory policies? Consider but a couple of statements from key inside sources in their own words.
As written in a 2007 journal Nature article by Kevin Trenberth, a lead author of 2001 and 2007 IPCC reports: “None of the [global climate simulation] models used by the IPCC are initialized to the observed state, and none of the climate states in the models correspond even remotely to the current observed state.”"

The author is actually bidding for a more comprehensive prediction model.
From said article
QUOTE So if the science is settled, then what are we planning for and adapting to? A consensus has emerged that “warming of the climate system is unequivocal” to quote the 2007 IPCC Fourth Assessment Working Group I Summary for Policy Makers (pdf) and the science is convincing that humans are the cause. Hence mitigation of the problem: stopping or slowing greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere is essential. The science is clear in this respect.

However, the science is not done because we do not have reliable or regional predictions of climate. But we need them. Indeed it is an imperative! So the science is just beginning. Beginning, that is, to face up to the challenge of building a climate information system that tracks the current climate and the agents of change, that initializes models and makes predictions, and that provides useful climate information on many time scales regionally and tailored to many sectoral needs.[/quote]

http://blogs.nature.com/climatefeedback/20...of_climate.html

QUOTE (Wasp @ Jan 31 2017, 10:22 AM) You are simply a Global Warming fanboy with zero understanding about the subject.

is this suposed to be an insult¿?, what are you afraid of, that your government will forbid you something¿?

Finally, i think your confusing a scientific discussion with a policy making one.

QUOTE lo stupido è un incapacitato
ad agire, o almeno ad agire correttamente,
perché la realtà ha su di lui un effetto di
stordimento che lo rende, appunto, temporaneamente
o perennemente “instupidito”.[/quote]

[Wasp]

You obviously grew up with this nonsense crammed in your head and accepted it without the slightest consideration.

Next you'll be telling me that the existence of "God" is a fact because it's written in the bible and that the bible hasn't been proven wrong because the physics of the past aren't the same as the present....blah blah blah...and there are so many churches so he must exist....blah blah blah

Your argument is based on a consensus that uses terms such as "extremely likely" who try to pass that localized and recently recorded events off as evidence. You see the words climate change and global warming and flip out from baseless publications that try to pin those events, or portions thereof, on humans.

Seriously, do your research before you open that idiot hole up.

[SumVeritas]

QUOTE (Wasp @ Jan 31 2017, 05:09 PM) You obviously grew up with this nonsense crammed in your head and accepted it without the slightest consideration.

Next you'll be telling me that the existence of "God" is a fact because it's written in the bible and that the bible hasn't been proven wrong because the physics of the past aren't the same as the present....blah blah blah...and there are so many churches so he must exist....blah blah blah

nah, we have globey and you for such menial job.

QUOTE (Wasp @ Jan 31 2017, 05:09 PM) Your argument is based on a consensus that uses terms such as "extremely likely" who try to pass that localized and recently recorded events off as evidence. You see the words climate change and global warming and flip out from baseless publications that try to pin those events, or portions thereof, on humans.

Seriously, do your research before you open that idiot hole up.

, among the the sources i linked, there is one brought to the discussion by you, but since you just got the out of context quote and never read the whole article...

[ryujin]

QUOTE (Wasp @ Jan 31 2017, 10:26 AM) Simply retarded statement. That logic would mean we assume everything to be true until proven otherwise.

No. that means in the scientific community you make a null hypothesis and try to disprove the null hypothesis.
It doesn't mean we assume everything to be true until we disprove it, it means that if you have a hypothesis, you do everything you can to disprove it, and if you are unsuccessful in disproving it it may bump up the ladder and become a theory.

[Globemaster_III]

Some may think the glass is half empty
i am for sure is half full, when i am saying is half full which meant i can touching
for you guys who think the glass is half empty, i think you guys are half full of it.

[Wasp]

QUOTE (Globemaster_III @ Jan 31 2017, 01:20 PM) Not only that i think but i know, they are the most retarded thinking with an IQ of less than former president OBAMA ( this is not a personal attack mind you).

Took only a few posts from them for me to come to the same conclusion that you did.

Next they'll be proclaiming that God exists because of the number of qualified clergy that were surveyed all agreed and thus the conclusion is indisputable.

Then we'll move on to santa claus and survey school children (the most qualified on the subject) so we can lay that question to rest...

[Globemaster_III]

Sumveritas,

NASA had been support Former president OBama from the beginning for been the first African/American President ( NASA should stay out of politics ) fatal mistake
Former president Obama went on the news media and call NASA is nothing more than Food stamp programs for engineer
he shut down space shuttle program, he shut down SSI program and he even trying to shut down NASA.
At the end of former president Obama, he want American to be first on MARs on peanuts salary and what did NASA do ?
they bring out the 50's and the 60's techno, reason why ? because NASA been run by African/American NASA CEO (Charles Frank Bolden, Jr)
he command NASA for 2744 days and retired on January 20, 2017 as president Trump took offices
i have no confidence on Democrats and NASA, i rather see private company do that with a better results
I do believe you have poor choice of picked NASA information as a fact.

[SumVeritas]

QUOTE (Globemaster_III @ Feb 1 2017, 01:36 PM) Sumveritas,

NASA had been support Former president OBama from the beginning for been the first African/American President ( NASA should stay out of politics ) fatal mistake
Former president Obama went on the news media and call NASA is nothing more than Food stamp programs for engineer
he shut down space shuttle program, he shut down SSI program and he even trying to shut down NASA.
At the end of former president Obama, he want American to be first on MARs on peanuts salary and what did NASA do ?
they bring out the 50's and the 60's techno, reason why ? because NASA been run by African/American NASA CEO (Charles Frank Bolden, Jr)
he command NASA for 2744 days and retired on January 20, 2017 as president Trump took offices
i have no confidence on Democrats and NASA, i rather see private company do that with a better results
I do believe you have poor choice of picked NASA information as a fact.

and¿?

[Globemaster_III]

Other words is don't believe in everything they say.....................
and you can't do anything about it.

[SumVeritas]

and there you go, thanks!