Climate Scientists Laugh at Global Warming Hysteria.

Wasp · Post by **Wasp** » Tue Jan 31, 2017 3:33 am

SumVeritas wrote:QUOTE (SumVeritas @ Jan 30 2017, 07:37 PM) ...if i understand correctly, this isn't a question anymore, not for actual scientists anyway.

It is indeed still a question that scientist who propose must prove. That is how science works.

By your "understanding", incorrectly I might add, is based on what you heard "actual scientists" were supporting yet you know squat about it or them.

SumVeritas · Post by **SumVeritas** » Tue Jan 31, 2017 4:05 am

Wasp wrote:QUOTE (Wasp @ Jan 30 2017, 10:33 PM) It is indeed still a question that scientist who propose must prove. That is how science works.

By your "understanding", incorrectly I might add, is based on what you heard "actual scientists" were supporting yet you know squat about it or them.

Which scitentist, where are their publications. if your resource of scientific studies and facts is youtube, then i can recommend to you some other publications in the same vein, you know like the Bible, or the protocols of the elders of Sion.
I guess, IPCC is just too factual for you.

Post by **Dome** » Tue Jan 31, 2017 4:12 am

SumVeritas wrote:QUOTE (SumVeritas @ Jan 30 2017, 08:05 PM) Which scitentist, where are their publications. if your resource of scientific studies and facts is youtube, then i can recommend to you some other publications in the same vein, you know like the Bible, or the protocols of the elders of Sion.

rofl ahhhhhhh!! Scrubins to the rescue!

ryujin · Post by **ryujin** » Tue Jan 31, 2017 4:36 am

Wasp wrote:QUOTE (Wasp @ Jan 30 2017, 10:33 PM) It is indeed still a question that scientist who propose must prove. That is how science works.

Actually science works by disproving things. It very seldom "proves" anything...

raumvogel · Post by **raumvogel** » Tue Jan 31, 2017 5:41 am

Isn't it nice to see everyone arguing over the same subjects on FB.
It's like these forums pioneered social media.

Post by **Dome** » Tue Jan 31, 2017 8:53 am

raumvogel wrote:QUOTE (raumvogel @ Jan 30 2017, 09:41 PM) Isn't it nice to see everyone arguing over the same subjects on FB.
It's like these forums pioneered social media.

Maybe it's my own bubble, (surely the case) but it's true I see the same things. There are a few Trump supporters that are clinging to any semblance of reason and justification while the vast majority are quick to pick up on seemingly obvious corruption, racism, sexism, etc.

I think this marks the greatest divide of this generation surely. Either you are on the side of equal rights, socioeconomic equality, loving kindness, love for the planet, love for the poor, of everyone on this planet.... OR you look out for yourself and yours only. That seems to be it for this generation. I'm glad to be fighting for all.

Wasp · Post by **Wasp** » Tue Jan 31, 2017 3:22 pm

SumVeritas wrote:QUOTE (SumVeritas @ Jan 30 2017, 11:05 PM) Which scitentist, where are their publications.

That's what I'm asking of you! If you want to state a claim, YOU bare the burden of proof.

SumVeritas wrote:QUOTE (SumVeritas @ Jan 30 2017, 11:05 PM) I guess, IPCC is just too factual for you.

"So how much confidence should we place upon IPCC objectivity to guide regulatory policies? Consider but a couple of statements from key inside sources in their own words.
As written in a 2007 journal Nature article by Kevin Trenberth, a lead author of 2001 and 2007 IPCC reports: “None of the [global climate simulation] models used by the IPCC are initialized to the observed state, and none of the climate states in the models correspond even remotely to the current observed state.”"

If you wish to argue a point, start putting some facts on the table and stop pointing at others to do it for you. You are simply a Global Warming fanboy with zero understanding about the subject.

Wasp · Post by **Wasp** » Tue Jan 31, 2017 3:26 pm

Ryujin wrote:QUOTE (Ryujin @ Jan 30 2017, 11:36 PM) Actually science works by disproving things. It very seldom "proves" anything...

Simply retarded statement. That logic would mean we assume everything to be true until proven otherwise.

sunrodent · Post by **sunrodent** » Tue Jan 31, 2017 5:40 pm

The climate has always changed since i was a kid. As an adult i found Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley had already been looking into the subject.

The final conclusion i came to did not vary very far from his.

Globemaster_III · Post by **Globemaster_III** » Tue Jan 31, 2017 6:20 pm

Wasp quote: Simply retarded statement. That logic would mean we assume everything to be true until proven otherwise. rolleyes.gif

wasp as long as Ryujin, Nix1 breathing, they are omitted carbon footprints, they're the same group of democrats who think illegal immigration have all the right to be here
and the laws doesn't apply to them, same goes for al gore, he is the biggest carbon footprints of them all, remind me of nix1.
Not only that i think but i know, they are the most retarded thinking with an IQ of less than former president OBAMA ( this is not a personal attack mind you).
they were born here and raise here in the great of the US of A, they have no ambition in life, they are taking things for granted
they need to go get a jobs , have a family, have kids, raise kids correctly, be responsible like a normal citizen but i think they can't do it, i know they can't do it
globey why all the hated ? it is not hate, it is enlightenment of a lesson in life, stop living in a cave (men)
If i am wrong, i apologize for this post